Research Progress of the Large Deformation of Layered Surrounding Rock Tunnel with High in Situ Stress

  • Liu Xufeng ,
  • Pan Pengzhi ,
  • Xu Dingping ,
  • Zhou Yangyi ,
  • Wang Zhaofeng
Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Safety, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, P.R. China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education on Safe Mining of Deep Metal Mines, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, P.R. China

Received date: 2024-05-14

  Online published: 2025-01-22

Abstract

Large deformation of layered rock mass is a common engineering disaster in tunnel construction, especially in high in situ environment. Due to the influence of high stress and bedding structure, the surrounding rock of the tunnel will undergo typical failure modes such as extensive cracking, shearing, and buckling along the bedding planes, resulting in the failure of the support structure, seriously endangering personal safety and restricting the progress of the project. To fully understand the characteristics of large deformation of high stress layered rock masses and guide on-site construction, the current research status at home and abroad was reviewed and summarized from the geological and mechanical characteristics of layered rock masses, the characteristics, mechanisms, grading, and prevention and control of large deformation of layered rock masses. In response to the existing problems and new development trends in the mechanism and prevention of large deformation of high stress layered rock masses, key scientific and technological issues that need to be urgently addressed were discussed.

Cite this article

Liu Xufeng , Pan Pengzhi , Xu Dingping , Zhou Yangyi , Wang Zhaofeng . Research Progress of the Large Deformation of Layered Surrounding Rock Tunnel with High in Situ Stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2024 , 20(S2) : 1007 -1020 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2024.S2.58

