理论与试验研究

基于透明土试验隧道开挖诱发上覆管线变形研究

  • 郭炎伟 ,
  • 杨涛 ,
  • 杨明辉 ,
  • 宋牧原
展开
  • 1.河南省交通规划设计研究院股份有限公司, 郑州 450000;
    2.湖南大学 土木工程学院,长沙 410082;
    3.厦门大学 建筑与土木工程学院, 福建 厦门 361005
郭炎伟(1985—),男,河南许昌人,博士,高级工程师,主要从事隧道工程方面的研究。E-mail:25945800@qq.com
杨明辉(1978—),男,湖南武冈人,博士,教授,主要从事基础工程和地下空间建造方面的研究。E-mail:mhyang@xmu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2025-10-05

  网络出版日期: 2026-06-23

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(51278184);河南省重大科研专项(241111241000);河南省交通科技计划项目(2021J7)

Study on Overlying Pipelines Deformation Induced by Tunnel Excavation Based on Transparent Soil Test

  • Guo Yanwei ,
  • Yang Tao ,
  • Yang Minghui ,
  • Song Muyuan
Expand
  • 1. Henan Transportation Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 450000, P. R. China;
    2. School of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, P. R. China;
    3. School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361005, P. R. China

Received date: 2025-10-05

  Online published: 2026-06-23

摘要

在管隧间距较小的情况下隧道开挖对上覆管线的影响不可忽略。针对隧道开挖下穿既有管线这一特殊工况,采用透明土和PIV技术对连续与非连续管线的变形规律展开对比研究。通过对土体位移随隧道开挖的动态变化实施全程观测并采用控制变量法分析了抗弯刚度、管线埋深以及非连续管线的管节长度对管线变形的影响,结果表明:无论是连续管线还是非连续管线的沉降模式基本符合Gaussian沉降曲线;连续管线最大沉降值随着抗弯刚度的增大而逐渐减小且随着管线埋深的增大而逐渐增大;非连续管线的最大沉降值随着管节长度的增大而呈现先增大后减小的趋势;非连续管线与隧道的相对位置对其沉降有显著影响,当非连续管线接口在隧道轴线正上方时,其最大沉降值明显高于隧道轴线位于管节中心正下方的情况,表明隧道下穿位置接近非连续管线接口处为最危险情况,设计时应尽量避免。

本文引用格式

郭炎伟 , 杨涛 , 杨明辉 , 宋牧原 . 基于透明土试验隧道开挖诱发上覆管线变形研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2026 , 22(3) : 850 -859 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2026.03.10

Abstract

The influence of tunnel excavation on the overlying pipeline cannot be ignored when the distance between the pipeline and tunnel is minor. For the special condition of tunnel excavation through the existing pipeline, the transparent soil and PIV technologies were adopted to conduct a comparative study on the deformation regularities of continuous and non-continuous pipelines. The dynamic change of soil displacement with tunnel excavation was monitored, and the influence of bending stiffness, depth and section length of pipelines on their deformation was analyzed by the control variable method. The results show that: The settlement patterns of both continuous and non-continuous pipelines are basically consistent with the Gaussian settlement curve. The maximum settlement value of continuous pipeline decreases with the increase of flexural stiffness and increases with the increase of pipeline burial depth. The maximum settlement value of discontinuous pipeline increases first and then decreases with the increase of pipeline section length. In addition, the relative position between the non-continuous pipeline and tunnel has a significant impact on the pipeline settlement. When the non-continuous pipeline interface is directly above the tunnel axis, its maximum settlement value is significantly higher than those value when the tunnel axis is directly below the pipeline joint center, indicating that the tunnel crossing position close to the non-continuous pipeline interface is the most dangerous situation which should be avoided as soon as possible in design.

