防灾与环境

高地应力碳质板岩隧道大变形处治技术研究

  • 彭涛 ,
  • 李佳龙 ,
  • 何蕃民 ,
  • 严涛 ,
  • 王维嘉
展开
  • 1.中冶成都勘察研究总院有限公司,成都 610023;
    2.西南交通大学 土木工程学院,成都 610031;
    3.交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室 (西南交通大学),成都 610031;
    4.四川交投设计咨询研究院有限责任公司,成都 610041
彭涛(1981—),男,四川简阳人,正高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程科研和勘察设计工作。E-mail:ptgeo@foxmail.com
严涛(1982—),男,四川简阳人,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事隧道科研工作。E-mail:yantao228@163.com

收稿日期: 2025-03-20

  网络出版日期: 2026-01-26

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(51508475);中国中冶2022年非钢领域立项重大研发项目(中冶科技〔2022〕2号)

Research on Large Deformation Treatment Technology of High-Stress Carbonaceous Slate Rock Tunnels

  • Peng Tao ,
  • Li Jialong ,
  • He Fanmin ,
  • Yan Tao ,
  • Wang Weijia
Expand
  • 1. Chengdu Surveying Geotechnical Research Institute Co., Ltd. of MCC, Chengdu 610023, P. R. China;
    2. School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, P. R. China;
    3. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, P. R. China;
    4. Sichuan Jiaotou Design Consulting Research Institute Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610041, P. R. China

Received date: 2025-03-20

  Online published: 2026-01-26

摘要

高地应力软岩隧道大变形已经成为制约工程进度以及增加工程成本的关键问题。依托某高原高地应力碳质板岩软岩隧道,对其大变形作用机理、岩体力学参数以及大变形处治技术进行了研究,结果表明:(1)软岩隧道围岩大变形主要跟弹性模量、泊松比、开挖半径以及地应力水平有关,除上述因素外,塑性区半径还跟岩体的黏聚力、内摩擦角以及支护阻力相关;(2)开展室内单轴以及三轴试验,确定了依托工程岩体弹性模量平均值为9.003 GPa,泊松比为0.246,内摩擦角为36.09°,黏聚力为4.79 MPa;(3)根据工程类比给出了依托工程隧道大变形采用“初支早封闭,预应力长锚索+双层初支放抗结合的主被动控制”的处治方法;(4)原设计施工最大累积水平收敛值达到 72 cm,拱顶下沉累积量达到38 cm,采用变更处治方法后试验段测试数据表明其变形量控制在水平收敛为11 cm,拱顶下沉值仅3.5 cm,达到了控制大变形且使隧道进尺稳步推进的目的。研究成果可为类似岩性隧道大变形控制提供借鉴。

本文引用格式

彭涛 , 李佳龙 , 何蕃民 , 严涛 , 王维嘉 . 高地应力碳质板岩隧道大变形处治技术研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2025 , 21(S2) : 940 -948 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.S2.48

Abstract

The problem of large deformation in high-stress soft rock tunnels has become the key to constraining the project's progress and increasing the cost. Based on a plateau high-stress carbonaceous slate soft rock tunnel, the mechanism of large deformation, rock mechanical parameters, and large deformation treatment technology were studied in this paper. The results show that: (1) The large deformation of soft rock tunnel peripheral rock is mainly related to the modulus of elasticity, Poisson's ratio, excavation radius, and the level of ground stress; the radius of the plastic zone in addition to the above factors is also related to the cohesion of the rock body, the angle of internal friction, and the resistance of support. (2) Through indoor uniaxial and triaxial tests, the average value of elastic modulus of the rock body of the dependent project was determined to be 9.003 GPa, Poisson's ratio to be 0.246, the angle of internal friction to be 36.09°, and the cohesion to be 4.79 MPa and the above values were taken as the input parameter values for numerical calculations. (3) According to the engineering analogy, the design change treatment method of “early closure of the initial support, prestressed long anchor cable + double-layer initial support release resistance combination of active and passive control” is given for the large tunnel deformation of the dependent project. (4) According to the original design, the maximum cumulative horizontal convergence value reached 72 cm, and the cumulative amount of vault subsidence reached 38 cm. The test data of the test section after adopting the change of treatment method showed that the deformation was controlled at the level of convergence of 11 cm, and the value of vault subsidence was only 3.5 cm, which achieved the purpose of controlling the large deformation and making the tunnel progress steadily. The research results can provide a reference for the control of large deformation in tunnels with similar lithology.

