Three-Dimensional Lower Bound Limit Analysis of Shallow Buried Tunnel Excavation Face

  • Zhang Yongjuan ,
  • Zhang Jian ,
  • Sun Rui ,
  • Chen Ziang ,
  • Feng Tugen
Expand
  • 1. Research Center of Civil, Hydraulic and Power Engineering of Tibet, Linzhi, Tibet 860000, P.R. China;
    2. College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Tibet Agriculture and Animal Husbandry University, Linzhi, Tibet 860000, P.R. China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Geotechnics and Dike Engineering, Ministry of Education, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, P.R. China;
    4. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, P.R. China

Received date: 2024-06-26

  Online published: 2025-05-06

Abstract

Aiming at the face stability analysis of shallow shield tunnel in sand, the minimum limit support pressure to maintain the face stability obtained by the rigorous three-dimensional lower bound numerical limit analysis calculation codes. The comparison among the calculated results, the upper bound method, the limit equilibrium method and the model test results verifies that the support pressure obtained by the proposed method is the better solution within the theoretical framework of limit analysis. The results show that: The proposed three-dimensional lower bound numerical limit analysis method in this article can directly obtain the ultimate support pressure and failure mechanism of tunnel face. The proposed method can also overcome the limitations from the preset failure mechanism and has high calculation accuracy. The results also show that the internal friction angle affects the failure mechanism of the stratum in front of the excavation face, and then affects the variation law of the ultimate support pressure of the excavation face. When the internal friction angle is small, the whole stratum in front of the excavation face will be unstable and the ultimate support pressure will gradually increase with the increase of the buried depth ratio; When the internal friction angle is large, the stratum in front of the excavation face only produces local instability, and the support pressure is hardly affected by the buried depth ratio. The ultimate support pressure will decrease with increased internal friction angle at different buried depth ratios. The research results further enrich the theoretical results of shield tunnel face stability, and can provide reference for the design of face support pressure in shallow shield tunnel construction.

Cite this article

Zhang Yongjuan , Zhang Jian , Sun Rui , Chen Ziang , Feng Tugen . Three-Dimensional Lower Bound Limit Analysis of Shallow Buried Tunnel Excavation Face[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2025 , 21(2) : 654 -660 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.02.33

