理论与试验研究

新型装配式密布孔带分叉注浆锚杆承载性能研究

  • 黄金坤 ,
  • 金仁才 ,
  • 张鹏 ,
  • 姜平伟 ,
  • 刘瑛
展开
  • 1.中国十七冶集团有限公司,安徽 马鞍山 243000;
    2.上海交通大学 船舶海洋与建筑工程学院,上海 200240;
    3.安徽工业大学 机械工程学院,安徽 马鞍山 234000;
    4.北京工业大学 建筑工程学院,北京 100124;
    5.浙江晟元建筑设计有限公司,浙江 金华 321000
黄金坤(1992—),男,江苏泰兴人,博士,高级工程师,主要从事岩土工程、地下工程等领域的施工与科研工作。E-mail:jkunhuang@163.com

收稿日期: 2025-04-28

  网络出版日期: 2026-01-26

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(52409135);安徽省重点研究与开发计划项目(2023t07020018);安徽省住房城乡建设科学技术计划项目(2024-YF094)

Research on the Bearing Performance of a New Type of Prefabricated Dense Hole Belt Bifurcated Grouting Anchor Rod

  • Huang Jinkun ,
  • Jin Rencai ,
  • Zhang Peng ,
  • Jiang Pingwei ,
  • Liu Ying
Expand
  • 1. China MCC17 Group Co. Ltd., Maanshan, Anhui 243000, P. R. China;
    2. School of Naval Architecture, Ocean and Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P. R. China;
    3. School of Mechanical Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan, Anhui 234000, P. R. China;
    4. The College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, P. R. China;
    5. Zhejiang Shengyuan Architectural Design Co., Ltd., Jinhua, Zhejiang 321000, P. R. China

Received date: 2025-04-28

  Online published: 2026-01-26

摘要

为提升中空注浆锚杆锚固承载性能,克服因地下水浮力而导致地基基础变形难题,研发了一种装配式密布孔带分叉的多用途中空注浆锚杆。利用正交试验法设计了锚杆拉拔试验方案,并借助数值计算方法,研究了不同设计参数(周向注浆孔数量、轴向注浆孔距离、注浆孔孔径及相邻注浆孔之间的偏角,简称孔数、孔距、孔径及孔偏角)与锚杆的抗拉强度之间响应规律,得出最佳因素水平组合,并对最佳因素水平组合锚杆进行真实应力-位移分析。结果表明:各影响因素对锚杆杆体抗拉强度的主次顺序为孔距>孔数>孔偏角>孔径,其中孔距因素贡献率最大为69.65%,孔距因素对于杆体抗拉强度影响呈现正比关系;锚杆拉拔锚固变形经历了弹性黏合、塑性变形、塑性失效、滑移脱黏四个阶段的发展,最后结果表明锚杆与混凝土之间黏结失效是锚固性能下降的主要原因。

本文引用格式

黄金坤 , 金仁才 , 张鹏 , 姜平伟 , 刘瑛 . 新型装配式密布孔带分叉注浆锚杆承载性能研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2025 , 21(S2) : 683 -689 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.S2.18

Abstract

In order to improve the anchorage bearing capacity of hollow grouting anchor rods and effectively overcome the issue of foundation deformation caused by groundwater buoyancy, a novel multi-purpose prefabricated hollow grouting anchor rod with dense holes and branching grouting was developed. An orthogonal experimental method was used to design the anchor rod pull-out test scheme. Using numerical calculation methods, the response relationship between different design parameters (i.e., circumferential grouting hole number, axial grouting hole distance, hole diameter, and the offset angle between adjacent grouting holes, abbreviated as hole number, hole distance, hole diameter, and hole offset angle) and the anchor rod's tensile strength was studied. The optimal factor-level combination was obtained, and the real stress-displacement analysis was conducted on the anchor rod with the optimal factor-level combination. The results show that: The influence factors on the tensile strength of the anchor rod body follow the order: hole distance > hole number > hole offset angle > hole diameter, with the hole distance factor contributing the most (69.65%). The effect of the hole distance factor on the tensile strength of the rod is proportional. The anchor rod's pull-out anchorage deformation undergoes four stages: elastic bonding, plastic deformation, plastic failure, and slippage debonding. These results indicate that the bonding failure between the anchor rod and the concrete is the primary cause of the reduction in anchorage performance.

