地下空间开发利用

多元主体协同下的地下公共空间营造研究

  • 吴珊珊 ,
  • 白韵溪
展开
  • 1.苏州科技大学 建筑与城市规划学院,江苏 苏州 215009;
    2.哈尔滨工业大学(深圳) 建筑学院,广东 深圳 518055
吴珊珊(1986—),女,浙江湖州人,博士,副教授,主要从事轨道交通站域空间、城市公共空间、城市设计的教学与科研工作。E-mail:wushanshan@usts.edu.cn
白韵溪(1988—),女,天津人,博士,助理教授,主要从事城市更新与设计等领域的研究工作。 E-mail:baiyunxi@hit.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2025-12-06

  网络出版日期: 2026-03-03

基金资助

国家自然科学基金青年项目(52108023,52008130)

Placemaking of Underground Public Space under the Cooperation of Multiple Subjects

  • Wu Shanshan ,
  • Bai Yunxi
Expand
  • 1. School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215009, P.R. China;
    2. School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, P.R. China

Received date: 2025-12-06

  Online published: 2026-03-03

摘要

地下公共空间是存量发展理念下具有开发潜力的国土空间资源储备,也是城市公共空间系统的重要组成部分。与地上公共空间相比,地下公共空间涉及的开发主体较多,难以有效协同而形成高品质的公共空间系统。弹性奖励制度、多元主体协商议事平台等多元主体协同机制能够动员政府、开发主体、使用者以及第三方参与公共空间营造,能够解决地下公共空间开发面临的问题。以札幌駅前通地下步行空间营造为例,阐述以地下步行空间为核心的公共空间系统建设和运营历程,分析地下公共空间规划、建设、运营全周期内多元主体的协同机制和协同模式。结果表明,札幌案例具有整合多元主体协同目标、量化地下公共空间弹性奖励措施和以组织为媒介构建多元主体协同网络等优势,可为我国地下公共空间开发提供参考。

本文引用格式

吴珊珊 , 白韵溪 . 多元主体协同下的地下公共空间营造研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2026 , 22(1) : 19 -28 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2026.01.03

Abstract

Underground public space is a reserve of national spatial resources with development potential under the concept of stock development, and it is also an important component of the urban public space system. However, compared with above ground public space, underground public space involves more development entities, making it difficult to effectively coordinate and form a high-quality public space system. The flexible reward system, multi-party negotiation and discussion platform, and other multi-party collaborative mechanisms can mobilize the government, development entities, users, and third parties to participate in the creation of public spaces, and can solve the problems faced by underground public space development. This study utilizes case study method to thoroughly explore the construction and operation process of a public space system centered on underground pedestrian spaces in Sapporo. The study analyzes the collaborative mechanisms and models of multiple entities throughout the entire cycle of underground public space planning, construction and operation, which focus on the collaboration between government, local developers, the third organizations and citizens. The results show that: The Sapporo case has the advantages of integrating multi-agent coordination goal, quantifying elastic incentive measures of underground public space and constructing multi-agent coordination network with organization as media, which can provide reference for the development of underground public space in China.