References

[1] 袁大军,沈翔,刘学彦,等.泥水盾构开挖面稳定性研究[J].中国公路学报,2017, 30(8):24-37. (Yuan Dajun, Shen Xiang, Liu Xueyan, et al. research on excavation face stability of slurry shield tunneling[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2017, 30(8):24-37. (in Chinese))
[2] 唐晓武,李姣阳,邹金杰,等.浅埋盾构隧道开挖面失稳发展过程模型试验[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2017, 51(5):863-869. (Tang Xiaowu, Li Jiaoyang, Zou Jinjie, et al. Model test of evolution of face instability in shallow shield tunnel [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science),2017, 51(5):863-869. (in Chinese))
[3] 胡雄玉,晏启祥,何川,等.土压平衡盾构掘进对散粒体地层扰动和开挖面破坏特性研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2016,35(8):1618-1627.(Hu Xiongyu, Yan qixian, He Chuan, et al. Study on the disturbance and excavation face failure feature of granular mixtures stratum due to EPB shield tunneling [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2016,35(8): 1618-1627. (in Chinese))
[4] Chen R, Li J, Kong L, et al. Experimental study on face instability of shield tunnel in sand[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013, 33: 12-21.
[5] Idinger G, Aklik P, Wu W, et al. Centrifuge model test on the face stability of shallow tunnel[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2011, 6(2):105-117.
[6] 吕玺琳,曾盛,王远鹏,等.饱和圆砾地层盾构隧道开挖面稳定性物理模型试验[J].岩土工程学报,2019,41,39(增2):129-132. (Lv Xilin, Zeng Sheng, Wang Hanpeng, et al. Physical model tests on stability of shield tunnel face in saturated gravel stratum [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2019,41,39(Supp.2): 129-132. (in Chinese))
[7] 刘海宁,张亚峰,刘汉东,等.砂土地层中泥水盾构掌子面主动破坏模式试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2019,38(3):572-581. (Liu Haining, Zhang Yafeng, Liu Handong, et al. Experimental study on active failure modes of slurry shield-driven tunnel faces in sand [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019,38(3):572-581. (in Chinese))
[8] 宋曙光.渗流作用下复合地层盾构隧道施工开挖面稳定性及控制研究[D].济南:山东大学,2016.(Song Shuguang. Study on Face Stability and Control Technology of EBP Shield-Driving Tunnel in Composite Ground with Consideration of Seepage Condition [D]. Jinan: Shandong University,2016. (in Chinese))
[9] 王林,韩凯航,郭彩霞,等.考虑局部失稳的盾构隧道开挖面挤出破坏数值模拟与理论分析[J].土木工程学报,2020,53(增1):50-56. (Wang Lin, Han Kaihang, Guo Caixia, et al. Numerical simulation and theoretical analysis of passive failure mechanism of shield tunnel face considering partial instability [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal,2020,53 (Supp.1): 50-56. (in Chinese))
[10] 陈仁朋,齐立志,汤旅军,等.砂土地层盾构隧道开挖面被动破坏极限支护力研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2013,32(增1):2877-2882. (Chen Renpeng, Qi Lizhi, Tang Lvjun, et al. Experimental study on active failure modes of slurry shield-driven tunnel faces in sand [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2013,32(Supp.1):2877-2882. (in Chinese))
[11] Anagnostou G. The contribution of horizontal arching to tunnel face stability[J].Geotechnik, 2012, 35(1): 34-44.
[12] Leca E,Dormieux L.Upper and lower bound solutions for the face stability of shallow circular tunnels in frictional material[J].Géotechnique,1990,40(4): 581-606.
[13] Soubra A H. Three-dimensional face stability analysis of shallow circular tunnels[A]// International Conference on Geotechnical and Geological Engineering [C]. Melbourne, 2000:1-6.
[14] Mollon G,Dias D,Soubra A H,et al. Face stability analysis of circular tunnels driven by a pressurized shield[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2010,136(1):215-229.
[15] 王鸿宇,黄茂松,唐震.基于块体剪流组合机构的黏土隧道三维开挖面稳定分析[J].岩土工程学报,2022,44(8):1376-1385. (Wang Hongyu, Huang Maosong, Tang Zhen. Three-dimensional undrained stability analysis of circular tunnels based on a combined mechanism with a translational block and a shear zone [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2022, 44(8):1376-1385. (in Chinese))
[16] Li W, Zhang C, Zhang D, et al. Face stability of shield tunnels considering a kinematically admissible velocity field of soil arching[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 14(2): 505-526.
[17] Krabbenhoft K, Lyamin A V, Sloan S W. Three-dimensional Mohr-Coulomb limit analysis using semidefinite programming[J]. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2008, 24(11): 1107-1119.
[18] 袁帅,冯德旺.考虑渗透系数各向异性的盾构隧道开挖面稳定性数值极限分析[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2020,48(12):1717-1725. (Yuan Shuai, Feng Dewang. Computational limit analysis of shield tunnel face with a consideration of permeability anisotropy [J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science),2020,48(12): 1717-1725. (in Chinese))
[19] Antão A N, da Silva M V, Monteiro N, et al. Upper and lower bounds for three-dimensional undrained stability of shallow tunnels[J]. Transportation Geotechnics, 2021, 27: 100491.
[20] 李修磊,李金凤,杨超.黏土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖面三维稳定性上限分析[J].铁道学报,2021,43(4):166-174. (Li Xiulei, Li Jinfeng, Yang Chao. Upper-bound solutions for three-dimensional excavation face stability of shallow shield tunnel in cohesive-frictional soils [J]. Journal of The China Railway Society,2021,43(4):166-174. (in Chinese))
[21] MOSEK A P S. The MOSEK C optimizer API manual, version10.1[EB/OL]. https://www.Mosek.com/.2023-10-01.
[22] Golub G H, Loan C F. Matrix computations[M]. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
Outlines

/