Research on the Stiffness and Failure Mode of SMW Construction Shaped Steel Cement Soil Composite

  • Ling Tonghua ,
  • Li Yong ,
  • Gu Danping
Expand
  • School of Civil Engineering, Changsha University of Science & Technology, Changsha 410114, P. R. China

Received date: 2024-12-09

  Online published: 2025-09-03

Abstract

To deeply analyze the stiffness and failure mode of composite beams under the combined action of SMW construction shaped steel and cement soil, the article measured the deflection of steel-cement soil composite beams during the bending process through indoor experiments and simulated the behavior using ABAQUS finite element software. Comparative analysis showed that the friction contact element was more reasonable in simulating the steel-cement soil contact relationship. On the basis of verifying the model, the specific effects of factors such as the friction coefficient of the steel cement soil contact surface and the strength of the cement soil on the stiffness changes of the composite structure were further explored. The results show that the frictional contact element can more accurately reflect the actual contact behavior and has a high degree of agreement with experimental data; The greater the interaction between steel and cement soil, the greater the overall stiffness of the composite beam; Under the same load, the stiffness of steel-cement soil composite beams will increase with the increase of cement soil strength.

Cite this article

Ling Tonghua , Li Yong , Gu Danping . Research on the Stiffness and Failure Mode of SMW Construction Shaped Steel Cement Soil Composite[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2025 , 21(S1) : 209 -217 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.S1.25

References

[1] 孔德志, 冯娇伟, 宋艳香. 劲性水泥土桩连续墙的工作机理分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(增2): 43-46.
[2] 颜荣华, 朱明, 郭玉君, 等. SMW工法基坑围护对邻近轨道高架的影响分析[J]. 建筑结构, 2023, 53(增1): 2908-2911.
[3] Watanabe S, Furuyama S I, Takaki Y. Effect of the Countermeasures for Preserving Groundwater Flow in Construction of Subway Tunnel Structures[J]. Journal of Tunnel Engineering JSCE, 2000.
[4] Renato F, Manfred S, Erwin S. Cutter Soil Mixing (C.S.M.): An Innovation in Soil Mixing for Creating Cut-off and Retaining Walls[A]//16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering[C]. 2005: 1185-1188.
[5] Shao Y, Macari J E, Cai W. Compound Deep Soil Mixing Columns for Retaining Structures in Excavations[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131(11): 1370-1377.
[6] 王健, 傅德明, 夏明耀. 型钢水泥土组合梁抗弯模型试验研究[J]. 地下工程与隧道, 1997(3): 21-25.
[7] 郑刚, 李志伟, 刘畅. 型钢水泥土组合梁抗弯性能试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(3): 332-340.
[8] 俞设, 王平, 丁勇, 等. 型钢水泥土梁实验方法研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2013, 9(增2): 1845-1847.
[9] 丁勇, 俞设, 王平, 等. 水泥土强度对型钢水泥土组合梁的影响研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2017, 13(3): 698-702.
[10] 凌同华, 谷淡平, 曹峰, 等. 软土地区型钢水泥土搅拌墙墙-土相互作用试验研究[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2018, 38(3): 409-418.
[11] 谷淡平, 凌同华. 悬臂式型钢水泥土搅拌墙的水泥土承载比和墙顶位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1957-1965.
[12] 闫芙蓉, 岳小丹, 胡雪源, 等. 考虑土体卸荷力学特性的基坑变形分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2022, 18(2): 554-561.
[13] 肖潇, 李明广, 陈锦剑, 等. 基坑开挖对围护墙竖向变形的影响机理[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2018, 52(12): 1552-1558.
[14] 王艳明, 张敏, 刘东明, 等. 富水软弱地层综合管廊SMW工法桩力学特性与优化设计[J]. 公路交通科技, 2020, 37(11): 71-80.
[15] 琚娟, 叶耀东, 王如路. SMW工法桩施工对深层土体水平位移影响试验研究[J]. 建筑技术, 2006, 37(12): 903-905.
[16] 谭轲, 王卫东, 邸国恩. TRD工法型钢水泥土搅拌墙的承载变形性状分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(增2): 191-196.
[17] 陈梦. 型钢﹣水泥土复合重力式挡墙协同工作的变形特性分析[J]. 岩土工程技术, 2021, 35(1): 7-11.
[18] 邓友涛. TRD等厚度型钢水泥土搅拌墙在基坑工程中的应用分析[J]. 工程与建设, 2022, 36(5): 1337-1340.
[19] 中华人民共和国水利部. 土工试验方法标准(GB/T 50123-2019)[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2019.
[20] 中华人民共和国建设部. 土的工程分类标准(GB/T 50145-2007)[S]. 北京: 中国计划出版社, 2007.
[21] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 水泥土配合比设计规程(JGJ/T 233-2011)[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2011.
[22] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 混凝土结构试验方法标准(GB/T 50152-2012)[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2012.
[23] 李红, 安建利, 姜维山. 型钢与混凝土粘结性能的试验研究[J]. 哈尔滨建筑工程学院学报, 1993 (增1): 214-223.
[24] 龚晓南. 土工计算机分析[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 2000.
[25] 孔德志, 张慧. 型钢水泥土组合结构抗弯工作性能[J]. 河南大学学报(自然科学版), 2005(1):92-96.
Outlines

/