Study on the Safety Sensitivity of Composite TBM Curve Tunneling in Weak Surrounding Rock

  • Yuan Feng ,
  • Li Wei ,
  • Pang Leilei ,
  • Zhong Zuliang ,
  • Li Ziyang
Expand
  • 1. China Railway Construction Investment Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100000, P. R. China;
    2. China Railway Construction Investment Group Chongqing Co., Ltd., Chongqing 401100, P. R. China;
    3. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, P. R. China

Received date: 2025-05-26

  Online published: 2025-09-03

Abstract

Regarding the safety issues during the excavation process of small radius curved shield tunnels in composite formations of mudstone and backfill soil in Chongqing area, a three-dimensional numerical model was established by Midas. The influencing regularities and sensitivity of curve radius, top thrust force, and unbalanced top thrust force on surface subsidence and surrounding rock deformation were analyzed. The results indicate that: As the radius of the curve increases, the deformation gradually decreases, but the magnitude of the deformation is gentle. There is a critical value for the top thrust, which can cause instability of the palm surface if it is too low, and shear failure of the soil if it is too high. An increase in the proportion of unbalanced thrust will disrupt stress symmetry, and the synergistic effect of soil loss on the weak thrust side and compression on the strong thrust side will exacerbate asymmetric settlement. Sensitivity analysis shows that top thrust plays a dominant role in deformation control, followed by curve radius and unbalanced top thrust. The research results can provide reference for optimizing construction parameters of small radius curved tunnels under similar geological conditions.

Cite this article

Yuan Feng , Li Wei , Pang Leilei , Zhong Zuliang , Li Ziyang . Study on the Safety Sensitivity of Composite TBM Curve Tunneling in Weak Surrounding Rock[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2025 , 21(S1) : 514 -522 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.S1.60

References

[1] Liu Y, Lei H, Shi L, et al. Deformation analysis of ground and existing tunnel induced by overlapped curved shield tunneling[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 17(2): 795-809.
[2] Zhang X, Luo B, Xu Y, et al. Case study of performance assessment of overlapping shield tunnels with a small curve radius[J]. Deep Underground Science and Engineering, 2023, 3(4): 481-496.
[3] 赵秀绍, 魏度强, 于万友, 等. 小曲线半径盾构隧道上穿既有隧道影响分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2021, 17(4): 1216-1224.
[4] 郝润霞. 软土地区曲线段盾构隧道超挖量与注浆量分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2013, 9(5): 1132-1136.
[5] 刘书斌, 周立波. 小半径曲线地段盾构施工质量调研与分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2013, 9(增2): 1936-1939, 1950.
[6] 赵翌川, 颜建平, 张晨光, 等. 小半径曲线盾构隧道施工的地层扰动规律研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022, 59(增1): 243-250.
[7] Wang X, Liu X, Lin Y, et al. Analysis of the effect of pore water pressure on a small radius curve section of a fine sand layer under cyclic metro[J]. Water 2023, 15(5): 981.
[8] Hu Y, Tang H, Xu Y, et al. Ground settlement and tunnel response due to twin-curved shield tunnelling in soft ground with small clear distance[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 16(8): 3122-3135.
[9] 吴迪, 蒋敏敏, 肖昭然. 小半径曲线盾构施工对周边土体位移的影响[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 40(4): 318-326.
[10] 孙捷城, 路林海, 王国富, 等. 小半径曲线盾构隧道掘进施工地表变形计算[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2019, 40(5): 63-72.
[11] Yang B, Zhang C Y, Su N, et al. Influence of small radius curved shield tunneling excavation on displacement of surrounding soil[J]. Buildings, 2023, 13(3): 803-803.
[12] Feng X J, Wang P, Liu H F. Mechanism and law analysis on ground settlement caused by shield excavation of small-radius curved tunnel[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2022, 55(3): 3473-3488.
[13] 叶雅图, 王世君, 王琪. 小半径上下重叠地铁盾构隧道设计与施工[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2008(4): 696-701,733.
[14] 陈洪涛, 王连俊, 李阳. 岩溶软土区高速公路复合地基参数对路基沉降敏感性分析[J]. 公路, 2017, 62(8): 62-64.
Outlines

/