Influence of Surrounding Rock Rheology on Long-Term Stress of Segment Lining in Pressure Water Conveyance Tunnel

  • You Zexi ,
  • Zhao Dazhou
Expand
  • 1. College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, P.R. China;
    2. Yellow River Engineering Consulting Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450003, P.R. China

Received date: 2024-10-11

  Online published: 2025-06-13

Abstract

Through the establishment of a nonlinear Nishihara rheological model reflecting the whole process of rock creep, the effects of changes in stress conditions and internal water pressure on the long-term mechanical characteristics of segment lining in a pressure water conveyance tunnel project located in soft rock were studied. The results show that: (1) The radial deformation of segment lining caused by the rheology of surrounding rock increases gradually with the increase of tunnel buried depth. The greater the difference between the initial horizontal and vertical stress values in surrounding rock, the greater the extreme value of radial deformation of segment lining caused by the rheology of surrounding rock. The greater the stress release rate of the surrounding rock, the greater the radial deformation of segment lining caused by the rheology of the surrounding rock. (2) After considering the rheological effect of surrounding rock, the distribution pattern of lining internal force along the ring circumference is basically similar to that of the initial stage, but the values are all changed from the initial stage, among which, the values of axial force are all increased from the initial stage, and after 100 years of project operation, the axial force growth rates of the segment lining for each scheme are between 25.6% and 112.4%, and the average annual growth of the average value of the axial force is between 50 kN/a and 82 kN/a, the extreme value of bending moment is also increased from the initial stage, and its average annual growth is positively correlated with the tunnel buried depth, and the closer the lateral pressure coefficient of surrounding rock is to 1.0, the smaller the average annual increase in bending moment extreme value is. (3) After considering the rheological effect of surrounding rock, the interaction force between segment lining and surrounding rock increases with time, but the extent of increase decreases year by year, and the stress on the lining structure also tends to stabilize gradually. The average annual increase of the interaction force between segment lining and surrounding rock increases with the tunnel buried depth, lateral pressure coefficient, or stress release rate. (4) The differences in the effects of surrounding rock rheology on the long-term stress of segment lining at different internal water pressures are not significant.

Cite this article

You Zexi , Zhao Dazhou . Influence of Surrounding Rock Rheology on Long-Term Stress of Segment Lining in Pressure Water Conveyance Tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2025 , 21(3) : 929 -939 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.03.21

