Tunnel TBM construction has the characteristics of high efficiency and green, but there is still a problem of poor adaptability to adverse engineering geological conditions. In order to avoid blind excavation of TBM due to unclear adverse geological conditions beforehand, the implementation and innovation of geological prediction technology during the construction period are particularly crucial. Based on the analysis of the characteristics of TBM construction and the difficulties of geological prediction technology, the article focuses on the selection of prediction technology for seismic wave method field source types and excitation forms, loading mode of prediction equipment, prediction length and timeliness of results, and conducts in-depth research on the real-time geological prediction technology of TBM rock breaking source HSP method. By installing HSP prediction equipment on TBM, the automatic collection of rock breaking vibration information, intelligent data processing, intelligent identification of anomalies, and real-time interpretation of results are achieved, which improves the applicability of geological prediction technology scenarios, portability of on-site testing, and real-time achievement acquisition under TBM construction method; Propose a data processing technique based on multiple interactive iterations of forecast results to reduce false anomalies and improve accuracy. And based on the engineering applications of Xianglushan TBM tunnel for water diversion in central Yunnan, Daliangshan TBM tunnel for Lexi Expressway, and TBM tunnel for plateau railway, the detection effect of HSP real-time prediction technology on adverse geological bodies such as fault fracture zones and water rich structural zones was verified, which played a certain role in promoting efficient TBM construction and provided reference for geological prediction work in similar TBM construction tunnels.
Lu Song
,
Chen Weitao
,
Wang Xu
. Real-Time Advanced Geological Prediction Technology of TBM Rock-Breaking Seismic Source HSP Method and Its Application[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2025
, 21(S1)
: 376
-385
.
DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.S1.44
[1] 张照太, 陈竹, 马鹏辉. 大伙房引水隧洞不良地质洞段围岩变形监测及支护措施分析[J]. 现代隧道技术,2007, 44(5): 68-71.
[2] 张镜剑, 傅冰骏. 隧道掘进机在我国应用的进展[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2007, 26(2): 226-238.
[3] 卢松,李苍松,吴丰收,等.HSP法在引汉济渭TBM隧道地质预报中的应用[J]. 隧道建设,2017,37(2):236-241.
[4] 姚林林, 张世殊, 崔中涛, 等. 双护盾TBM施工综合超前地质预报技术探讨[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2019, 15(5): 1549-1556.
[5] 吕二超.ISP地质预报系统在引汉济渭工程岭北TBM施工中的应用[J]. 铁道建筑技术,2016(6):52-55.
[6] 邓铭江, 许振浩, 刘斌. 超特长隧洞TBM施工“115”超前地质预报系统创建与实践——以北疆供水二期工程为例[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2021, 41(9): 1433-1450.
[7] 杨红霞, 陈安东, 孙兴邦, 戴学宇, 孟松涧. 滇中引水工程香炉山隧洞TBM超前预报体系实践[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2024, 20(增2): 834-840.
[8] Zhao Y G, Jiang H, Zhao X P. Tunnel seismic tomography method for geological prediction and its application[J]. Applied Geophysics, 2006, 3(2):69-74, 130.
[9] Petronio L,Poletto F. Seismic-while-drilling by using tunnel boring machine noise[J]. Geophysics,2002,67 (6): 1798.
[10] Kaus A,Boening W.BEAM-Geoelectrical Ahead onitoring for TBM-Drives[J]. Geomechanik and Tunnelbau, 2008, 1(5):200800048.
[11] 朱劲,李天斌,李永林,等. Beam超前地质预报技术在铜锣山隧道中的应用[J]. 工程地质学报,2007(2):258-262.
[12] 魏晓龙, 郑俊祥, 林福龙,等. 基于聚焦频域激电法的盾构施工地质预报系统[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2022, 18(1): 290-296.
[13] 李术才,聂利超,刘斌,等.多同性源阵列电阻率法隧道超前探测方法与物理模拟试验研究[J]. 地球物理学报,2015,58(4):1434-1446.
[14] Nie L, Song Z, Li Z, et al. Ground-tunnel geological prospecting and treatment methods of small-diameter TBM crossing shallow buried water-rich tunnel: A case study[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2024, 153: 106024.
[15] 陈方明,谢冕,蒋辉.复频电导技术在隧洞超前探水中的应用[J]. 人民长江,2015,46(21):50-54.
[16] 何发亮,郭如军,李苍松,等.岩体温度法隧道施工掌子面前方涌水预报[M]. 西南交通大学出版社,2009.
[17] 卢松,汪旭,李苍松,等.适于TBM施工的HSP法实时预报技术设计与实现[J]. 隧道建设(中英文),2019,39(8):1255-1261.
[18] 朱恒,王德利,时志安,等.地震干涉技术被动源地震成像[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2012,27(2):496-502.