Response Characteristics of Micro Difference Blasting Technology for Ultra-Close Range over Existing Tunnels

  • Wang Xing ,
  • Huang Shuai ,
  • Niu Yapeng ,
  • He Xiongfei ,
  • Nie Yawei
Expand
  • 1. CCCC Second Highway Engineering Co., Ltd., Xi'an 710065, P. R. China;
    2. Research and Development Center on Construction Technology of Long Bridge & Tunnel in Mountain Area, CCCC, Xi'an 710199, P. R. China

Received date: 2024-10-24

  Online published: 2025-09-03

Abstract

A micro difference blasting construction technique was employed on-site to investigate the changes in the first principal stress, vibration velocity, and displacement of the initial support structure of the lower main tunnel after the blasting construction of the upper smoke exhaust channel, in response to the construction of the main tunnel structure at a close range (4.44 m). The finite element numerical calculation method was used to quantitatively assess the safety of the adjacent tunnel. The results show that: After the full section blasting of the longitudinal exhaust duct, the most dangerous point of the initial support structure of the main tunnel is located at the arch position directly below the blasting face of the longitudinal exhaust duct. The peak vibration velocities in the X, Y, and Z directions of the control nodes are all less than the standard value of 20 cm/s, and the displacement value is within 3.63 mm; The stress and deformation curves of the lining structure peak within 200~300 ms and subsequently exhibit oscillatory attenuation over time. The local tensile stress concentration state is formed at the arch crown, and the overall risk of the structure is controllable. After using the micro difference blasting technology for construction on site, the smoke exhaust channel smoothly crossed through the main tunnel structure. At the intersection of the initial support arch crown, there was a local phenomenon of initial support falling off due to individual anchor rod bending and prying, and the overall stress was relatively safe. The on-site monitoring results are consistent with the numerical calculations, proving the reasonable reliability of the micro difference blasting construction technology. The research results can provide reference for similar projects.

Cite this article

Wang Xing , Huang Shuai , Niu Yapeng , He Xiongfei , Nie Yawei . Response Characteristics of Micro Difference Blasting Technology for Ultra-Close Range over Existing Tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2025 , 21(S1) : 424 -430 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.S1.50

References

[1] 刘家明,张俊儒,王智勇,等.硬质地层下近接隧道爆破振动影响分区及动力响应研究[J]. 现代隧道技术,2023,60(2):125-137.
[2] 颜天成,张庆彬,陈敏.新建隧道爆破对下部近接运营高铁隧道影响分析[J]. 爆破,2023,40(1):185-193,220.
[3] 王景春,刘凯林,李永昊,等.考虑片理倾角的钻爆法隧道松动圈演变规律研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2023,19(5):1602-1610.
[4] 赵岩,王小敬,王海龙,等.交叉隧道爆破振速回归分析及对比研究[J]. 工程爆破,2022,28(5):121-127.
[5] 马玉春,马丽娜.基于Midas/GTS的隧道变形控制措施和开挖方法研究[J]. 公路工程,2020,45(5):149-155,219.
[6] 关振长,朱凌枫,俞伯林.隧道掘进排孔爆破的精细化数值模拟[J]. 振动与冲击,2021,40(11):154-162.
[7] 吴铭芳.邻近隧道爆破施工对输油管道影响范围研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2016,12(增2):703-706.
[8] 李铮,何川,汪波,等. 城市隧道穿越复合地层的合理微差时间间隔[J]. 爆炸与冲击,2016,36(1) : 93-100.
[9] 钱正富,徐金峰,周应新,等.红层软岩无中导洞连拱隧道爆破振动控制技术研究[J]. 现代隧道技术,2020,57(3):167-174,188.
[10] 张伟,王少飞,喻佳,等.无中导洞连拱隧道后行洞爆破方案优化研究-以新民隧道为例[J]. 隧道建设(中英文):2022,42(增2):412-420.
[11] 王海龙,李云赫,赵岩.下穿隧道掘进爆破地表振动波传播规律[J]. 工程爆破,2022,28(3):39-46.
[12] 林豪,吕文明,郭洪雨,等.并行近接隧道中减振孔的爆破振动控制效果研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2023,19(5):1691-1698,1718.
[13] 杨建华,黄启欢,姚池,等.空洞对隧道喷射混凝土爆破振动特性及安全评价的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学,2022,43(5):1401-1411.
[14] 王延雨,温小宝,王军,等.隧道近接穿越古迹爆破施工安全控制技术[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2024,20(2):645-656.
[15] 万春浪,黄文宁.山岭隧道爆破条件下初支混凝土振动影响研究[J]. 西部交通科技,2022,(3):75-79.
[16] 赵立财.隧道爆破及车辆荷载耦合作用下公路振动研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2022,18(5):1724-1730.
[17] 江伟,高启栋,王亚琼,等.无中墙连拱隧道先行洞爆破振动响应特性与隔振方案比选研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2023,45(11):2367-2377.
[18] 王永伟,李冠中.西双版纳隧道爆破开挖动力力学特征及损伤效应[J]. 长江科学院院报,2023,40(1):165-170.
Outlines

/