Analysis of Segment Floating Law and Control Effect of Large Diameter Shield Segment in Shallow Overburden Soil

  • Li Haibin ,
  • Yü Liucheng ,
  • Li Mingyu ,
  • Chen Jian ,
  • Wang Yue
Expand
  • 1. Jinan Traffic Engineering Quality and Safety Center, Jinan 250102, P. R. China;
    2. School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, P. R. China;
    3. China Railway 14th Bureau Group Mega Shield Engineering Co., Ltd., Nanjing 211800, P. R. China;
    4. China Railway Construction Underwater Tunnel Engineering Laboratory, Jinan 250101, P. R. China;
    5. China Railway 14th Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Jinan 250101, P. R. China

Received date: 2024-04-24

  Online published: 2025-01-03

Abstract

Large-diameter shield tunnels have been widely used in various river crossing traffic projects, and the problem of segments upward moving is prominent. Based on the Jinan Yellow River tunnel project, the middle section and the receiving section of the Yellow River were selected for on-site monitoring of segments upward moving, respectively. Combined with the indoor grout proportioning test, a comparative analysis of the law of segments upward moving of large diameter slurry shield tunnel in different test sections and the effect of treatment measures was conducted. The results show that when the large-diameter shield tunnel at the powdery clay formation is driven in the section with a buried depth of 2.5D and water pressure of 0.4 MPa, the process from the completion of segment assembly to uplift stability can be roughly divided into four stages: initial deformation stage (floating accounts for 22%), rapid floating stage (floating accounts for 55%), gentle floating stage (floating accounts for 28%) and slow settlement stage (settlement accounts for 5%); In the section with a buried depth of 1.6D and water pressure of 0.2 MPa, the percentage of segment elevation increments in each stage differed by 3%, 8%, -14%, and 3%, and the uplift period was extended by 2 times; The best time to control the segment uplift is within 10 hours of starting synchronous grouting and the comprehensive measures adopted in the project can effectively control segment uplift. Only grouting in the vault area has the most obvious control effect on segment uplift.

Cite this article

Li Haibin , Yü Liucheng , Li Mingyu , Chen Jian , Wang Yue . Analysis of Segment Floating Law and Control Effect of Large Diameter Shield Segment in Shallow Overburden Soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2024 , 20(6) : 2000 -2009 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2024.06.26

