依托北京南水北调工程团九二期泥水盾构隧道工程,针对北京西山东侧山前斜坡带典型地质特征,将地层分为砂卵石地层Ⅰ、砂卵石夹黏土地层、砂卵石地层Ⅱ、断层破碎带、全断面硬岩和含砾黏土6种地层,统计了区间1 409环的总推力、刀盘扭矩、推进速度、刀盘转速、贯入度、上切口压力6个核心参数的中位数,分布特征和地层的区分度。结果表明:不同地层掘进速度上区分度较好,总推力的区分度较低,散体地层扭矩高于连续体地层;稳定性好的地层刀盘转速大于稳定性差的地层,提高约25%;含砾黏土层和全断面硬岩地层的贯入度较小,低于6 mm;稳定性好的地层在同埋深地层中切口压力小;贯入度符合正态分布程度总体较好,总推力符合程度一般,其他参数较差;将盾构推力和扭矩进行标准化处理,砂卵石地层的推力值和扭矩值分布区间范围最为集中,含砾黏土次之;全断面硬岩的推力值和砂卵石夹黏土地层的扭矩值分散;标准化处理后的推力和扭矩线性拟合系数R2均大于0.89,不同地层的斜率值在1.87×10-2~5.47×10-2之间,数值在同一数量级且有明显的区分度。
Based on the slurry shield tunnel project of the Phase II Tuancheng Lake-Jiuxianqiao Project in Beijing's South-to-North Water Diversion, and targeting the typical geological characteristics of the piedmont slope zone on the east side of the Western Hills of Beijing, the strata were divided into six types: gravel-cobble stratum I, gravel-cobble stratum with clay interbeds, gravel-cobble stratum II, fault fracture zone, full-face hard rock, and clay with gravel. Statistical analysis was conducted on the median values, distribution characteristics, and stratigraphic differentiation of six key parameters (total thrust, cutterhead torque, advance rate, cutterhead rotation speed, penetration per revolution, and chamber pressure) from 1409 tunnel rings. The results indicate that: The advance rate shows good stratigraphic differentiation while the total thrust exhibits poor differentiation, and the torque of discrete strata is higher than that of continuous strata; The cutterhead rotation speed in strata with good stability is approximately 25% higher than that in strata with poor stability; The penetration per revolution in clay with gravel and Full-face hard rock strata is relatively small, below 6 mm; Strata with good stability have lower chamber pressure under the same burial depth; The penetration per revolution shows generally good compliance with the normal distribution, the total thrust has moderate compliance, and other parameters perform poorly; After normalizing the shield thrust and torque parameters, the distribution ranges of thrust and torque values in gravel-cobble strata are the most concentrated, followed by clay with gravel; the thrust values of full-face hard rock and the torque values of gravel-cobble stratum with clay interbeds are dispersed; the linear fitting coefficients (R2) of the normalized thrust-torque relationships are all greater than 0.89 for different strata, and the slope values range from 1.87×10-2 to 5.47×10-2, which are of the same order of magnitude with obvious differentiation between different strata types.
[1] 何川,黄兴,陈凡,等.EPB/TBM双模盾构复合地层掘进参数及适应性研究[J].铁道工程学报,2023,40(3):96-103.
[2] 何川,陈凡,黄钟晖,等.复合地层双模盾构适应性及掘进参数研究[J].岩土工程学报,2021,43(1):43-52.
[3] 李锟,田管凤,马宏伟,等.土压平衡盾构掘进参数相关性分析及预测模型[J].科学技术与工程,2021,21(9):3814-3821.
[4] 杨果林,张沛然,陈亚军,等.长沙典型地层土压平衡盾构掘进参数及表现预测[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2020,51(8):2069-2080.
[5] 徐汪豪,倪婉昱,赵海涛,等.清华园盾构隧道复杂互层地层下的掘进参数研究[J].隧道建设(中英文),2018,38(增2):373-378.
[6] 舒计城.粉细砂地层大直径泥水盾构掘进控制分析[J].铁道建筑技术,2024(12):182-185,198.
[7] 刘伟,刘永胜,孙振川,等.基于线性回归的大漂石地层盾构掘进参数研究[J].铁道建筑技术,2024,(11):183-186,191.
[8] 王营建,王祖贤,施成华,等.南昌典型地层土压平衡盾构掘进参数演化规律及地层可掘性分析[J].隧道建设(中英文),2023,43(增2):263-272.
[9] 乔国华.盾构掘进中地层特征的实时识别方法[J].地下空间与工程学报,2023,19(6):2039-2044,2071.
[10] 李雪,吴九七,郭庆飞,等.基于量纲理论的盾构掘进总推力计算模型[J].地下空间与工程学报,2022,18(增2):573-577.
[11] 黄继辉,唐志成,张晓辉,等.EFPI的地层关联性与复杂地层盾构掘进参数的演化规律分析[J].隧道建设(中英文),2021,41(增2):215-221.
[12] 胡珉,樊杰.基于K-means聚类算法的盾构掘进参数设定方法研[J].隧道建设(中英文),2018,38(11):1772-1777.
[13] 徐汪豪,倪婉昱,赵海涛,等.清华园盾构隧道复杂互层地层下的掘进参数研究[J].隧道建设(中英文),2018,38(增2):373-378.
[14] 于云龙,管晓明,王旭春,等.砂黏复合地层盾构掘进参数变化规律及掘进速率预测研究[J].隧道建设(中英文),2019,39(7):1125-1131.
[15] 郭雪刚,车炳亿,夏博洋.双线盾构隧道下穿河道变形特征及关键掘进参数研究[J].现代隧道技术,2024,61(增1):425-431.
[16] 杨文钰,郑俊杰,仉文岗,等.基于间隙参数法的软土盾构隧道施工不确定性表征[J].岩土工程学报,2024,46(增2):107-113.
[17] 张慧鹏,张康健,夏明,等.中强风化泥质粉砂岩复合地层盾构掘进参数控制[J].地下空间与工程学报,2022,18(6):2016-2026.
[18] 陈建福,王凯,陈中天,等.跨海隧道孤石密集及基岩凸起段盾构适应性分析[J].地下空间与工程学报,2021,17(3):856-863.