参考文献

[1] Attewell P B, Yeates J, Selby A R. Soil movements induced by tunnelling and their effects on pipelines and structures[M]. London: Blackie & Son, 1986.
[2] Wang Y, Wang Q, Zhang K Y. An analytical model for pipe-soil-tunneling interaction[J].Procedia Engineering, 2011, 14: 3127-3135.
[3] Klar A, Vorster T E B, Soga K, et al. Soil-pipe interaction due to tunnelling: comparison between Winkler and elastic continuum solutions[J]. Géotechnique, 2005, 55(6): 461-466.
[4] Klar A, Marshall A M. Linear elastic tunnel pipeline interaction: the existence and consequence of volume loss equality[J]. Géotechnique, 2015, 65(9): 788-792.
[5] Vorster T E B,Klar A, Soga K, et al. Estimating the effects of tunneling on existing pipelines[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131(11): 1399-1410.
[6] Shi X,Rong C X, Cheng H, et al. An energy solution for predicting buried pipeline response induced by tunneling based on a uniform ground movement model[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020(1): 1-12.
[7] Klar A, Marshall A M, Soga K, et al. Tunneling effects on jointed pipelines[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2008, 45(1): 131-139.
[8] 韩煊, 雷崇红, 张鹏. 隧道开挖引起管线沉降计算的刚度修正法[J]. 土木建筑与环境工程, 2012, 34(3): 21-27. (Han Xuan, Lei Chonghong, Zhang Peng. A Modified Stiffness Approach to Predict Tunnelling Induced Deformation and Force of Pipelines[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2012, 34(3): 21-27. (in Chinese))
[9] 朱叶艇, 张桓, 张子新, 等. 盾构隧道推进对邻近地下管线影响的物理模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2016(增2): 151-160. (Zhu Yeting, Zhang Huan, Zhang Zixin, et al. Physical model test study of influence of advance of shield tunnel on adjacent underground pipelines[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(Supp.2): 151-160. (in Chinese))
[10] 张家文, 邢文豪, 蒋仕清, 等. 浅埋隧道施工对上覆地层变形影响的试验研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2022, 18(4): 1233-1240. (Zhang Jiawen, Xing Wenhao, Jiang Shiqing, et al. Experimental Study on the Effect of Shallow Tunnel Construction on Deformation of Overlying Strata[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2022, 18(4): 1233-1240. (in Chinese))
[11] Vorster T E B. The effect oftunnelling on buried pipes[D]. London: Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 2006.
[12] Shi J W, Wang Y, Ng C W W. Three-dimensional centrifuge modeling of ground and pipeline response to tunnel excavation[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2016, 142(11): 04016054.
[13] Hsu J H,Shou K J. Experimental study of the separated joint of an underground pipeline rehabilitated by cured-in-place pipe[J]. Underground Space, 2022, 7(4): 543-563.
[14] 魏纲, 王辰, 丁智, 等. 邻近管线的类矩形盾构隧道施工室内模型试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(增2): 3905-3912. (Wei Gang, Wang Chen, Ding Zhi, et al. Study on indoor model test of similar quasi-rectangular shield tunnel adjacent to pipeline[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(Supp.2): 3905-3912. (in Chinese))
[15] Wang Y, Shi J W, Ng C W W. Numerical modeling of tunneling effect on buried pipelines[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2011, 48(7): 1125-1137.
[16] Xu M, Shi L F. A numerical study on the effect of tunneling on adjacent buried pipelines[A]//International Conference on Pipelines and Trenchless Technology 2011: Sustainable Solutions for Water, Sewer, Gas, and Oil Pipelines[C], 2011: 1376-1387.
[17] Shou K J, Huang C C. Numerical analysis of straight and curved underground pipeline performance after rehabilitation by cured-in-place method[J]. Underground Space, 2020, 5(1): 30-42.
[18] 史江伟,王金朴.盾构开挖面失稳下既有管线三维变形特性研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2025,21(3):1057-1065. (Shi Jiangwei,Wang Jinpu.Investigation of three-dimensional deformation characteristics of existing pipelines due to tunnel face instability[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2025,21(3):1057-1065. (in Chinese))
[19] 沈俊,晏莉,傅金阳,等.叠线盾构隧道并行下穿燃气管线影响分析[J].地下空间与工程学报,2021,17(增1):449-456. (Shen Jun,Yan Li,Fu Jinyang, et al.Influence analysis of parallel underpass gas pipeline of overlapped shield tunnel[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2021,17(Supp.1):449-456. (in Chinese))
[20] Ezzein F M, Bathurst R J. A transparent sand for geotechnical laboratory modeling[J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2011, 34(6): 590-601.
[21] Zhang Z,Xu Q, Chen J F, et al. Geotechnical properties of a transparent glass sand saturated with a blend of mineral oils[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2017, 10(24).
[22] Peck R B. Deep excavations andtunnelling in soft ground[A]//Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on SMFE[C]. Mexico City, 1969: 225-290.
文章导航

/