参考文献

[1] 李满海,李盈璇,张咏颖.城市地下空间的设计转向研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2023,19(1):13-21. (Li Manhai, Li Yingxuan, Zhang Yongying. The Turn of Urban Underground Space Design [J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2023, 19(1): 13-21. (in Chinese))
[2] 栗佳玮,沈中伟.国外地下步行空间开发对我国城市建设的启示[J].地下空间与工程学报,2023,19(增1):1-7. (Li Jiawei, Shen Zhongwei. Enlightenment of Foreign Underground Pedestrian Space Development on urban Construction in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2023, 19(Supp.1): 1-7. (in Chinese))
[3] 顾宗超,刘睿哲,陆伟.日本轨交站域地下步行系统发展类型动因研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2023,19(4):1058-1066. (Gu Zongchao, Liu Ruizhe, Lu Wei. Research on the Development Type and Motivation of Underground Pedestrian System in the Rail Transit Station Area of Japan [J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2023, 19(4): 1058-1066. (in Chinese))
[4] 曾国华,汤志立.城市地下空间一体化发展的内涵、路径及建议[J].地下空间与工程学报,2022,18(3):701-713, 778. (Zeng Guohua, Tang Lizhi. Connotation, Path and Suggestion of Integrated Development of Urban Underground Space [J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering. 2022, 18(3): 701-713, 778. (in Chinese))
[5] 汤玉箫,何磊,王睿华,等.南京市地下商业空间布局特征及影响因素分析[J].地下空间与工程学报,2023,19(2):368-379. (Tang Yuxiao, He Lei, Wang Ruihua, et al. Spatial Distribution Pattern and Influence Factors of Underground Commerce in Nanjing [J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2023, 19(2): 368-379. (in Chinese))
[6] 方翰,沈中伟,喻冰洁,等.基于POI的成都市地下商业空间演化与机制研究--以火车北站、春熙路、环球中心片区为例[J].南方建筑,2022(1):85-93. (Fang Han, Shen Zhongwei, Yu Bingiie, et al. Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Underground Commercial Space in Chengdu Based on POI Data: A case study based on North Railway Station Area, Chunxi Road Area and Global Center Area [J]. South Architecture, 2022 (1): 85-93. (in Chinese))
[7] 乔永康,彭芳乐.城市地下空间三维地籍研究进展及建设思考[J].地下空间与工程学报,2023,19(2):359-367, 409. (Qiao Yongkang, Peng Fangle. Advances and Development Thoughts on Three-Dimensional Urban Underground Cadastre [J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2023, 19(2): 359-367, 409. (in Chinese))
[8] 赵怡婷,吴克捷,石晓冬.国土空间规划体系下的地下空间规划管控方法探索[J].隧道建设(中英文),2022.42(2):313.(Zhao Yiting, Wu Kejie, Shi Xiaodong. Underground Space Planning Control Methods under Territorial Space Planning System: A Case Study of Beijing Sub-city Center Project [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2022, 42(2): 313. (in Chinese))
[9] 赵阳,李蓓蓓,顾新,等.深圳城市地下空间发展历程、现状与未来构想[J].隧道建设(中英文),2024,44(3):433-441.(Zhao Yang, Li Beibei, Gu Xin, et al. Development History, Present Situation, and Future Conception of Urban Underground Space in Shenzhen, China[J]. Tunnel Constrction,2024, 44(3): 433-441. (in Chinese))
[10] 梁晨,卓健.聚焦公共要素的上海城市更新问题、难点及政策探讨[J].城市规划学刊,2019(增1):142-149. (Liang Chen, Zhuo Jian. The Problems, Challenges and Policy Reponses in Shanghai's Urban Regeneration with a focusing on Public Elements [J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2019 (Supp.1): 142-149. (in Chinese))
[11] 王嘉,白韵溪,宋聚生.我国城市更新演进历程、挑战与建议[J].规划师,2021,37(24):21-27. (Wang Jia, Bai Yunxi, Song Jusheng. The Evolution, Challenges and Suggestions of Urban Renewal in China [J]. Planners. 2021, 37(24): 21-27. (in Chinese))
