Comparison and Selection Research on the Excavation Methods for Large-Section Underground Subway Stations

  • Lu Jinbiao ,
  • Xu Hailong ,
  • Li Yandong ,
  • Zhang Haiquan ,
  • Zhang Yongfeng
Expand
  • 1. PowerChina Construction Railway Investment Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100000, P. R. China;
    2. PowerChina Construction Railway Investment Group Chongqing Co., Ltd., Chongqing 401100, P. R. China

Received date: 2025-05-28

  Online published: 2025-09-03

Abstract

As the construction conditions of metro stations in cities become more and more complex, a new station construction technology “tunnel before station” method emerged and became more mature, and the appropriate excavation method is a key part of the “tunnel before station” method. Based on an underground subway station project of Line 4 in Chongqing City, this paper uses finite element software FLAC3D to conduct numerical simulation of three excavation methods (double-sidewall diversion method, CD method and three-step seven-step excavation method). The settlement law of the stratum under three excavation methods and the stress-strain response law between station supporting structure, shield temporary segment lining and excavation are studied. The results show that: The formation settlement increases with the increase of buried depth, in which the two-sidewall diversion method produces the smallest settlement, and the three-step seven-step method produces the largest settlement. Under the three excavation methods, the stress distribution of the bolt and the secondary lining is almost the same, in which the axial force of the double-wall driving method is about 30% higher than that of the other two excavation methods, while the stress characteristics of the secondary lining with the three-step and seven-step method are superior to the other excavation methods. Compared with the stress and strain distribution of shield temporary segment lining, the double-sidewall heading method is obviously superior to CD method and three-step seven-step method.

Cite this article

Lu Jinbiao , Xu Hailong , Li Yandong , Zhang Haiquan , Zhang Yongfeng . Comparison and Selection Research on the Excavation Methods for Large-Section Underground Subway Stations[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2025 , 21(S1) : 403 -409 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.S1.47

References

[1] 李聪,廖正根,马加志.“先隧后井”法施工管片环缝防突涌处理技术[J]. 现代隧道技术,2021,58(增2):154-159.
[2] 杨春山.盾构隧道先隧后井施工对隧道变形的影响及对策研究[D]. 广州:华南理工大学,2015.
[3] Furukawa Y, Kitawaki T, Nishio M. Plan for executing a four-centered circular muddy water injection type shield tunneling method in Roppongi Station on the Metropolitan Subway No.12[J]. Kensetsu No Kikaika, 1997.
[4] Zertsalov M G, Kazachenko S A, Konyukhov D S. Investigation of foundation pit excavation influence on adjacent building[J]. Vestnik Mgsu,2014,104(6):57-62.
[5] 许世伟.盾构扩挖修建地铁车站施工方案研究[D]. 北京:北京交通大学,2007.
[6] 黄明利,申巧凤,申荣杰.单洞双线盾构隧道扩挖地铁车站方案研究[J]. 现代隧道技术,2017(6):15-23.
[7] 晏启祥, 刘罡, 李彬,等. 基于盾构扩挖法的地铁联络线施工力学分析[J]. 城市轨道交通研究,2014(7):93-98.
[8] 林刚,何川.盾构隧道基础上修建三连拱地铁车站结构参数研究[J]. 铁道学报,2003(6):93-98
[9] 李爱东,邓永忠.地铁车站小盾构先行大盾构扩挖技术研究应用[J]. 现代城市轨道交通,2021(增1):31-35.
[10] 上经卫,王琳凯,赵兴,等.“先隧后站”三台阶与两台阶开挖数值模拟对比分析研究[J]. 新型工业化,2022,12 (11) :117-122.
Outlines

/