Analysis of the Stress Variation on Surrounding Rock during Large Diameter Shield Tunneling

Li Jichao; Guo Dong; Zhao Shiwei; Qiu Yunjun; Deng Feng

doi:10.20174/j.JUSE.2026.03.26

Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering >

2026 , Vol. 22 >Issue 3: 1003 - 1012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20174/j.JUSE.2026.03.26

Analysis of the Stress Variation on Surrounding Rock during Large Diameter Shield Tunneling

Li Jichao ,
Guo Dong ,
Zhao Shiwei ,
Qiu Yunjun ,
Deng Feng

Expand

1. China Construction Infrastructure Co., Ltd., Beijing 100161, P. R. China;
2. China Construction South Investment Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, Guangdong 518000, P. R. China

Received date: 2025-09-08

Online published: 2026-06-23

Fold

Abstract

Large-diameter shield tunneling technology is widely applied in urban rail transit construction. However, its advancement faces significant challenges, including large excavation cross-sections, great burial depths, high thrust and torque requirements, and pronounced disturbances to rock and soil masses. This paper proposes a real-time monitoring method for the surrounding rock stress during shield tunneling, enabling continuous surveillance of stress variations. Based on the test results, the study analyzes the variation patterns of additional stress in the surrounding rock when operating under balanced conditions in an Earth Pressure Balance (EPB) shield. Furthermore, the paper discusses the magnitude and extent of influence of this additional stress. The results indicate that: The stress in the surrounding rock at the tunnel face gradually increases as the shield cutterhead approaches, reaching its peak value when the cutterhead arrives at the monitoring point. This peak value is close to the theoretical value of the additional contact pressure at the tunnel face. Both the circumferential and radial stresses around the tunnel exhibit a trend of initial increase, followed by a decrease, and finally stabilization. Specifically, the circumferential stress reaches its maximum value before the cutterhead arrives at the monitoring point, whereas the radial stress peaks when the cutterhead is directly at the monitoring point. Analysis of the variation pattern of additional stress reveals that the influence range of shield tunneling on the surrounding rock ahead is approximately 0.8 times the cutterhead diameter. Furthermore, both the maximum total additional stress and the residual total additional stress in the surrounding rock show a linear relationship with the distance from the monitoring point to the tunnel wall. Based on the theoretical value of the additional contact pressure at the tunnel face, calculation formulas for the maximum and residual total additional stresses are proposed. These stress variation patterns were further verified using data from shield tunneling in other sections. The research findings can provide a basis for controlling the stability of surrounding rock during large-diameter shield tunneling in urban rail transit projects.

Key words： large-diameter shield; real-time monitoring; additional stress in surrounding rock; influence range; additional contact pressure; residual additional stress

Cite this article

Li Jichao , Guo Dong , Zhao Shiwei , Qiu Yunjun , Deng Feng . Analysis of the Stress Variation on Surrounding Rock during Large Diameter Shield Tunneling[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2026 , 22(3) : 1003 -1012 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2026.03.26