[12] 王承旭,钱征寒.融合治理理念的深圳城市更新实践[J].城市发展研究,2021,28(10):8-11. (Wang Chengxu, Qian Zhenghan. Shenzhen Urban Renewal Practice Integrated with the Concept of Governance [J]. Urban Development Studies, 2021, 28(10): 8-11. (in Chinese))
[13] 刘悦来,寇怀云.上海社区花园参与式空间微更新微治理策略探索.中国园林,2019,35(12):5-11. (Liu Yuelai, Kou Huaiyun. Study on the Strategy of Micro-renewal and Micro-governance by Public Participatory of Shanghai Community Garden [J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2019, 35(12): 5-11. (in Chinese))
[14] 刘悦来,尹科娈,孙哲,等.共治的景观——上海社区花园公共空间更新与社会治理融合实验[J].建筑学报,2022(3):12-19. (Liu Yuelai, Yin Keluan, Sun Zhe, et al. Cooperative Landscape A Case Study of the Experiment of Integrating Public Space Renewal and social Governance of community Gardens in Shanghai [J]. Architectural Journal, 2022(3): 12-19. (in Chinese))
[15] 伍炜,蔡天抒.城市更新中如何落实公共开放空间奖励——以深圳市南湖街道食品大厦城市更新单元规划实践为例[J].城市规划,2017,41(10):114-118. (Wu Wei, Cai Tianshu. How to Carry out Public Open Space Rewards in Urban Renewal: A Case Sstudy of Urban Renewal Unit Planning of Food Building in Nanhu Street, Shenzhen City [J]. Urban Planning, 2017, 41(10): 114-118. (in Chinese))
[16] 西淳二, 金田一淳司. 札幌駅地下歩行空間に係わる市民合意形成の経緯と展望[J]. 土木計画学研究·講演集, 2002 (29):1-4. ( Junji Nishi, Atsushi Kintaichi. A study on the formation of citizens' consensus in the underground pedestrian space of Sapporo Station [J]. Journal of Civil Engineering Research, 2002 (29): 1-4. (in Japanese))
[17] 星卓志. 札幌都心部における公民連携による公共空間ネットワーク形成[J]. 日本建築学会技術報告集, 2022, 28(68): 424-429. (Hoshi Takashi. Public space network formation by public private cooperation in the central area of Sapporo [J]. Architectural Institute of Japan, 2022, 28(68): 424-429. (in Japanese))
[18] 马晨骁,董蕴豪,彭芳乐.站域地下公共空间的发展规律研究:以上海为例[J].地质与勘探,2024,60(1):9-19. (Ma Chenxiao, Dong Yunhao, Peng Fangle. Development Rules of Metro-led Underground Public Space: A Case Study of Shanghai City[J].Geology and Exploration, 2024, 60(1): 9-19. (in Chinese))
[19] 王磊,卓蕾,阮晶晶.高品质地下公共空间精细化管控策略[J].规划师,2024, 40(3):137-142. (Wang Lei, Zhuo Lei, Ruan Jingjing. Refined Governance of High Quality Underground Public Space [J]. Planners, 2024, 40(3): 137-142. (in Chinese))
[20] 陈亚斌.高密度城市容积率奖励机制对公共空间形成作用的研究:纽约和东京的比较[J].景观设计,2019(4):22-29. (Chen Yabin. The Effect of FAR Awards Mechanism on the Formation of Public Space in High-density Cities: the Comparison of the New York City and Tokyo [J]. Landscape Design, 2019(4): 22-29. (in Chinese))
[21] 言语,徐磊青,刘珩,等.轨交综合体基面公共空间的容积率奖励条件研究基于公共空间品质与可达性验证[J].时代建筑,2023(2):44-53. (Yan Yu, Xu Leiqing, Liu Heng, et al. Precondition of Railway Complex's Urban Base Public Spaces as Incentive Zoning Sending Area Empirical Study on Public Space Quality and Accessibility [J]. Time + Architecture, 2023(2): 44-53. (in Chinese))
[22] 赵楠楠,刘玉亭,王世福.社会影响评估视角下我国历史街区更新的现实困境与治理优化——以广州恩宁路为例[J].现代城市研究,2023(8):1-7. (Zhao Nannan, Liu Yuting, Wang Shifu. Social Impact Assessment in Addressing the Dilemma of Urban Regeneration: A Case Study of Enning Road in Guangzhou [J]. Modern Urban Research, 2023(8): 1-7. (in Chinese))
文章导航

/