参考文献

[1] 何满潮,景海河,孙晓明.软岩工程力学[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.
[2] 李志军,郭新新,马振旺,等.挤压大变形隧道研究现状及高强预应力一次(型)支护体系[J].隧道建设(中英文),2020,40(6):755-782.
[3] 王小林,黄彦波.中外高地应力软岩隧道大变形工程技术措施对比分析——以兰渝铁路木寨岭隧道与瑞士圣哥达基线隧道为例[J].隧道建设(中英文),2018,38(10):1621-1629.
[4] 韩常领,夏才初,徐晨.软岩隧道挤压性大变形控制技术研究进展[J].地下空间与工程学报,2020,16(增1):492-505.
[5] 何满潮,郭志飚.恒阻大变形锚杆力学特性及其工程应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(7):1297-1308.
[6] 汪波,王杰,吴德兴,等.让压支护体系在软岩大变形公路隧道中的应用研究[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2016,13(10):1985-1993.
[7] 李国良,刘志春,朱永全.兰渝铁路高地应力软岩隧道挤压大变形规律及分级标准研究[J].现代隧道技术,2015,52(1):62-68.
[8] 朱永全,孙明磊,李文江.高地应力软岩大变形隧道稳定性判据研究[J].高速铁路技术,2020,11(2):54-58.
[9] 陈子全.高地应力层状软岩隧道围岩变形机理与支护结构体系力学行为研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2015.
[10] 韩常领,姚铁峰,徐英俊,等.高地应力隧道软岩大变形控制现场试验研究[J].西部交通科技,2020(11):129-132.
[11] 唐绍武,王庆林.木寨岭隧道大战沟斜井高地应力软岩大变形施工技术[J].隧道建设,2010,30(2):199-201,211.
[12] 谭忠盛,杨旸,陈伟,等.中老铁路高地应力软岩隧道大变形控制技术研究[J].铁道学报,2020,42(12):171-178.
[13] 刘国庆.木寨岭隧道软岩大变形段支护措施研究[J].现代隧道技术,2011,53(6):135-141,147.
[14] 沈明荣,陈建峰编著.岩体力学[M].上海:同济大学出版社,2015.
[15] 朱永全,宋玉香主编.隧道工程[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,2015.
[16] 吕显福,赵占群,魏星星.高地应力软岩隧道大变形机理及控制措施探讨[J].现代隧道技术,2016,48(4):227-231.
[17] 汪波,郭新新,何川,等.当前我国高地应力隧道支护技术特点及发展趋势浅析[J].现代隧道技术,2018,55(5):1-10.
[18] 魏来,刘钦,黄沛.高地应力软岩隧道大变形机理及控制对策研究综述[J].公路,2017,62(7):297-306.
[19] 邓鹏海,刘泉声.高应力软岩隧道破裂碎胀米级大变形机理研究[J].中国公路学报,2023,36(8):225-239.
[20] 李廷春.毛羽山隧道高地应力软岩大变形施工控制技术[J].现代隧道技术,2011,48(2):59-67.
[21] 马殷军.新乌鞘岭隧道岭脊段高地应力软岩大变形控制技术[J].中国铁路,2023,(11):1-7.
[22] 陈善民,王全胜,辛维克,等.新乌鞘岭隧道软岩大变形悬臂掘进机施工控制技术研究[J].隧道建设(中英文),2022,42(4):720-729.
[23] 宋嘉辉.高地应力千枚岩地层隧道大变形控制措施探讨[J].施工技术,2012,41(7):90-92.
[24] 邹翀,张民庆,李沿宗,等.高地应力软岩隧道施工变形控制方法试验研究[J].隧道建设,2012,32(1):5-10.
[25] 李国良,李宁,丁彦杰.高地应力软岩大变形隧道防控关键技术研究[J].中国铁路,2020,(12):69-73.
[26] 李赛.高地应力软岩隧道变形特征研究[D].石家庄:石家庄铁道大学,2022.
[27] 田四明,王伟,唐国荣,等.川藏铁路隧道工程重大不良地质应对方案探讨[J].隧道建设(中英文),2021,41(5):697-712.
文章导航

/