A Variable Weight Calculation Model for Structural Health Diagnosis Indicators of Shield Tunnels

  • Zheng Huanyu ,
  • Zhang Wei ,
  • Huang Zhen ,
  • Hu Zhaojian ,
  • Liu Ying
Expand
  • 1. Guangxi Road Construction Engineering Group Co., Ltd., Nanning 530200, P. R. China;
    2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, P. R. China

Received date: 2024-11-24

  Online published: 2025-09-03

Abstract

Typical shield tunnel structural defects such as lining cracks, seepage, material degradation, etc., will continue to develop over operation time, and are affected by complex external qualitative factors such as geological conditions. Quantifying the temporal variation patterns of these factors is very difficult, and structural health diagnosis also hindered. Based on this, by quantifying the relative importance of various structural defects at different times, the impact of structural defect development on structural health is indirectly considered. A shield tunnel health diagnosis index variable weight calculation model is established, which includes the importance of diagnosis index variable weight calculation, variable weight model, and fuzzy optimal worst subjective weight calculation method. Solved the problems of strong subjectivity, and cumbersome calculation steps in existing weight calculation methods, laying the foundation for constructing a systematic structural health diagnosis method. The model is used to provide support for the structural health diagnosis of the uplink of Nanning Rail Transit Line 1. The health diagnosis results are consistent with the actual structural health status of the line.

Cite this article

Zheng Huanyu , Zhang Wei , Huang Zhen , Hu Zhaojian , Liu Ying . A Variable Weight Calculation Model for Structural Health Diagnosis Indicators of Shield Tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2025 , 21(S1) : 44 -50 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.S1.06

References

[1] Huang H, Zhang Y, Zhang D, et al. Field data-based probabilistic assessment on degradation of deformational performance for shield tunnel in soft clay[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 67: 107-119.
[2] Li D, Xie Q, Gong X, et al. Automatic defect detection of metro tunnel surfaces using a vision-based inspection system[J]. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2021, 47: 101206.
[3] Yan Z, Li J, Shen Y, et al. Damage identification method on shield tunnel based on PLSR and equivalent damage analysis[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2023, 137: 105127.
[4] 甘高源. 基于变权理论的轨交隧道健康诊断方法研究[D]. 山东: 山东大学,2023.
[5] 黄震,傅鹤林,黄宏伟, 等.一种运营地铁盾构隧道结构健康状况评价方法[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2018,14(5):1410-1418.
[6] Xu X, Tong L, Liu S, et al. Evaluation model for immersed tunnel health state: A case study of Honggu Tunnel, Jiangxi Province, China[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 90: 239-248.
[7] 邹铁方,谢荣荣.基于聚类和优序图法的事故再现结果融合方法[J]. 中国公路学报,2022,35(12):219-229.
[8] 陈帆,谢洪涛.基于因子分析与BP网络的地铁施工安全预警研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2012,22(8):85-91.
[9] 蒋频,李远富.基于主成分分析的地铁车站施工风险评估研究[J]. 现代隧道技术,2021,58(1):67-74.
[10] Chen W F, Gong H L, Chen B B, et al. Spatiotemporal evolution of land subsidence around a subway using InSAR time-series and the entropy method[J]. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 2017, 54(1): 78-94.
[11] Wu H W, Zhen J, Zhang J. Urban rail transit operation safety evaluation based on an improved CRITIC method and cloud model[J]. Journal of Rail Transport Planning & Management, 2020, 16: 100206.
[12] 廖东良,路保平.页岩气工程甜点评价方法——以四川盆地焦石坝页岩气田为例[J]. 天然气工业,2018,38(2):43-50.
[13] 杨得虎,朱杰勇,刘帅,等. 基于信息量、加权信息量与逻辑回归耦合模型的云南罗平县崩滑灾害易发性评价对比分析[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报,2023,34(5): 43-53.
[14] Hyun K C, Min S, Choi H, et al. Risk analysis using fault-tree analysis (FTA) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) applicable to shield TBM tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2015, 49: 121-129.
[15] 吴波, 周路, 刘聪. 基于博弈组合赋权-TOPSIS法的富水软岩山岭隧道塌方风险评价[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2023, 23(4): 1726-1733.
[16] Wang Y, Jiang W, Wang M, et al. Risk assessment and implementation of deformation disaster for operation tunnel based on entropy weight-grey relational analysis[J]. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 2022, 13(1): 1831-1848.
[17] 庞劭荣,张诗波,罗龙浩, 等.基于改进云组合赋权的智能网联驾驶场景安全性评价方法[J]. 交通信息与安全,2023,41(5):35-42.
[18] 魏业文, 姜恒, 杨文超, 等. 基于自适应层次分析法和变权理论的输电线路铁塔关键指标体系评价方法[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2022, 22 (8):3144-3151.
[19] Billard L. Symbolic data analysis: what is it?[A]// 17th Symposium on Computational Statistics (COMSTAT 2006)[C]. Rome, Physica-Verlag HD, 2006: 261-269.
[20] 李元昊, 费洋扬, 王卫龙, 等. 基于标记配对相干态光源的实用化诱骗态量子随机数发生器[J]. 密码学报, 2023, 10 (1):73-86.
[21] Brunner N, Cavalcanti D, Pironio S, et al. Bell nonlocality[J]. Reviews of modern physics, 2014, 86 (2): 419.
[22] Huang Z, Zhang W, Zhang J B, et al. Statistics and probability characteristics of typical surface defects of subway tunnels[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 2021, 36: 04021118.
[23] Zhang W, Sun K, Lei C Z, et al. Spencer, B.F. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process synthetic evaluation models for the health monitoring of shield tunnels[J]. Computer-Aided Civil and Inferastructure Engineering. 2014, 29: 676-688.
[24] Rezaei J. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method[J]. Omega-International Journal of Management Science. 2015, 53:49-57.
Outlines

/