The primary parameters involved in settlement calculation include coefficient of compressibility, modulus of compressibility, compression index, and swelling index. This paper conducted a substantial number of consolidation tests based on the research background of soft soil in the Guangzhou coastal area, analyzed soft soil's consolidation state, and performed correlation analysis on physical indexes (water content), initial void ratio, natural density, liquid limit and deformation indexes (coefficient of compressibility), modulus of compressibility, compression index, and swelling index. The validity of the proposed formula is demonstrated through a practical example. The results show that: (1) The soft soil in the coastal area of Guangzhou has high compressibility and under-consolidation, but there is still a lot of over-consolidation in the shallow part of the surface 5 m buried depth. This paper establishes the empirical model of over consolidation ratio OCR and buried depth of soft soil. (2) The compressibility coefficient, compression index, and swelling index are positively correlated with The water content, initial void ratio, and liquid limit, but negatively correlated with natural density. (3) The modulus of compressibility is negatively correlated with water content, initial void ratio, and liquid limit, but positively correlated with natural density. (4) The empirical formula presented in this paper contains certain inaccuracies; therefore, it is essential to select the appropriate calculation formula based on the intended application.
Wang Weiqi
,
Lian Changjiang
,
Yuan Qiang
,
Li Jianping
,
Li Jian'an
. Study on the Deformation Index of Soft Soil in Guangzhou Coastal Area[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2025
, 21(S1)
: 102
-110
.
DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.S1.13
[1] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 建筑地基基础设计规范(GB50007-2011)[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2011.
[2] 李广信, 张丙印, 于玉贞. 土力学(第2版)[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2013.
[3] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. 高层建筑岩土工程勘察标准(JGJ/T72-2017)[S]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2017.
[4] 魏道垛, 胡中雄. 上海浅层地基土的前期固结压力及有关压缩性参数的试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1980, 2(4): 13-22.
[5] Azzouz A S, Krizek R J, Corotis R B. Regression analysis of soil compressibility[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1976, 16(2): 19-29.
[6] Mayhe P W. Cam-clays Predictions of Undrained Strength[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division (ASCE), 1980, 106(11): 1219-1242.
[7] 丁雷, 江永健, 陈多才, 等. 广州软土的力学特性与相关性研究[J]. 铁道建筑, 2011(10): 75-78.
[8] 唐军平, 何国东, 付旭, 等. 佛山地基软土物理力学指标间的相关性研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2008, 14(增2): 645-659.
[9] 宋许根, 王志勇, 柏威伟, 等.珠海西部中心城区大面积深厚软土工程特性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(7): 1434-1451.
[10] 赵有明, 江辉煌, 张惠明. 深圳地区软粘土变形参数研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2004, 25(3): 40-43.
[11] 杨爱武, 梁振振, 杨少坤, 等.天津滨海重塑软黏土一维固结蠕变特性研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2022, 18(5): 1532-1538.
[12] 蔡子勇, 乔世范, 檀俊坤 等.南沙港区深厚淤泥软土特性及空间异性研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2023, 19(3): 897-910.
[13] 王磊, 周嘉礼, 史雅娟, 等. 河口三角洲地区地下空间保护与开发实践[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2022, 18(6): 1769-1778.
[14] 刘伟, 陈凌伟, 张庆华, 等.广州南沙区软土分布特征及工程性质[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2022, 39(1): 94-99.
[15] 梁仕华, 戴君. 中山港地区软土物理力学指标统计分析[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2016, 33(3): 81-87.
[16] 刘勇健, 刘湘秋, 刘雅恒, 等.珠江三角洲软土物理力学性质对比分析[J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2013, 30(3): 30-36.
[17] 尹利华, 王晓谋, 张留俊. 天津软土土性指标概率分布统计分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(增2): 462-469.
[18] 张亚玲. 绍兴地区多相多模软土的工程地质特性研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学, 2021.
[19] 刘伽, 朱斌, 段磊, 等.大连黏性土压缩指数与物理指标相关性分析[J]. 土木工程与管理学报, 2018, 35(3): 118-123.
[20] 魏道垛, 胡中雄. 上海浅层地基土的前期固结压力及有关压缩性参数的试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1980, 2(4): 13-22.
[21] 何平, 王卫东, 徐中华. 上海黏土压缩指数和回弹指数经验关系[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(10): 3773-3782.
[22] 顾小芸. 应用数理统计方法确定海洋土的工程特性[A]//第四届土力学及基础工程学术会议[C]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 1986: 415-421.
[23] Gao D Z, Wei D D, Hu Z X. Geotechnical properties of Shanghai soils and engineering applications[A]// Marine Geotechnology and Nearshore/Offshore Structures[C]. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1986: 161-177.
[24] 孙更生, 郑大同. 软土地基与地下工程[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 1984.
