防灾与环境

浅埋隧道地层瓦斯驱替措施性能及影响因素研究

  • 苏培东 ,
  • 石疏桐 ,
  • 李有贵
展开
  • 西南石油大学 地球科学与技术学院,成都 610500
苏培东(1973—),男,四川眉山人,博士,教授,主要从事地质工程和有害气体对工程建设危害方面的教学和研究工作。E-mail:spdong@126.com
石疏桐(2000—),男,四川德阳人,硕士生,主要从事地质工程和地质灾害领域的研究工作。E-mail:1609615962@qq.com

收稿日期: 2025-01-02

  网络出版日期: 2025-12-31

Research on the Performance and Influencing Factors of Gas Displacement Measures in Shallow Buried Tunnel Strata

  • Su Peidong ,
  • Shi Shutong ,
  • Li Yougui
Expand
  • School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, P. R. China

Received date: 2025-01-02

  Online published: 2025-12-31

摘要

针对浅埋隧道穿越高瓦斯地层治理效果不理想、施工风险高的问题,基于流体多孔介质理论,将煤层瓦斯驱替抽采技术应用于高瓦斯地层浅埋隧道施工治理。采用理论分析、数值模拟的方法分析了地层瓦斯驱替的性能,确定了瓦斯驱替影响范围、瓦斯驱替时间,对可能影响驱替性能的抽排负压、注气压力、地层渗透率、钻孔孔径4个因素进行研究,最后通过现场实验对地层瓦斯驱替数值模拟结果进行论证。结果表明:在抽排负压PC=50 kPa和注气压力PZ=2.0 MPa条件下,注气、抽排孔间距12 m时采用注气40 min,同时抽排90 min达到的驱替效果较好;抽排负压越小驱替性能越好,但抽排负压对驱替进程影响较小;注气压力的提高能显著提高瓦斯抽排量、减少驱替时间;地层瓦斯下降量、抽排孔瓦斯流量与渗透率有着近线性的正相关性;对于目前常用钻孔孔径来说,增大钻孔孔径对地层瓦斯驱替治理效果影响不明显;由于地层条件、设备限制、施工扰动等因素,现场实验与数值模拟瓦斯含量监测数据存在一定差异,但两者在驱替效果和时间进程上具有较高的吻合度。

本文引用格式

苏培东 , 石疏桐 , 李有贵 . 浅埋隧道地层瓦斯驱替措施性能及影响因素研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2025 , 21(6) : 2203 -2216 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.06.35

Abstract

In response to the unsatisfactory treatment effect and high construction risk of shallow buried tunnels crossing high gas formations, based on the theory of fluid porous media, the coal seam gas displacement and extraction technology is applied to the construction treatment of shallow buried tunnels in high gas formations. The performance of gas displacement in the formation was analyzed using theoretical analysis and numerical simulation methods. The influence range and time of gas displacement were determined. Four factors that may affect displacement performance, including negative pressure of drainage, gas injection pressure, formation permeability, and borehole diameter, were studied. Finally, the numerical simulation results of gas displacement in the formation were demonstrated through on-site experiments. The results show that under the condition of negative pressure PC=50 kPa and injection pressure PZ=2.0 MPa, when the distance between injection and extraction holes is 12 m, gas injection for 40 min is used, and the displacement effect achieved by pumping for 90 min is better. The smaller the suction negative pressure, the better the displacement performance, but the impact of suction negative pressure on the displacement process is relatively small; The increase of gas injection pressure can significantly increase gas drainage capacity and reduce displacement time; There is a nearly linear positive correlation between the decrease in formation gas, gas flow rate from drainage holes, and permeability; For the commonly used borehole diameter, increasing the borehole diameter has little effect on the effectiveness of gas displacement control in the formation. Due to factors such as geological conditions, equipment limitations, and construction disturbances, there are certain differences between on-site experiments and numerical simulations of gas content monitoring data. However, the two have a high degree of consistency in terms of displacement effect and time progress.