参考文献

[1] Liu Y G,Xia K,Wang B T,et al.Experimental Investigation on the Anchorage Performance of a Tension-Compression-Dispersed Composite Anti-Floating Anchor[J].Applied Sciences,2023,13(21):12016.
[2] 万样,彭畅.某中庭式地下室上浮开裂研究与加固设计[J].建筑科学,2024,40(9):128-134.
[3] 孟凡雨.新型伞型锚杆的承载特性模型试验及数值模拟研究[D].扬州:扬州大学,2023.
[4] 王艳坤,宋玲,刘杰,等.锚杆—土工格室复合结构边坡防护有限元数值分析[J].公路,2021,66(11):20-26.
[5] 中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部.建筑地基基础设计规范(GB50007-2011)[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2013.
[6] 尹胜,周宗红,张晶,等.地下掘进巷道富水破碎围岩锚杆支护参数优化[J].有色金属工程,2024,14(2):119-127.
[7] 涂兵雄,蔡燕燕,何锦芳,等.新型拉压复合型锚杆锚固性能研究Ⅲ:现场试验[J].岩土工程学报,2019,41(5):846-854.
[8] Park H,Lee S R,Kim N K,et al.A numerical study of the pullout behavior of grout anchors underreamed by pulse discharge technology[J].Computers and Geotechnics,2013,47:78-90.
[9] 刘钟,郭钢,张义,等.囊式扩体锚杆施工技术与工程应用[J].岩土工程学报,2014,36(增2):205-211.
[10] Zhou L.Simulation and numerical analysis on anti-float anchor by field rock and soil tests[J].AppliedMechanicsand Materials.2014,3629(686):671-675.
[11] Li M,Ma P,Rao Z R,et al.Study on bond mechanics ofantifloating anchor in red sandstone[J].IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science,2020,474(7):1918-1924.
[12] 董捷,陶春晨,张国祥,等.变截面底端扩体型锚杆在粉质黏土中的承载特性模型试验研究[J].铁道建筑,2022,62(7):127-132.
[13] Zhu Y,Li Y,Tang Z X,et al.Experimental Study on and Finite Element Analysis of the Axial Compression Bearing Capacity of a UHPC Transfer Device for Pre-Stressed Anti-Floating Anchor Rods[J].Buildings,2024,14(4):1075.
[14] 钱锦源.黏土中螺旋锚承载特性数值分析[D].吉林:东北电力大学,2022.
[15] Bai X Y,Zhao X M,Yan N,et al.Field test of GFRP bar anti-floating anchor slurry-rock interface bonding performance[J].Composite Structures,2024,331:117893.
[16] 黄金坤,钱元弟,程攀,等.装配式密布孔带分叉的多用途中空注浆锚杆[P].中国专利:CN202111178495.3,2023-03-31.
[17] 陶文斌,吴平平,陈铁林,等.基于锚杆拉拔试验优化锚固承载特性研究[J].煤炭科学技术,2022,50(9):10-19.
[18] 殷文豪,张建彪,王小龙,等.固化水泥土的力学与微观特性研究[J].土工基础,2024,38(3):530-534.
[19] Panesar D K,Zhang R.Performance comparison of cement replacing materials in concrete:Limestone fillers and supplementary cementing materials-A review[J].Construction and Building Materials,2020,251:118866.
[20] Bilek V,Bonczková S,Hurta J,et al.Bond strength between reinforcing steel and different types of concrete[J].Procedia Engineering,2017,190:243-247.
文章导航

/