References

[1] 袁大军, 吴俊, 沈翔, 等. 超高水压越江海长大盾构隧道工程安全[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33(12): 26-45. (Yuan Dajun, Wu Jun, Shen Xiang, et al. Engineering safety of cross-river or cross-sea long-distance large-diameter shield tunneling under superhigh water pressure[J]. China Journal of highway and transport, 2020, 33(12): 26-45. (in Chinese))
[2] Chen X S, Zhang S L, Zhou X H, et al. Parameter analysis of excavation face stability of shield tunnel under high water pressure seepage[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2022, 128: 103218.
[3] 万泽恩, 李树忱, 陈健, 等. 大直径泥水盾构穿越复杂环境地表垂直变形研究[J]. 应用基础与工程科学学报, 2021, 29(2): 399-411. (Wan Ze'en, Li Shuchen, Chen Jian, et al. Study on ground vertical deformation of large-diameter slurry shield tunneling in complicated environment[J]. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering, 2021, 29(2): 399-411. (in Chinese))
[4] 曾学艺, 梁禹, 李科, 等. 浅覆大直径越江盾构隧道施工阶段管片上浮分析及控制措施研究[J]. 铁道建筑, 2017(5):71-75. (Zeng Xueyi, Liang Yu, Li Ke, et al. Analysis and control measures of segment floating in construction stage of shallow overburden large diameter shield tunnel[J]. Railway Engineering, 2017(5): 71-75. (in Chinese))
[5] 付艳斌, 梅超, 卞跃威, 等. 考虑注浆填充率的大直径盾构管片上浮解析解与应用[J]. 中国公路学报, 2022, 35(11): 171-179. (Fu Yanbin, Mei Chao, Bian Yuewei, et al. Analytical solution and application of large-diameter shield segments uplift considering the filling rate of grouting[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(11): 171-179. (in Chinese))
[6] 张强. 盾构隧道通缝拼装管片的上浮和错台研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2007. (Zhang Qiang. Research on rising displacement and dislocation of shield tunnel segment with straight joint[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2007. (in Chinese))
[7] 董赛帅, 杨平, 姜春阳, 等. 盾构隧道管片上浮机理与控制分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2016, 12(1): 49-54. (Dong Saishuai, Yang Ping, Jiang Chunyang, et al. Analysis of mechanism and controls of segment floating of shield tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2016, 12(1): 49-54. (in Chinese))
[8] 李明宇, 吴龙骥, 赵世永, 等. 盾构管片上浮量变化规律及简化算法研究[J]. 公路, 2021 (3): 337-341. (Li Mingyu, Wu Longji, Zhao Shiyong, et al. Research on the simplified calculation method of segment uplift of shield tunnel[J]. Highway, 2021(3): 337-341. (in Chinese))
[9] 黄钟晖, 舒瑶, 季昌, 等. 基于等效梁模型的盾构隧道施工期管片上浮影响因素权重分析[J]. 隧道建设, 2016, 36(11): 1295-1301. (Huang Zhonghui, Shu Yao, Ji Chang, et al. Analysis of weight of influencing factors of shield tunnel segment uplifting during construction based on equivalent beam model[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2016, 36(11): 1295-1301. (in Chinese))
[10] Kasper T, Meschke G. A numerical study of the effect of soil and grout material properties and cover depth in shield tunnelling[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2006, 33(4): 234-247.
[11] Kasper T, Meschke G. On the influence of face pressure, grouting pressure and TBM design in soft ground tunnelling[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2006, 21(2): 160-171.
[12] Gong Q M, Zhao Y, Zhou J H, et al. Uplift resistance and progressive failure mechanisms of metro shield tunnel in soft clay[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 82: 222-234.
[13] 黄旭民, 黄林冲, 梁禹. 施工期同步注浆影响下盾构隧道管片纵向上浮特征分析与应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2021, 43(9): 1700-1707. (Huang Xumin, Huang Linchong, Liang Yu. Analysis and application of longitudinal uplift characteristics of segments of shield tunnels affected by synchronous grouting during construction period[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 43(9): 1700-1707. (in Chinese))
[14] 魏纲, 赵毅, 孙樵. 基坑开挖下抗浮锚杆对盾构隧道控制效果预测[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2022, 18(2): 603-610. (Wei Gang, Zhao Yi, Sun Qiao. Prediction of control effect of anti-floating anchor on Shield tunnel under foundation pit excavation[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2022, 18(2): 603-610. (in Chinese))
[15] 施有志, 阮建凑, 林树枝. 海底盾构隧道管片上浮分析及控制研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2022, 18(5): 1665-1677. (Shi Youzhi, Ruan Jiancou, Li Shuzhi. Floating analysis and control of subsea shield tunnel segment[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2022, 18(5): 1665-1677. (in Chinese))
[16] 乔世范, 檀俊坤, 郭佳奇, 等. 基于浆液稠度时空变化的盾构隧道壁后注浆扩散机制[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 52(3): 713-724. (Qiao Shifan, Tan Junkun, Guo Jiaqi, et al. Grouting diffusion mechanism after shield wall based on spatial and temporal variation of slurry consistency[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2021, 52(3): 713-724. (in Chinese))
[17] 叶飞, 王斌, 韩鑫, 等. 盾构隧道壁后注浆试验与浆液扩散机理研究进展[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33(12): 92-104. (Ye Fei, Wang Bin, Han Xin, et al. Review of shield tunnel backfill grouting tests and its diffusion mechanism[J]. China Journal of highway and transport, 2020, 33(12): 92-104. (in Chinese))
[18] 杨琪, 耿萍, 唐睿, 等. 非饱和地层中盾构隧道壁后注浆浆液渗透扩散机理[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2020, 41(6): 100-108. (Yang Qi, Geng Ping, Tang Rui, et al. Slurry seepage and diffusion mechanism of shield tunnel backfilling grouting in unsaturated stratum[J]. China Railway Science, 2020, 41(6): 100-108. (in Chinese))
[19] 周彦伯. 不同扩散模式下盾构隧道壁后注浆规律研究[D]. 泉州: 华侨大学, 2019. (Zhou Yanbo. Study on grouting behind shield tunnel wall under different diffusion modes[D]. Quanzhou: Huaqiao University, 2019. (in Chinese))
[20] 蔡德国, 叶飞, 曹凯, 等. 砂性地层盾构隧道壁后注浆浆液扩散室内试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2018, 31(10): 274-283. (Cai Deguo, Ye Fei, Cao Kai, et al. Test of grout diffusion of shield tunnel backfill grouting in sandy strata[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2018, 31(10): 274-283. (in Chinese))
[21] 周佳媚, 覃青松, 张雨帆. 考虑稠度空间分布的盾构壁后注浆扩散模型[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2023, 19(1): 61-68. (Zhou Jiamei, Qin Qingsong, Zhang Yufan, et al. Diffusion model of grouting behind shield wall considering the spatial distribution of consistency[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2023, 19(1): 61-68. (in Chinese))
[22] 张君, 赵林, 周佳媚, 等. 盾构隧道管片上浮的机制研究[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2016, 60(10): 88-93. (Zhang Jun, Zhao Lin, Zhou Jiamei, et al. Research on upward moving mechanism for segment of shield tunnel[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2016, 60(10): 88-93. (in Chinese))
[23] 余浩. 盾构隧道壁后可硬性浆液配比优化试验研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2011. (Yu Hao. The optimization test research for the ratio of concrete back fill grouting the segment in shield tunneling[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2011. (in Chinese))
[24] 李明宇, 余刘成, 陈健, 等. 粉质黏土中大直径泥水盾构隧道管片上浮及错台现场测试分析[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2022, 19(6): 1705-1715. (Li Mingyu, Yu Liucheng, Chen Jian, et al. In situ test analysis of segment uplift and dislocation of large-diameter slurry shield tunnel in silty clay[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022, 19(6): 1705-1715. (in Chinese))
[25] 谢文斌, 黄伟东, 白云. 软土地层盾构隧道施工期监测分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2015, 11(1): 190-198. (Xie Wenbin, Huang Weidong, Bai Yun. Analysis on the monitoring of shield tunnel construction period in soft soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2015, 11(1): 190-198. (in Chinese))
[26] 赵迪. 苏州软土地层中盾构隧道结构及地层长期沉降规律研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2021. (Zhao Di. Research on long-term settlement laws of shield tunnel and stratum in Suzhou soft soil area[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2021. (in Chinese))
Outlines

/