Research on MJS Reinforcement Effect of Large Section Rectangular Pipe Jacking Underpass Pipeline

  • Xu Ping ,
  • Zhang Angran ,
  • Zhang Ruiduo ,
  • Wang Xiangliang
Expand
  • 1. School of Water and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, P. R. China;
    2. Zhangjiagang Jiangsu Transportation Bureau, Zhangjiagang, Jiangsu 215600, P. R. China;
    3. Zhengzhou Metro Limited Company, Zhengzhou 450000, P. R. China;
    4. China Construction Communications Construction Group Limited Company Henan Branch,Zhengzhou 450004, P. R. China

Received date: 2024-04-13

  Online published: 2024-09-30

Abstract

A large cross-section rectangular pipe jacking construction is used at the 8th entrance and exit of one station in Zhengzhou Metro Line 3, which needs to vertically underpass a DN2000 sewage pipeline in near distance. The soil under the sewage pipeline bottom is reinforced with MJS construction method. Real-time monitoring of surface and pipeline displacement during the pipe jacking process is carried out, numerical simulation is compared with actual measurement results, and the accuracy of the numerical model and the rationality of MJS pipe bottom soil reinforcement measures are verified, With the help of three-dimensional numerical calculations, it is found that the surface settlement, vertical displacement, horizontal displacement, bending moment and shear force of the pipeline with MJS reinforcement can be reduced about 53.59%, 38.13%, 73.3%, 57.3%, and 48.02% respectively compared to the unreinforced soil, and so MJS can significantly improve the bearing capacity, density, strength, and elastic modulus of the soil under the sewage pipeline bottom, and fix and protect the pipeline. Further analysis is conducted on the impact of grouting replacement rate, reinforcement width, and reinforcement depth of MJS on sewage pipeline deformation, and recommendations are provided about grouting replacement rate, reinforcement width and reinforcement depth, which provide reference and inspiration for similar projects.

Cite this article

Xu Ping , Zhang Angran , Zhang Ruiduo , Wang Xiangliang . Research on MJS Reinforcement Effect of Large Section Rectangular Pipe Jacking Underpass Pipeline[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2024 , 20(S1) : 463 -471 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2024.S1.54

References

[1] Chen X L, Ma B S, Najafi M, et al. Long rectangular box jacking project: a case study [J]. Underground Space, 2021, 6(2): 101-125.
[2] Wang H, Qin W M, Jiao Y Y. Stability assessment for highway with large-span box culvert jacking underneath: a case study [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2013, 50(6): 585-594.
[3] 徐宏, 叶飞, 刘奇, 等. 大断面矩形顶管施工地层变形及顶进参数控制研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022, 59(6): 97-105.
[4] 郑知斌, 李名淦, 闫朝涛, 等. 北京首条矩形顶管风险防控设计与沉降分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2021, 17(4): 1281-1290.
[5] 吴波, 彭逸勇, 蒙国往, 等. 软土地层大断面矩形顶管施工引起切口前方地表隆起分析[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021, 58(2): 86-92.
[6] 吴垠龙, 刘维, 贾鹏蛟, 等. 矩形顶管近距离上穿既有隧道施工扰动分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2022, 18(6): 1968-1978.
[7] 许有俊, 史明, 李育发, 等. 大断面土压平衡矩形顶管施工引起地表竖向变形研究[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2020, 53(7): 597-604.
[8] 佘芳涛, 吴征奇, 周伟踪, 等. 考虑关键施工参数的矩形顶管隧道围岩变形控制分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44(增1): 247-253.
[9] 周小淇, 史培新, 刘维, 等. 富水软弱地层矩形混凝土顶管施工地表沉降研究[J]. 北京交通大学学报, 2021, 45(3): 69-76.
[10] 尹荣申, 杨伟超, 张平平, 等. 多孔大断面矩形顶管施工的地层变形特征及演化规律[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2018, 15(10): 2597-2605.
[11] 吴列成, 黄德中, 邱龑. 大断面矩形顶管法地铁车站施工沉降控制技术实践——以上海轨道交通14号线静安寺站工程为例[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2021, 41(9): 1585-1593.
[12] 周朋. MJS 工法在砂卵石地层盾构近距离下穿运营地铁隧道的应用[J]. 都市快轨交通, 2018(6): 122-128.
[13] 蒋力, 李强. 全方位高压喷射工法在杭州地铁盾构下穿既有线工程中的应用[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2021, 24(8): 192-197.
[14] 张品, 钟志全, 陈仁朋, 等. MJS桩加固对上覆地铁运营隧道影响研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2019, 15(4): 1164-1171.
[15] 熊仲明, 覃泽宏, 蔡虹, 等. 富水砂层盾构始发MJS工法桩的应用及分析[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2021, 38(3): 8-12.
Outlines

/