理论与试验研究

考虑复合滑移面与各向异性渗流的被动土压力计算

  • 张建 ,
  • 卫俊杰 ,
  • 胡正
展开
  • 1.珠海市规划设计研究院,广东 珠海 519000;
    2.广东省滨海地区防灾减灾工程技术研究中心,广东 珠海 519000;
    3.中山大学 土木工程学院,广东 珠海 519082;
    4.隧道工程灾变防控与智能建养全国重点实验室,广东 珠海 519082
张建(1983—),男,湖南株洲人,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事城市防洪(潮)、河道整治等方面的设计及研究工作。E-mail:121939233@qq.com
胡正(1991—),男,江苏徐州人,博士,副教授,主要从事计算岩土力学、水工岩土工程等方面的研究工作。 E-mail:huzheng6@mail.sysu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2025-03-10

  网络出版日期: 2026-03-03

基金资助

广东省自然科学基金(2025A1515010205);国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFB2604200);国家自然科学基金(52478381)

Passive Earth Pressure Calculation Considering Composite Failure Surface and Anisotropic Seepage

  • Zhang Jian ,
  • Wei Junjie ,
  • Hu Zheng
Expand
  • 1. Zhuhai Institute of Urban Planning and Design,Zhuhai, Guangdong 519000, P.R. China;
    2. Guangdong Coastal Area Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Research Center, Zhuhai, Guangdong 519000, P.R. China;
    3. School of Civil Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai,Guangdong 519082, P.R.China;
    4. State Key Laboratory for Tunnel Engineering, Zhuhai, Guangdong, P.R. 519082, China

Received date: 2025-03-10

  Online published: 2026-03-03

摘要

受暴雨与城市内涝等极端环境影响,挡土结构后覆土极易产生渗流,进而显著降低挡土结构的被动土压力,降低其整体稳定性。为研究渗流影响下的土压力,本文提出一种考虑各向异性渗流效应的挡土结构被动土压力的修正计算方法。采用较通用的双曲螺旋线与直线组合的复合滑移面,首先求解修正Kötter方程以获得滑移面的有效土体反力分布,同时利用二维Laplace方程计算墙后覆土内的孔隙水压力,再通过迭代试错法计算挡土结构被动土压力系数。本方法通过力矩平衡获得被动土压力的作用位置,能够分析影响被动土压力大小及分布的主控因素。结果表明,渗流各向异性程度对被动土压力的大小和分布有显著影响,被动土压力随各向异性系数的增大而减小,最大降幅可达20%,土体有效内摩擦角的增大和各向异性系数的减小均会引起被动土压力合力作用位置降低,其作用位置会在墙高2/5~1/10范围内波动。

本文引用格式

张建 , 卫俊杰 , 胡正 . 考虑复合滑移面与各向异性渗流的被动土压力计算[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2026 , 22(1) : 72 -81 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2026.01.08

Abstract

Extreme environmental conditions, such as heavy rainstorms and urban waterlogging, can cause seepage within backfill, significantly reducing the passive earth pressure on retaining structures and compromising their stability. To study the earth pressure under the influence of seepage, a modified calculation method of the passive earth pressure of retaining structure considering the anisotropic seepage effect is proposed in this paper. The effective soil reaction distribution on the sliding surface was obtained by solving the modified Kötter equation, and the pore water pressure in the soil behind the wall was calculated by using the two-dimensional Laplace equation. Then the passive soil pressure coefficient of the retaining structure was calculated by an iterative trial and error method. This method obtains the position of passive earth pressure through moment balance, and can analyze the main controlling factors affecting the magnitude and distribution of passive earth pressure. The results show that the degree of seepage anisotropy has a significant effect on the magnitude and distribution of passive earth pressure. The passive earth pressure decreases with the increase of the anisotropy coefficient, and the maximum decrease can reach 20%. The increase of the effective internal friction angle and the decrease of the anisotropy coefficient will cause the decrease of the combined action position of passive earth pressure. Its action position will fluctuate within the range of 2/5 to 1/10 of the wall height.