References

[1] 刘方, 胡雄玉, 高峰. 考虑围岩蠕变特性的TBM隧道管片衬砌受力特性研究[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2019, 63(5): 124-128, 173. (Liu Fang, Hu Xiongyu, Gao Feng. Study on the behavior of segmental lining of shield tunnel under creep effect of surrounding rock[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2019, 63(5): 124-128, 173. (in Chinese))
[2] 高春艳. 朱集煤矿巷道围岩流变性状及本构模型研究[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2016. (Gao Chunyan. Study on rheological properties and constitutive model of surrounding rock in Zhuji Coal Mine Roadway[D]. Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, 2016. (in Chinese))
[3] 李宏璧. 高埋深输水隧洞蠕变力学行为及岩爆机理研究[D]. 天津: 天津大学, 2014. (Li Hongbi. Research on creep mechanics behavior and rock burst mechanism of deep-buried water conveyance tunnel[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2014. (in Chinese))
[4] 封坤, 王胤丞, 马文帅, 等. 围岩蠕变对盾构隧道受荷特征影响研究[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2022, 66(8): 117-124+ 131. (Feng Kun, Wang Yincheng, Ma Wenshuai, et al. Influence of surrounding rock creep on loading characteristics of shield tunnel[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2022, 66(8): 117-124+ 131. (in Chinese))
[5] 宋仪, 乔春生, 朱举. 蠕变地层深埋隧道结构长期受力状态研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2020, 57(增1): 343-350. (Song Yi, Qiao Chunsheng, Zhu Ju. Study on long-term stress state of tunnel structure in creep stratum[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2020, 57(Supp. 1): 343-350. (in Chinese))
[6] Zhou Z, Chen Z, He C, et al. Investigation on the evolution characteristics and transfer mechanism of surrounding rock pressure for a hard-rock tunnel under high geo-stress: case study on the Erlang Mountain Tunnel, China[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2021, 80(11): 8339-8361.
[7] 钱文喜, 耿大新, 梁国卿. 围岩蠕变对运营隧道衬砌安全性的影响[J]. 公路交通科技, 2020, 37(9): 90-96. (Qian Wenxi, Geng Daxin, Liang Guoqing. Influence of surrounding rock creep on safety of lining of operating tunnel[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2020, 37(9): 90-96. (in Chinese))
[8] 徐国文, 何川, 汪耀, 等. 流变荷载作用下隧道裂损二次衬砌结构安全性能研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2016, 49(12): 114-123. (Xu Guowen, He Chuan, Wang Yao, et al. Study on the safety performance of cracked secondary lining under action of rheological load[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2016, 49(12): 114-123. (in Chinese))
[9] 张海洋, 徐文杰, 王永刚. 各向异性软岩隧道围岩蠕变特征及支护方案对比分析[J]. 铁道建筑, 2018, 58(8): 71-74. (Zhang Haiyang, Xu Wenjie, Wang Yonggang. Creep characteristics of surrounding rock in anisotropic soft rock tunnel and comparative analysis of supporting schemes[J]. Railway Engineering, 2018, 58(8): 71-74. (in Chinese))
[10] 沈才华, 张兵, 王媛, 等. 基于DP屈服准则的西原本构模型及其运用[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2016, 12(2): 402-406, 483. (Shen Caihua, Zhang Bing, Wang Yuan, et al. The Nishihara constitutive model based on Drucker-Prager yield criterion and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2016, 12(2): 402-406, 483. (in Chinese))
[11] 张亮亮, 王晓健. 考虑黏弹塑性应变分离的岩石复合蠕变模型研究[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 52(5): 1655-1665. (Zhang Liangliang, Wang Xiaojian. Study on composite creep model of rock considering viscoelastic plastic strain separation[J]. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology), 2021, 52(5): 1655-1665. (in Chinese))
[12] 徐卫亚, 杨圣奇, 褚卫江. 岩石非线性黏弹塑性流变模型(河海模型)及其应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2006, 25(3): 433-447. (Xu Weiya, Yang Shengqi, Chu Weijiang. Nonlinear viscoelasto-plastic rheological model (Hohai Model) of rock and its engineering application[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25(3): 433-447. (in Chinese))
[13] Takemura T, Oda M, Kirai H, et al. Microstructural based time-dependent failure mechanism and its relation to geological background[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2012, 53: 76-85.
[14] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于应变软化指标的岩石非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2239-2246, 2256. (Jin Junchao, She Chengxue, Shang Pengyang. A nonlinear creep model of rock based on the strain softening index[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(6): 2239-2246, 2256. (in Chinese))
[15] 潘晓明, 杨钊, 雷春娟, 等. 广义西原粘弹塑流变模型在ABAQUS中开发与应用[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2010, 31(增2): 324-329. (Pan Xiaoming, Yang Zhao, Lei Chunjuan, et al. Secondary development and application of generalized Nishihara viscoelastic-plastic rheological model in ABAQUS[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2010, 31(Supp. 2): 324-329. (in Chinese))
[16] Wang W, Li L Q, Xu W Y, et al. Creep failure mode and criterion of Xiangjiaba sandstone[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2012, 19(12): 3572-3581.
[17] 苏凯, 周小阳, 杨风威, 等. TBM隧洞新型平行四边形管片衬砌结构受力特性研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2020, 53(6): 471-482. (Su Kai, Zhou Xiaoyang, Yang Fengwei, et al. Structure characteristics of a new kind of parallelogram segment lining in TBM tunnel[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2020, 53(6): 471-482. (in Chinese))
[18] 加瑞, 高天润, 杨岗. 施工应力释放和扰动对隧道地震响应影响分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2022, 18(增2): 916-925. (Jia Rui, Gao Tianrun, Yang Gang. Analysis on the influence of construction stress release and disturbance on seismic response of tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2022, 18(Supp. 2): 916-925. (in Chinese))
Outlines

/