Altered diabase is a kind of undesirable geological body often encountered in the construction of underground engineering in western China, which has a significant impact on the stability of the surrounding rock of tunnels. In this paper, based on the statistical analysis of the collapse of the tunnel face during the excavation process of the altered diabase diversion tunnel of the Dadu River Yingliangbao Hydropower Station, the main influencing factors of the stability of the altered diabase tunnel surrounding rock were analyzed by numerical simulation methods, and the matter-element extension theory was introduced to evaluate the collapse risk. The results show that the stability of the surrounding rock of the altered diabase tunnel is mainly controlled by the characteristics of the altered rock zone, the width of the alteration zone, and the condition of groundwater. On the premise of evaluating the degree of collapse by the height of collapse, the wider the alteration rock zone, the worse the characteristics, the richer the groundwater, the worse the stability of the surrounding rock, and the higher the risk of collapse in the cave roof in front of the working face. In addition, the outcropping position of the altered rock zone and the characteristics of the granite on both sides also have a certain impact on the stability of the surrounding rock. After the qualitative indexes were quantitatively processed, the width of the altered rock zone, the diabase alteration intensity index, the groundwater condition, the outcropping location and the surrounding rock granite alteration intensity index were selected as the evaluation indexes, and a collapse risk assessment method based on matter-element extension theory was established, and the collapse risk of the diabase alteration zone in the diversion tunnel was evaluated. The calculation grade is highly consistent with the actual situation, which provides theoretical support for the construction of water diversion tunnel and tunnel engineering.
[1] 李文纲, 王仁坤, 贺如平, 等. 岩体流变力学特性与工程稳定性[M]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2016.
[2] 苗朝, 沈军辉, 李文纲, 等. 大岗山坝区辉绿岩脉蚀变泥化特征及机理研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2014, 22(1):130-136.
[3] 燕俊松. 构造复杂区蚀变岩体工程地质特性研究——以大渡河硬梁包水电站为例[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2022.
[4] 魏伟. 孟底沟水电站坝址区蚀变岩工程地质特性研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2015.
[5] 张永双, 曲永新, 刘景儒, 等. 滇藏铁路滇西北段蒙脱石化蚀变岩的工程地质研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2007(4):531-536.
[6] 张永双, 李金秋, 任三绍, 等. 川藏交通廊道黏土化蚀变岩发育特征及其对大型滑坡的促滑作用[J]. 地球科学, 2022, 47(6):1945-1956.
[7] 孙强, 朱术云, 薛雷. 西南某地岩石蚀变机制及工程地质特性[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2012. 43(12):4819-4826.
[8] 杨根兰, 黄润秋, 王奖臻, 等. 某工程蚀变岩孔隙特征及其软弱程度研究[J]. 矿物岩石, 2006, 26(4): 111-115.
[9] 王能峰, 黄春, 谢洪毅. 某水电站厂址区蚀变岩体力学特性研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2017, 13(增2):553-558.
[10] 覃礼貌, 许模. 西南某水电站坝区岩体绿泥石化蚀变及其工程对策[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2007 (1):68-72.
[11] Rigopoulos I, Tsikouras B, Pomonis P, et al. The influence of alteration on the engineering properties of dolerites: the examples from the pindos and vourinos ophiolites (northern Greece)[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2010, 47(1):69-80.
[12] 陈华. 大岗山水电站坝基辉绿岩脉工程地质特性研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2013.
[13] 董金玉, 石尚, 李建勇, 等. 蚀变岩工程分级与物理力学性质研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2022, 30(3):966-974.
[14] 石少帅, 李术才, 李利平, 等. 软弱夹层对隧道围岩稳定性影响规律研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2013, 9(4):836-842, 853.
[15] 王瑞红, 郭金龙, 宛良朋, 等. 不同埋深对某水电站隧洞围岩流变稳定性影响[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2015, 32(7):99-104.
[16] 周敏娟, 王海彦, 胡宇庭. 开挖跨度对隧道围岩稳定性影响研究[J]. 中外公路, 2015, 35(6):226-229.
