In order to study the dynamic response characteristics of the soil around the pile under impact load and the reasonable values of soil dynamic parameters, dynamic triaxial tests were conducted on the muddy soil in Foshan using the SPAX-2000 dynamic -static true triaxial system. The response law of surrounding pressure, vibration frequency and frequency to dynamic Shear stress, liquefaction stress ratio, damping ratio and dynamic modulus of soil under impact load. The results show that: (1) The variation law of soil dynamic shear stress shows that the dynamic shear stress increases with the increase of confining pressure or vibration frequency, and decreases with the increase of vibration frequency. The surrounding pressure varies from 100 kPa to 400 kPa, the dynamic shear stress decreases from 67.1% to 45.2%. The dynamic shear stress at a frequency of 10 Hz is higher than that of 1 Hz by 44.3% to 72.6%. The surrounding pressure, vibration frequency and number of vibrations have a great influence on the dynamic strength of soil. (2) The variation law of dynamic modulus of soil parameters shows that the dynamic modulus of each deformation stage (initial modulus, average loading modulus, maximum loading modulus, and unloading modulus) is significantly affected by surrounding pressure and vibration frequency. The dynamic modulus increases with the increase of vibration frequency or confining pressure. (3) The variation law of soil damping ratio shows that the damping ratio decreases approximately linearly with the increase of confining pressure. When the confining pressure varies from 100 kPa to 400 kPa, the damping ratio is reduced from 0.285 to 0.153, and the vibration frequency has no obvious effect on the damping ratio. The research results can provide reference for the design of pipe piles, dynamic parameters for high-strain test analysis or similar projects.
Liu Yongjian
,
Fu Yangpan
,
Huang Chengze
. Experimental Study on the Dynamic Characteristics of Muddy Soil in Foshan[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2024
, 20(S2)
: 674
-680
.
DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2024.S2.19
[1] 陈凡,徐天平,陈久照,等. 基桩质量检测技术[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版,2014.
[2] 陈荣保,张季超,等.基于原位测试的泥质粉砂岩预应力管桩承载机理研究[J].广东土木与建筑, 2018,25(10):5-9.
[3] 廖广超,伍钊源,李彰明,等.管桩高应变试验条件下桩周粉质黏土动三轴试验研究[J].广东土木与建筑,2019,26(2): 29-32.
[4] 胡永强,汤连生,林沛元. 华南典型路基红黏土动力学特性动三轴试验分析[J]. 自然灾害学报, 2018,27(6):34-41.
[5] 田兆阳,李平,郑志华,等.软土动力特性动三轴试验研究[J].地震工程学报,2017,29(1):95-99,118.
[6] 周健,简琦薇. 循环荷载下老黏土的动力特性试验研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2013,9(6): 1248-1256.
[7] 张娇,张雁,李青,等.上海黏性土的初始剪切模量试验研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2017,13(2):337-343.
[8] 刘超,屈俊童,段自侠,等. 洱海泥炭质土动剪切模量和阻尼比试验研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2021,17(5):1479-1485.
[9] 赖夏蕾,简文彬,许旭堂.福州淤泥质土动力特性室内试验研究[J].工程地质学报,2016,24(6):132-138.
[10] 何昌荣. 动模量和阻尼的动三轴试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,1997,19(2):39-48.
[11] 丁祖德,黄娟,袁铁映,等.昆明泥炭质土动剪切模量与阻尼比的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学,2017,38(12): 3627-3634.
[12] 商金华,徐西永,王国富,等. 济南市区土体动剪切模量比和阻尼比的统计分析[J]. 长江科学院院报,2018,35(8):56-60.
[13] 黄承泽.PHC桩桩周土静动特性试验及高应变曲线拟合法应用分析[D].广州:广东工业大学,2019.
[14] 李博,孙富学.海洋环境下人工胶结土长期动力特性研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2015,11(4):889-895.
[15] 刘帅,高志华,胡波,等. 变围压循环荷载作用下珠江三角洲软土动力特性试验研究[J]. 中山大学学报 (自然科学版),2023,26(4):131-138.
[16] 王国才,徐启鹏,刘祎阳,等. 地铁列车荷载下软土的动力响应和长期沉降分析[J]. 浙江工业大学学报,2022,50(4):186-191.