References

[1] 田四明,王伟,杨昌宇,等. 中国铁路隧道40年发展与展望[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2021, 41(11): 1903-1930.
[2] 杨木高. 木寨岭隧道大变形控制技术[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2019, 56(2): 175-181.
[3] 中铁第一勘察设计院. 铁路挤压性围岩隧道技术规范(Q/CR 95212019)[S]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社, 2019.
[4] 彭建兵,崔鹏,庄建琦. 川藏铁路对工程地质提出的挑战[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2020,39(12): 2377-2389.
[5] 钟山,江权,冯夏庭,等. 锦屏深部地下实验室初始地应力测量实践[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(1): 356-366.
[6] 蔡美峰. 深部开采围岩稳定性与岩层控制关键理论和技术[J].采矿与岩层控制工程学报, 2020, 2(3): 1-9.
[7] 李廷春. 毛羽山隧道高地应力软岩大变形施工控制技术[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2011, 48(2): 59-67.
[8] 李国良,朱永全. 乌鞘岭隧道高地应力软弱围岩大变形控制技术[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2008(3): 54-59.
[9] 张祉道. 家竹箐隧道施工中支护大变形的整治[J]. 世界隧道, 1997(1): 7-16.
[10] 陈志敏,余云燕,李国良,等. 基于原岩应力的关角隧道变形潜势研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2018, 55(4): 33-41.
[11] 李磊,谭忠盛,郭小龙,等. 挤压陡倾千枚岩地层小净距隧道大变形研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(2): 276-286.
[12] Mercier L F, Hadjigeorgiou J. Towards a better understanding of squeezing potential in hard rock mines[J]. Mining Technology, 2013, 120(1): 36-44.
[13] Cui G, Qi J, Wang D.Research on large deformation control technology of tunnels in squeezing rock and its application[J]. Science Progress, 2020, 103(2): 39847652.
[14] Sharifzadeh M. Strategies for managing large derormations at CSA underground mine[A] // 14th ISRM Congress[C]. 2019: 13-18.
[15] Mercier-Langevin F,Hadjigeorgiou J. Towards a better understanding of squeezing potential in hard rock mines[J]. Mining Technology, 2011, 120(1): 36-44.
[16] Jaeger J C. Shear failure of anisotropic rocks[J]. Geological Magazine, 1960, 97(1): 65-72.
[17] Niandou H, Shao J F, Henry J P, et al. Laboratory investigation of the mechanical behaviour of Tournemire shale[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1997, 34(1): 3-16.
[18] 王思敬, 张晓平. 岩石单轴压缩条件下裂纹扩展试验研究——以片状岩石为例[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(9): 1772-1781.
[19] Xu G, He C, Su A, et al. Experimental investigation of the anisotropic mechanical behavior of phyllite under triaxial compression[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2018, 104: 100-112.
[20] Kim K Y, Zhuang L, Yang H, et al. Strength anisotropy of berea sandstone: Results of X-ray computed tomography, compression tests, and discrete modeling[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2016, 49(4): 1201-1210.
[21] 衡帅,杨春和,张保平,等. 页岩各向异性特征的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(3): 609-616.
[22] 姚家李,姚华彦,代领,等.各向异性片麻岩点荷载与单轴压缩力学特性研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2021,17(4):1038-1044.
[23] Chen J, Liu W, Chen L, et al. Failure mechanisms and modes of tunnels in monoclinic and soft-hard interbedded rocks: A case study[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2020, 24(4): 1357-1373.
[24] Meng L, Tianbin L I, Jiang Y, et al. Characteristics and mechanisms of large deformation in the Zhegu mountain tunnel on the Sichuan―Tibet highway[J]. Tunnelling & Underground Space Technology Incorporating Trenchless Technology Research, 2013, 37(6): 157-164.
[25] 侯振坤,杨春和,郭印同,等. 单轴压缩下龙马溪组页岩各向异性特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(9): 2541-2550.
[26] Liu X F, Feng X T, Zhou Y. Influences of schistosity structure and differential stress on failure and strength behaviors of an anisotropic foliated rock under true triaxial compression[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2022,56(2):1273-1287.
[27] Mogi K. Experimental Rock Mechanics[M]. Taylor and Francis, London, U.K. 2006.
[28] Kwas'niewski M A, Mogi K. Faulting in an anisotropic, schistose rock under general triaxial compression[A] //Proc., 4th North Am. Rock Mech. Symp[C]. Balkema, Rotterdam, 2000:737-746.