References

[1] 韩宝明, 习喆, 孙亚洁, 等. 2022 年世界城市轨道交通运营统计与分析综述[J]. 都市快轨交通, 2023, 36(1): 1-8. (Han Baoming, Xi Zhe, Sun Yajie, et al. Statistical analysis of urban rail transit operation in the world in 2022: a review[J]. Urban Rapid Rail Transit, 2023, 36(1): 1-8. (in Chinese))
[2] 加瑞,李青茁,杨岗,等. 盾构隧道渗漏对地表沉降和管片受力影响研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2023,19(增1):423-435. (Jia Rui, Li Qingzhuo, Yang Gang, et al. Study on the influences of shield tunnel leakage on ground surface settlement and mechanical behavior of segment[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2023, 19 (Supp.1): 423-435. (in Chinese))
[3] Han W W,Wang X G, Han L J. Study on the optimum grouting materials and their performance in the TBM tunnel collapse reinforcement project[J]. IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, 570(5): 52-65.
[4] Hong K R. Typical underwater tunnels in the mainland of China and related tunneling technologies[J]. Engineering, 2017, 3(6): 871-879.
[5] 方焘,梁连,颜建伟. 不同埋深下盾构隧道施工引起的地层变形试验[J].长江科学院院报,2023,40(3): 85-92. (Fang Tao, Liang Lian, Yan Jiangwei. Experimental study in stratum deformation caused by shield tunnelling at different buried depths[J]. Journal of Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute. 2023, 40(3):85-92. (in Chinese))
[6] Hamderi M. Footing settlement formula based on multi-variable regression analyses[J]. Geomechanics and Engineering, 2019, 17(1): 11-18.
[7] Toshi N, Shinichiro I, Toshiyuki H, et al. Shield tunnel construction in centrifuge[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1999, 125(4): 132-142.
[8] 黄辉,潘泓,陈乔松,等. 高富水复合砂层盾构隧道渗透破坏原因分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2024,20(1):302-310. (Huang Hui, Pan Hong, Chen Qiaosong, et al. Analysis of seepage failure in water-rich composite sand layer caused by shield tunneling[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2024, 20 (1): 302-310. (in Chinese))
[9] 赵玉勃,张忠苗. 盾构法隧道推进引起周围土体的附加应力分析[J]. 岩土工程学报,2010,32(9):1386-1390. (Zhao Yubo, Zhang Zhongmiao. Additional stress of surrounding soil caused by propelling of shield tunneling[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 31(9): 1386-1390. (in Chinese))
[10] 齐静静,徐日庆,魏纲,等. 隧道盾构法施工引起周围土体附加应力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2008, 29(2): 529-534. (Qi Jingjing, Xu Riqing, Wei Gang, et al. Analysis of superimposed stress of surrounding soil due to shield tunneling[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 29(2): 529-534. (in Chinese))
[11] 孙统立,张庆贺,韦良文,等. 双圆盾构掘进施工扰动土体附加应力分析[J].岩土力学, 2008, 29(8): 2246-2251. (Sun Tongli, Zhang Qinghe, Wei Liangwen, et al. Analysis of additional stresses of soil disturbance induced by propulsion of double-O-tube shield[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2008, 29(8): 2246-2251. (in Chinese))
[12] 陈昂,张雪辉,白云,等. 类矩形土压平衡盾构施工附加应力分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2017, 36(7): 1813-1819. (Chen Ang, Zhang Xuehui, Bai Yun, et al. Analysis of the superimposed stress of soil layer induced by quasi rectangle EPB shield tunneling[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 36(7):1813-1819. (in Chinese))
[13] 武崇福,魏超,乔菲菲. 既有上部建筑荷载下盾构施工引起土体附加应力分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2018, 37(7): 14. (Wu Chongfu, Wei Chao, Qiao Feifei. Analysis of additional soil stress caused by shield construction under existing superstructure loads[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2018, 37(7): 14. (in Chinese))
[14] 孙洋,荣耀,习小华,等. 近接施工先行隧道盾构管片三维附加应力监测分析[J]. 公路, 2016, 61(4): 239-247. (Liu Yang, Rong Yao, Xi Xiaohua, et al. Monitoring and Analysis of the three dimensional secondary stress during shield tunnel drive in close proximity[J]. Highway, 2016, 61(4): 239-247. (in Chinese))
[15] 王涛,徐日庆,齐静静,等. 盾构掘进引起的土体附加应力场分析[J].浙江大学学报:工学版, 2008, 42(11):1-6. (Wang Tao, Xu Riqing, Qi Jingjing, et al. Additional stress field of surrounding soil due to shield tunneling[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2008, 42(11):1-6. (in Chinese))
[16] Liu N, Wen Z Y, You G M, et al. Study on the calculation of the surrounding rock stress on shield tunnels in rock strata. Geotechnical and geological engineering, 2023, 41(8): 4383-4393.
[17] 高洪梅,蔡鑫涛,张正,等. 盾构下穿桥梁桩基的截桩效应[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2022,18(6):2045-2051. (Gao Hongmei, Cai Xintao, Zhang Zheng, et al. Pile cutting effect of shield underpass bridge pile foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2022, 18 (6): 2045-2051. (in Chinese))
[18] 储昭飞,刘保国. 盾构法施工深埋斜井的围岩应力变形分析[J]. 北京交通大学学报, 2016, 40 (6): 1-6. (Chu Zhaofei, Liu Baoguo. Stress and deformation analysis of the surrounding rock of deep buried inclined shaft constructed with shield method[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2016, 40 (6): 1-6. (in Chinese))
[19] 黄宏伟,胡昕.顶管施工力学效应的数值模拟分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2003, 22(3): 400-406. (Huang Hongwei, Hu Xin. 3D numerical analysis on construction mechanics effect of pipe-jacking[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2003, 22(3): 400-406. (in Chinese))
[20] 袁峰,李伟,庞磊磊,等.软弱围岩中复合式TBM曲线掘进安全敏感性研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2025,21(增1):514-522. (Yuan Feng1, Li Wei, Pang Leilei,et al.Study on the safety sensitivity of composite tbm curve tunneling in weak surrounding rock[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2025,21(Supp.1):514-522. (in Chinese))
[21] 张霞,杨小龙,向天兵,等.深埋软土盾构隧道围岩压力演变规律及影响因素[J].地下空间与工程学报,2025,21(增2):794-802. (Zhang Xia,Yang Xiaolong,Xiang Tianbing,et al.Evolution and influencing factors of surrounding rock pressure in deep buried soft soil shield tunnels[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2025,21(Supp.2):794-802. (in Chinese))
[22] 晁峰,王明年,刘大刚,等.板岩地层盾构掘进对地层扰动的现场试验研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2018,14(1):138-144,221. (Chao Feng,Wang Mingnian,Liu Dagang,et al.Field test research of ground disturbance by shield tunnelling in slate strata[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2018,14(1):138-144,221. (in Chinese))
[23] 王洪新. 土压平衡盾构刀盘挤土效应及刀盘开口率对盾构正面接触压力影响[J].土木工程学报, 2009, 42(7): 113-118. (Wang Hongxin. Effect of cutterhead compressing the front soil and influence of head aperture ratio on contact pressure of EPB shield to the front soil[J]. Chinese Civil Engineering Journal, 2009, 42(7): 113-118. (in Chinese))

Options

Outlines

模态框（Modal）标题

Abstract

Cite this article

References