To investigate the effect of pre-blast hole damage and in-situ stress on the evolution of damage in the smooth blasting of rocks at different burial depths, the damage threshold of 0.5 was first determined for the RHT model applicable to smooth blasting using 2D numerical simulations. A 3D model was then established and the ANSYS-DYNA implicit-explicit sequence solution method was used to apply in-situ stress to the model, and the equivalent stiffness was discounted to account for the damage of the pre-blast hole to investigate the distribution of rock damage in space. The results show that the presence of in-situ stress has an inhibitory effect on the deep rock blasting damage, and this inhibitory effect will increase with the depth of burial. The pre-blast hole damage to the rock catalyses the next smooth blasting to break the rock. When smooth blasting is carried out at different burial depths, the choice of the best smooth blasting layer thickness and the smooth blasting hole spacing is not the same. When considering both the pre-blast hole damage and the impact of in-situ stress, if the depth of burial is small, the two values should be appropriate to increase, if the depth of burial is larger, the two values should be appropriate to reduce with the increase in depth.
Yu Lingling
,
Zhang Fei
,
He Wenkai
. Numerical Simulation of Smooth Blasting Considering In-Situ Stress and Pre-Blast Hole Damage[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2024
, 20(2)
: 636
-644
.
DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2024.02.30
[1]Read R. 20 years of excavation response studies at AECL's underground research laborator[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, 2004, 41(8): 1251-1275.
[2]Yang L, Yang R, Qu G, et al. Caustic study on blast-induced wing crack behaviors in dynamic-static superimposed stress field[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2014, 24(4): 417-423.
[3]Yang R, Ding C, Yang L, et al. Model experiment on dynamic behavior of jointed rock mass under blasting at high-stress conditions[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 74: 145-152.
[4]Yang J, Yao C, Jiang Q, et al. 2D numerical analysis of rock damage induced by dynamic in-situ stress redistribution and blast loading in underground blasting excavation[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 70: 221-232.
[5]Lu W, Ming C, Xiang G, et al. A study of excavation sequence and contour blasting method for underground powerhouses of hydropower stations[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology incorporating Trenchless Technology Research, 2012, 29: 31-39.
[6]肖正学, 张志呈, 李端明. 初始应力场对爆破效果的影响[J]. 煤炭学报, 1996, 21(5): 497-501. (Xiao Zhengxue, Zhang Zhicheng, Li Duanming. The influence of initial stress field on blasting[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 1996, 21(5): 497-501. (in Chinese))
[7]张惠聚. 考虑损伤的光面爆破成缝分析及爆破参数的数值分析研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉理工大学, 2005. (Zhang Huiju. Crack analysis of rock and numerical analysis on some parameters considering damage in smooth blasting[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2005. (in Chinese))
[8]付玉华, 李夕兵, 董陇军.损伤条件下深部岩体巷道光面爆破参数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(5): 1420-1426. (Fu Yuhua, Li Xibing, Dong Longjun. Analysis of smooth blasting parameters for tunnels in deep damaged rock mass[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(5): 1420-1426. (in Chinese))
[9]陈俊桦, 张家生, 李新平.考虑岩体完整程度的岩石爆破损伤模型及应用[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(5): 857-866. (Chen Junhua, Zhang Jiasheng, Li Xinping.Study of presplitting blasting parameters and its application based on rock blasting-induced damage theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 37(05): 857-866. (in Chinese))
[10]Banadaki M D. Stress-wave induced fracture in rock due to explosive action[D]. Toronto: University of Toronto, 2010.
[11]Xie L, Lu W, Zhang Q, et al. Analysis of damage mechanisms and optimization of cut blasting design under high in-situ stresses[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2017, 66: 19-33.
[12]Jayasinghe L B, Shang J, Zhao Z, et al. Numerical investigation into the blasting-induced damage characteristics of rocks considering the role of in-situ stresses and discontinuity persistence[J]. Comput Geotech, 2019, 116: 103207.
[13]吕亚峰.高密度聚乙烯管热熔焊接数值模拟研究[D].成都: 西南石油大学, 2017. (Lü Yafeng. Numerical simulation of hot melt welding of HDPE pipe[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2017. (in Chinese))
[14]王卫华, 张恒根, 李夕兵.爆破载荷下岩石的拉压损伤模型[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 52(11): 3918-3929. (Wang Weihua, Zhang Henggen, Li Xibing. Tension-compression damage model of rock under blasting load[J]. Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology Edition), 2021, 52(11): 3918-3929. (in Chinese))
[15]Zou B, Luo Z, Wang J, et al. Development and application of an intelligent evaluation and control platform for tunnel smooth blasting[J]. Geofluids, 2021, 2021.
[16]Heidbach O, Tingay M, Barth A, et al. Global crustal stress pattern based on the World Stress Map database release 2008[J]. Tectonophysics, 2010, 482(1-4): 3-15.
[17]Ma T, Li F, Yang Y, et al. Study on energy evolution and crack propagation of rock mass under single hole uncoupled charge blasting[J]. Applications in Engineering Science, 2022, 11: 100112.
[18]Huang J, Luo Y, Zhang G, et al. Numerical analysis on rock blasting damage in Xiluodu underground powerhouse using an improved constitutive model[J]. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2022, 26(7): 3009-3026.