[29] Liu X F, Feng X T, Zhou Y Y. Experimental study of mechanical behavior of gneiss considering the orientation of schistosity under true triaxial compression[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2020, 11(20): 04020199.
[30] Liu X F, Feng X T, Zhou Y Y, et al. Influences of foliation orientation and lateral stress difference on the deformation and fracturing of a thin-layered rock around underground excavations: Insight from multi-axial loading tests[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2022, 81(5): 171.
[31] 刘旭锋,周扬一. 多轴压缩条件下层状硬质片岩的力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2213-2221.
[32] Cai M. Influence of intermediate principal stress on rock fracturing and strength near excavation boundaries—Insight from numerical modeling[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2008, 45(5): 763-772.
[33] 刘志春,朱永全,李文江,等. 挤压性围岩隧道大变形机理及分级标准研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008(5): 690-697.
[34] 李满宏. 哈达铺隧道变形的成因分析及对策研究[J]. 铁道勘察, 2012, 38(6): 73-75.
[35] 侯国强. 成兰铁路茂县隧道大变形特征及施工技术[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2019, 39(5): 868-875.
[36] 宋章,杜宇本,陶玉敬,等. 强震区成兰铁路某隧道大变形地质成因分析[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2016, 33(10): 90-96.
[37] 郭健,阳军生,陈维,等. 基于现场实测的炭质板岩隧道围岩大变形与衬砌受力特征研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(4): 832-841.
[38] 吴迪,陈子全,甘林卫,等. 高地应力深埋层状围岩隧道非对称变形受力机制研究[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2018, 38(11): 1813-1821.
[39] Mezger F, Anagnostou G, Ziegler H J. The excavation-induced convergences in the Sedrun section of the Gotthard Base Tunnel[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013, 38: 447-463.
[40] Terzaghi K. Rock defects and loads in tunnel supports. Rock tunneling with steel supports[M]. 1946.
[41] 李天斌,孟陆波,王兰生. 高地应力隧道稳定性及岩爆、大变形灾害防治[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2016.
[42] Barla G B. Tunnelling under squeezing rock conditions[EB/OL]. https//www.researchgate.net/publication/259762638.
[43] Steiner W. Tunnelling in squeezing rocks: Case histories[J]. Rock Mechanics & Rock Engineering, 1996, 29(4): 211-246.
[44] Aydan O, Akagi T, Kawamoto T. The squeezing potential of rocks around tunnels[J]. Theory and Prediction, 1993, 26 (2), 137-163.
[45] 陈宗基. 地下巷道长期稳定性的力学问题[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 1982 (1): 1-20.
[46] 何满潮,景海河,孙晓明. 软岩工程力学[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2002.
[47] 田四明. 堡镇隧道高地应力炭质页岩的变形破坏机制[J]. 北京交通大学学报, 2013, 37(1): 21-26.
[48] Karampinos E, Hadjigeorgiou J. Quantifying the influence of structure, rock mass strength and mining development of drives in squeezing ground[J]. Mining Technology, 2018, 127(4): 177-194.
[49] Singh B, Jethwa J L, Dube A K, et al. Correlation between observed support pressure and rock mass quality[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1992, 7(1): 59-74.
[50] Jethwa J, Singh B. Estimation of ultimate rock pressure for tunnel linings under squeezing rock conditions- a new approach[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science & Geomechaincs Abstracts, 1984: 231-238.
[51] Hoek E, Marinos P. Predicting tunnel squeezing problems in weak heterogeneous rock masses[J]. Tunnels & Tunnelling International, 2000, 32(11): 45-51.
[52] 张祉道. 关于挤压性围岩隧道大变形的探讨和研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2003(2): 5-12.
[53] 喻渝. 挤压性围岩支护大变形的机理及判定方法[J]. 世界隧道, 1998(1): 46-51.
[54] 李国良,熊春庚,李宁. 挤压性围岩隧道变形潜势的判定[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2018, 35(8): 55-59.
[55] 陈子全,何川,吴迪,等. 高地应力层状软岩隧道大变形预测分级研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2018, 53(6): 1237-1244.
[56] 巩江峰,朱勇,张广泽. 层状围岩隧道大变形等级判别及处理[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2018, 35(12): 51-55.
[57] 张广泽,冯君,易勇进,等. 隧道大变形机理及分类分级探讨[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2020, 64(10):77-82.
