With the continuous expansion of the development scale of urban underground space, the blasting vibration control of tunnel engineering has become a key issue affecting the safety of the surrounding environment. In order to improve the level of fine control of blasting, the underground excavation station project of Chongqing Line 17 is taken as the background. By carrying out on-site single-hole and double-hole blasting vibration monitoring, combined with ANSYS/LS-DYNA fluid-solid coupling numerical simulation method, the influence mechanism of single-hole multi-stage blocking charge structure on blasting vibration response and flying rock control is systematically studied. The results show that: The optimal delay time between holes of sand-mudstone interbed in Chongqing is determined to be 17 ms by time history superposition analysis, which can realize vibration wave interference and vibration reduction, and reduce the peak vibration velocity of double-hole blasting by about 10%. The numerical simulation reveals the influence of the blockage length on the stress field and damage distribution in the near area of the borehole. The optimal blockage length is determined to be 80 cm. At this time, the maximum effective stress at the orifice is 6.37 MPa, which is lower than the dynamic tensile strength of sandstone and can effectively inhibit the generation of flying stones. The multi-stage blocking charge structure disperses the concentrated energy release into multiple pulses through segmented delay initiation, which significantly optimizes the stress propagation and energy utilization efficiency. Under the three-stage blocking condition, the maximum particle size of blasting is reduced by 47.7%, and the flying stone distance is reduced by 42.9%. The single-hole multi-stage blocking charge structure can significantly improve the blasting safety and refinement level under the premise of constant total charge, and provide an important basis for blasting design and construction in complex urban environment.
Li Weiyong
,
Zhong Zuliang
,
Liu Yongbo
,
Wang Zhiquan
,
Zhang Heng
. Study on the Response Law of Single-Hole Multi-Stage Blocking Charge Blasting in Sand-Mudstone Formation[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2025
, 21(S2)
: 885
-893
.
DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.S2.42
[1] 张志毅,杨年华,卢文波,等.中国爆破振动控制技术的新进展[J].爆破,2013,30(2):25-32.
[2] 陈思佑,姚颖康,朱丹,等.不同堵塞条件下硬岩隧道直眼掏槽破岩效果数值模拟研究[J].江汉大学学报(自然科学版),2024,52(3):5-15.
[3] 张艳军,陈岩武,雷美荣,等.钻孔爆破炮孔堵塞长度分析[J].爆破,2021,38(3):45-49,129.
[4] 郝亚飞,李海波,刘恺德,等.单自由面爆破振动特征的炮孔堵塞长度效应[J].岩土力学,2011,32(10):3105-3110,3142.
[5] 罗伟,朱传云,祝启虎.隧洞光面爆破中炮孔堵塞长度的数值分析[J].岩土力学,2008(9):2487-2491,2497.
[6] 张科,胡子浩,沙胜军.露天开采爆破飞石安全影响研究[J].有色金属(矿山部分),2025,77(3):86-92.
[7] 刘翔宇.电子雷管起爆体系下城市隧道爆破参数确定方法研究[D].北京:北京科技大学,2022.
[8] Anderson D A.A method for site-specific prediction and control of ground vibration from blasting[A]//Proceedings of the First Mini-symposium on Expiosives and Blasting Research[C].1985:28-42.
[9] 于玲玲,张飞,何文凯.考虑地应力与先爆孔损伤的光面爆破数值模拟[J].地下空间与工程学报,2024,20(2):636-644.
[10] 王鑫,张昌锁.基于ANSYS/LS-DYNA的工业炸药材料参数标定方法[J].爆破,2022,39(1):36-42,50.
[11] Vutukuri V S,Lama R D.Handbook on mechanical properties of rocks:testing techniques and results[M].Ohio:Trans Tech.Publications,1974.
[12] 郭东明,蓝樊革,张伟,等.炮孔堵塞长度对爆破效果的影响研究[J].爆破,2023,40(3):108-115,142.
[13] Osinov V,Gudehus G.Dynamics of hypoplastic materials:theory and numerical implementation[A] ∥Hutter K,Kirchner N,ed.Dynamic Response of Granular and Porous Materials Under Large and Catastrophic Deformations[C].Berlin:Springer,2003:265-84.
[14] Dsouza P V,Nott P R.A non-local constitutive model for slow granular flow that incorporates dilatancy[J].Journal of Fluid Mechanics,2020,DOI:10.1017/jfm.2020.62.
[15] 游帅.不同装药结构爆破应力波的衰减规律试验研究[D].贵阳:贵州大学,2021.
[16] 王卫华,张恒根,李夕兵.爆破载荷下岩石的拉压损伤模型[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2021,52(11):3918-3929.
[17] 全国安全生产标准化技术委员会非煤矿山安全分技术委员会(SAC/TC 288/SC 2).爆破安全规程(GB 6722-2014)[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2014.
[18] 周磊.台阶爆破效果评价及爆破参数优化研究[D].武汉:武汉理工大学,2012.