参考文献

[1] Coulomb C A. Essai sur une application des règles des maximis et minimis à quelques problèmes de statique relatifs à l'architecture[J]. Mémoires de mathématiques et de physique présentés à l'académie Royale des Sciences, Paris, 1776, 7: 343-382.
[2] Rankine W J M. On the stability of loose earth[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1857, 147(1187): 9-27.
[3] 巨永前,夏琼. 竖向分层非饱和土主动土压力的计算与分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2022, 18(1): 75-82. (Ju Yongqian, Xia Qiong. Calculation and Analysis of Active Earth Pressure for Vertical Stratified Unsaturated Soil [J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2022, 18(1): 75-82. (in Chinese))
[4] Liu J, Li X. Upper-bound limit analysis on seismic rotational stability of waterfront retaining walls[J]. Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 2022, 40(5): 554-562.
[5] 杨宇哲,吴文兵,倪芃芃,等. RB模式下挡土墙地震非极限被动土压力计算[J].工程力学: 2025, 42(7): 129-136. (Yang Yuzhe, Wu Wenbing, Ni Pengpeng, et al. Pseudo-dynamic analysis of seismic non-limit passive earth pressure under the RB mode[J]. Engineering Mechanics: 2025, 42(7): 129-136. (in Chinese))
[6] 张泰丽,周爱国, 孙强,等. 台风暴雨条件下滑坡地下水渗流特征及成因机制[J]. 地球科学, 2017, 42(12): 2354-2362. (Zhang Taili, Zhou Aiguo, Sun Qiang, et al. Characteristics of the groundwater seepage and failure mechanisms of landslide induced by typhoon rainstorm[J]. Earth Science, 2017, 42(12): 2354-2362. (in Chinese))
[7] 李铎,刘洋,方晓峰. 唐山沿海地区地面沉降渗流固结耦合模拟研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2015, 23(1): 105-110. (Li Duo, Liu Yang, Fang Xiaofeng. Simulation of land subsidence in coastal areas of Tangshan with a seepage-consolidation coupling model[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2015, 23(1): 105-110. (in Chinese))
[8] Barros P L A, Santos P J. Coefficients of active earth pressure with seepage effect[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2012, 49(6): 651-658.
[9] 吴博,赵坤朋,黄岳文, 等. 水位骤降条件下强透水基础岸墙填土渗流分析[J]. 河海大学学报(自然科学版),2021,49(1):93-98.(Wu Bo, Zhao Kunpeng, Huang Yuewen, et al. Seepage analysis in backfill behind quay wall on highly permeable foundation soil under rapid drawdown of water level[J]. Journal of Hohai University(Natural Sciences), 2021,49(1):93-98. (in Chinese))
[10] Ai Z Y, Wu C. Plane strain consolidation of soil layer with anisotropic permeability[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2009, 30(11): 1437-1444.
[11] Ganesh R, Khuntia S, Sahoo J P. Active thrust of sand with anisotropic seepage: A generalised limit equilibrium approach[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 175(5): 495-506.
[12] Hu Z, Yang Z X, Wilkinson S. P. Analysis of passive earth pressure modification due to seepage flow effects[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2018, 55(5): 666-679.
[13] 赖丰文,刘松玉,杨大禹,等.有限宽度填土挡墙主动土压力的普适解法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2022, 44(3): 483-491. (Lai Fengwen, Liu Songyu, Yang Dayu, et al. Generalized solution to active earth pressure exerted onto retaining wall with narrow backfills[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(3): 483-491. (in Chinese))
[14] 张振波,黄安,周佳迪,等. 基坑近接地铁车站主动土压力合力算法研究[J].岩土工程学报,2024, 46(7): 1516-1524. (Zhang Zhenbo, Huang An, Zhou Jiadi, et al. Active soil pressure resultant force algorithm of foundation pit adjacent to underground subway station[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2024, 46(7): 1516-1524. (in Chinese))
[15] 王崇宇,刘晓平,曹周红,等. 有限宽度土体被动土压力及滑裂面试验研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2022, 18(4): 1250-1258, 1265. (Wang Chongyu, Liu Xiaoping, Cao Zhouhong, et al. Experimental Study on Passive Earth Pressure and Slip Surface of Limited Width Soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering 2022, 18(4): 1250-1258, 1265. (in Chinese))
[16] 史克宝,卢坤林,陈一鸣,等. 绕顶转动模式下三维被动土压力的数值研究[J]. 工程地质学报, 2020, 28(3): 459-470. (Wang Chongyu, Liu Xiaoping, Cao Zhouhong, et al. Numerical Study of 3D Passive Earth Pressure during Wall Rotation around the Top Mode [J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2020, 28(3): 459-470. (in Chinese))
[17] Patki M A, Mandal J N, Dewaikar D M. Determination of passive earth pressure coefficients using limit equilibrium approach coupled with the Kötter equation[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2015, 52(9): 1241-1254.
[18] Mohapatra B G. Some studies on bearing capacity of shallow foundations[D]. Bombay, India: Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, 2001.
[19] Kötter F. Die bestimmung des Druckes an gekrummten Gleitflachen, eine Aufgabe aus der Lehre Vom Ediddruck.[J]. Berlin: Sitzungsberichteder Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1903 (1903): 229-233.
[20] Carrillo N. Differential equation of a sliding surface in an ideal saturated plastic soil[J]. Journal of Mathematics and Physics, 1942, 21(1-4): 6-9.
[21] Patki M A, Dewaikar D M, Mandal J N. Numerical Study on Passive Earth Pressures Using Kötter's Equation[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 17(2): 06016015.
[22] Soubra A.H., Macuh B. Active and passive earth pressure coefficients by a kinematical approach[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 155(2): 119-131.
[23] Shiau J S, Augarde C E, Lyamin A V, et al. Finite element limit analysis of passive earth resistance in cohesionless soils[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2008, 48(6): 843-850.
[24] Antão A N, Santana T G, Vicente da Silva M, et al. Passive earth-pressure coefficients by upper-bound numerical limit analysis[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2011, 48(5): 767-780.
文章导航

/