[58] 陈子全,何川,吴迪,等. 高地应力层状软岩隧道大变形预测分级研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2018, 53(6): 1237-1244.
[59] 冯夏庭,周扬一,刘旭锋,等. 一种勘察设计阶段隧道围岩大变形分级方法[P]. CN110513146B, 2020-12-01.
[60] 孟陆波,黄意霖,李天斌,等. 高地应力层状软岩隧道非对称挤压大变形分级修正方法研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2022, 41(1): 147-156.
[61] 侯朝炯,勾攀峰. 巷道锚杆支护围岩强度强化机理研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2000(3): 342-345.
[62] 何满潮,高尔新. 软岩巷道耦合支护力学原理及其应用[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 1998(2): 3-6.
[63] 江权,冯夏庭,李邵军,等. 高应力下大型硬岩地下洞室群稳定性设计优化的裂化-抑制法及其应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报. 2019, 38(6): 1081-1101.
[64] Rabcewicz V. The New Austrian Tunnelling Method[J]. Water Power, 1964, 6: 511-515.
[65] 王建宇. 理念的更新——对软弱围岩隧道工程的思考[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2018, 55(6): 1-10.
[66] 张顶立,孙振宇,陶伟明. 隧道围岩大变形灾害特点与主动控制方法[J].铁道标准设计, 2023, 67(1): 1-9.
[67] 康永水,耿志,刘泉声,等.我国软岩大变形灾害控制技术与方法研究进展[J].岩土力学, 2022(8): 1-25.
[68] 李小勇,贾晓刚. 新意法在国内隧道工程中的应用研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2017,13(增2):715-719.
[69] 肖广智. 我国几类特殊地质条件铁路隧道修建问题与对策概述[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2019, 39(11): 1748-1758.
[70] 李利平,贾超,孙子正,等. 深部重大工程灾害监测与防控技术研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 52(8): 2539-2556.
[71] 潘文韬,何川,吴枋胤,等.层状软岩隧道超前支护及锚杆定向预加固研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2023,19(2):571-585.
[72] Xu D P, Liu X Y, Jiang Q, et al. A local homogenization approach for simulating the reinforcement effect of the fully grouted bolt in deep underground openings[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2022, 32(2): 247-259.
[73] 于国亮,娄义黎,吴国鹏,等. 高地应力下顺层偏压隧道开挖变形控制技术研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022, 59(5): 237-245.
[74] 崔光耀,魏杭杭,王明胜. 高地应力强风化炭质板岩隧道大变形控制现场试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022, 59(3): 183-189, 200.
[75] 郭小龙,谭忠盛,喻渝. 成兰铁路软岩隧道大变形控制技术及变形控制基准研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2022, 44(3): 86-104.
[76] 陶志刚,罗森林,李梦楠,等. 层状板岩隧道大变形控制参数优化数值模拟分析及现场试验[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2020, 39(3): 491-506.
[77] 马杲宇,何川,陈子全,等. 基于蠕变损伤演化模型的深部高地应力隧道双层初期支护力学特性研究[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 52(8): 2897-2909.
[78] Li S, Tan Z, Yang Y. Mechanical analyses and controlling measures for large deformations of inclined and laminar stratum during tunnelling[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2020, 38:3095-3112.
[79] 汪波,王振宇,郭新新,等. 软岩隧道中基于快速预应力锚固支护的变形控制技术[J]. 中国公路学报, 2021, 34(3): 171-182.
[80] 李术才,徐飞,李利平,等. 隧道工程大变形研究现状、问题与对策及新型支护体系应用介绍[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2016, 35(7): 1366-1376.
[81] 陈建勋,刘伟伟,陈丽俊,等. 绿泥石片岩地层大跨度公路隧道大变形控制及合理支护形式现场试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33(12): 212-223.
[82] 李磊,谭忠盛,郭小龙,等. 高地应力陡倾互层千枚岩地层隧道大变形研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2017, 36(7): 1611-1622.
[83] 戴永浩,陈卫忠,田洪铭,等. 大梁隧道软岩大变形及其支护方案研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(增2): 4149-4156.
[84] 冯夏庭, 赵曰茂. 一种结构精简化的大变形吸能锚杆[P].中国专利: CN108547649B, 2020-04-07.
[85] 何满潮,冯吉利. 恒阻大变形锚杆[P].中国专利: CN101858225A, 2010-10-13.
[86] 王贺,陈何,曹辉. 我国大变形锚杆研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 黄金科学技术, 2020, 28(1): 112-123.
[87] 康红普,冯志强. 煤矿巷道围岩注浆加固技术的现状与发展趋势[J]. 煤矿开采, 2013, 18(3): 1-7.
[88] 徐光亮,刘旭锋. 煤矿破碎围岩注浆加固技术研究现状分析[J]. 煤矿安全, 2016, 47(1): 174-177.
[89] 刘旭锋,熊祖强,刘成威,等. 新型注浆材料综合锚注治理大巷底鼓技术[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2016, 44(11): 24-29.
[90] 丁秀丽,张雨霆,黄书岭,等. 隧洞围岩大变形机制、挤压大变形预测及应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2023, 42(3): 521-544.
[91] 鲜国. 成兰铁路不良地质隧道建造关键技术创新与实践(典型案例汇编篇)[M]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2020.
[92] Karampinos E, Hadjigeorgiou J, Hazzard J, et al. Discrete element modelling of the buckling phenomenon in deep hard rock mines[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2015, 80: 346-356.
Outlines

/