[17] 张兴伟, 王超. 软弱层状地基隧道围岩稳定性及地表沉降分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2022, 18(增1):396-403,411.
[18] 陈曦, 赵勇, 杨玉顺. 岩体力学参数对隧道围岩稳定性的影响分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019, 56(5):77-84.
[19] 杨建辉, 沈恺, 周杰, 等. 穿越富水断层破碎带隧道塌方机理分析与预防[J]. 工程地质学报, 2023, 31(1):248-257.
[20] 孙元春, 白连福, 曾庆利. 岩脉对隧道围岩稳定性影响分析[J]. 工程勘察, 2010, 38(10):14-18.
[21] 弯晓林. 侵入蚀变岩隧道大变形控制技术研究[J]. 铁道建筑技术, 2022(2):104-107, 197.
[22] 张树军, 贺宁波, 周志东. 某水电站引水隧洞蚀变围岩施工技术研究[J]. 四川水力发电, 2021, 40(3):15-18.
[23] 闫生存, 徐继敏, 薛瑞华, 等. 大断面蚀变软岩引水隧洞施工方案适宜性研究[J]. 四川水力发电, 2023, 42(1):1-5, 13.
[24] 吴修梅. 基于PSO优化神经网络的公路隧道塌方风险研究[D]. 南昌:东华理工大学, 2023.
[25] Kim J, Kim C, Kim G, et al. Probabilistic tunnel collapse risk evaluation model using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and delphi survey technique[J]. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 2022, 120:104262.
[26] 谭立伟, 温少卿, 李开华, 等. 基于改进G2-EWM-TOPSIS模型的引水隧洞塌方风险评价[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2023, 23(30):13105-13111.
[27] 张建明, 侍克斌, 善鸿泽, 等. 基于多因子遴选和灰色聚类矢量投影法的隧洞塌方风险评价方法及应用[J]. 水电能源科学, 2023, 41(5):121-125.
[28] 任洋, 李天斌, 熊国斌, 等. 基于可拓理论的高地应力隧道围岩分级法及应用[J]. 工程地质学报, 2012, 20(1):66-73.
[29] 黄小城, 陈秋南, 阳跃朋, 等. 可拓理论对复杂条件下岩溶隧道的风险评估[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2013, 9(5):1179-1185.
[30] 陈思华. 隧道蚀变围岩分级及土石混合体细观特性研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2020.
[31] 刘秀, 李文洋. 基于熵权物元可拓模型的路堑边坡安全性评价[J]. 公路交通科技, 2022, 39(11):49-55.
[32] 汪成兵, 朱合华. 隧道塌方机制及其影响因素离散元模拟[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008. 30(3): 450-456.
[33] Sibson R. Fault rocks and fault mechanisms[J]. Journal of the Geological Society, 1977, 133(3):191-213.
[34] Wise D, Dunn D, Engelder J, et al. Fault-related rocks: Suggestions for terminology[J]. Geology, 1984, 12(7):391-394.
[35] 刘正宏, 陈煜嵩, 贾振杨, 等. 地壳不同构造层次岩石变形机制及其构造岩类型[J]. 岩石学报, 2020, 36(8):2344-2356.
[36] Hao Y, Azzam R. The plastic zones and displacements around underground openings in rock masses containing a fault[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2005, 20(1): 49-61.
[37] 郑康成, 丁文其, 金威. 基于模型试验与FEM的TBM圆形隧道压力拱成拱规律[J]. 煤炭学报, 2015, 40 (6): 1270-1275.
[38] Huang F, Zhu H, Xu Q, et al. The effect of weak interlayer on the failure pattern of rock mass around tunnel-scaled model tests and numerical analysis[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013, 35: 207-218.
[39] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 水利水电工程地质勘察规范(GB50487-2008)[S]. 北京:中国计划出版社, 2022.
[40] 中华人民共和国水利部. 水工隧洞设计规范(NB/T10391-2020)[S]. 北京:中国水利水电出版社, 2021.