参考文献

[1] 苏培东, 黎俊麟, 徐正宣, 等.非煤系地层浅层天然气赋存规律及瓦斯隧道工程防护方案[J].中国铁道科学, 2021, 42(2): 88-97.(Su Peidong, Li Junlin, Xu Zhengxuan, et al.The occurrence pattern of shallow natural gas in non coal bearing strata and the protection plan for gas tunnel engineering[J].China Railway Science, 2021, 42 (2): 88-97.(in Chinese))
[2] 赵淑云, 程学友, 朱祝龙, 等.长大地铁区间隧道双压通风模型实验与模拟[J].地下空间与工程学报, 2021, 17(增1): 101-107.(Zhao Shuyun, Cheng Xueyou, Zhu Zhulong, et al.Experimental and simulation of dual pressure ventilation model for long subway section tunnels[J].Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2021, 17 (Supp.1): 101-107.(in Chinese))
[3] 段军朝, 申兴柱, 徐朝阳.地铁瓦斯隧道安全防控管理体系研究与应用[J].城市轨道交通研究, 2021, 24(10): 157-160, 165.(Duan Junchao, Shen Xingzhu, Xu Chaoyang.Research and application of safety prevention and control management system forgas tunnel in subway[J].Urban Rail Transit Research, 2021, 24 (10): 157-160,165.(in Chinese))
[4] 唐斌, 徐文平.瓦斯隧道施工机械车辆防爆改装形式探讨及建议[J].现代隧道技术, 2019, 56(5): 67-71, 103.(Tang Bin, Xu Wenping.Exploration and suggestions on explosion-proof retrofitting forms for gas tunnel construction machinery and vehicles[J].Modern Tunnel Technology, 2019, 56 (5): 67-71,103.(in Chinese))
[5] 苏培东, 张睿, 杜宇本, 等.基于Kriging估值法的非煤隧道瓦斯预测[J].地下空间与工程学报, 2021, 17(3):953-960.(Su Peidong, Zhang Rui, Du Yuben, et al.Gas prediction in non coal tunnels based on Kriging valuation method[J].Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2021,17 (3): 953-960.(in Chinese))
[6] 周捷, 席锦州.综合超前地质预报在新铜锣山隧道中的运用[J].现代隧道技术, 2017, 54(4): 207-212.(Zhou Jie, Xi Jinzhou.Application of comprehensive advanced geological forecasting in the New Tongluoshan Tunnel[J].Modern Tunnel Technology, 2017, 54 (4): 207-212.(in Chinese))
[7] 苗回归, 黄飞, 李树清, 等.基于数值模拟-多元线性回归的大断面隧道平均瓦斯浓度检测位置研究[J].现代隧道技术, 2023, 60(5): 128-135.(Miao Huigui, Huang Fei, Li Shuqing, et al.Research on the detection location of average gas concentration in large section tunnels based on numerical simulation multiple linear regression[J].Modern Tunnel Technology, 2023, 60 (5): 128-135.(in Chinese))
[8] 刘雄伟, 刘科.铁路隧道揭煤防突设计与施工[J].交通节能与环保, 2018, 14(1): 89-92.(Liu Xiongwei, Liu Ke.Design and construction of coal mining and outburst prevention in railway tunnels[J].Transportation Energy Conservation and Environmental Protection, 2018, 14 (1): 89-92.(in Chinese))
[9] 苏培东, 何坤宸, 黎俊麟, 等.成都平原浅层天然气高瓦斯隧道抽排性能评价[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 52(1): 86-94, 156.(Su Peidong, He Kunchen, Li Junlin, et al.Evaluation of drainage performance of high gas shallow gas tunnel in Chengdu plain[J].Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 52 (1): 86-94, 156.(in Chinese))
[10] 林海飞, 季鹏飞, 孔祥国, 等.我国低渗煤层井下注气驱替增流抽采瓦斯技术进展及前景展望[J].煤炭学报, 2023, 48(2): 730-749.(Lin Haifei, Ji Pengfei, Kong Xiangguo, et al.Progress and prospect of gas injection displacement, flow enhancement, and gas extraction technology in low-permeability coal seams in China[J].Journal of Coal Science, 2023, 48 (2): 730-749.(in Chinese))
[11] 张钧祥, 李波, 韦纯福, 等.基于扩散-渗流机理瓦斯抽采三维模拟研究[J].地下空间与工程学报, 2018, 14(1):109-116.(Zhang Junxiang, Li Bo, Wei Chunfu, et al.Three dimensional simulation study of gas extraction based on diffusion seepage mechanism[J].Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2018,14 (1): 109-116.(in Chinese))
[12] Torno S, Toraño J.On the prediction of toxic fumes from underground blasting operations and dilution ventilation.Conventional and numerical models[J].Tunneling & Underground Space Technology,2020,96: 103194.
[13] Shi J Q, Durucan S, Fujioka M.A reservoir simulation study of CO2 injection and N2 flooding at the Ishikari coalfield CO2 storage pilot project, Japan[J].International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control,2008,2(1): 47-57.
[14] 杨鑫.低渗煤层高压注氮驱替强化抽采技术及应用研究[D].北京:中国矿业大学(北京), 2019.(Yang Xin.Research on high-pressure nitrogen injection displacement enhanced extraction technology and its application in low-permeability coal seams[D].Beijing: China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), 2019.(in Chinese))
[15] Wen H, Wei G M, Ma L, et al.Damage characteristics of coal microstructure with liquid CO2 freezing-thawing[J].Fuel, 2019, 249: 169-177.
[16] Zhu X Z, Wei S Y, Luo W D, et al.Numerical simulation and experimental study on improving gas drainage by hydraulic fracturing[J].Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 2023, 45(1): 1965-1982.
[17] Wang X N, Yuan S J, Jiang B Y.Experimental investigation of the wetting ability of surfactants to coals dust based on physical chemistry characteristics of the different coal samples[J].Advanced Powder Technology, 2019, 30(8): 1696-1708.
[18] Gong H R, Wang K, Wang G D, et al.Underground coal seam gas displacement by injecting nitrogen: field test and effect prediction[J].Fuel, 2021, 306: 121646.
[19] 张鹏, 岳广义, 梁卫国.瓦斯隧道中煤的渗透性研究[J].山西煤炭, 2012(2): 51-54.(Zhang Peng, Yue Guangyi, Liang Weiguo.Study on permeability of middling coal in gas tunnel[J].Shanxi Coal, 2012(2): 51-54.(in Chinese))
[20] 范凯祥, 申玉生, 高波, 等.富硫化氢隧道注碱固硫机理与数值模拟[J].中国公路学报, 2019, 32(8): 145-155.(Fan Kaixiang, Shen Yusheng, Gao Bo, et al.Mechanism and numerical simulation of alkali injection and sulfur fixation in hydrogen sulfide rich tunnels[J].Journal of China Highway Engineering, 2019, 32(8): 145-155.(in Chinese))
[21] Fan C J, Yang L.Investigation on coal skeleton deformation in CO2 injection enhanced CH4 drainage from underground coal seam[J].Frontiers in Earth Science, 2021, 9:766011.
[22] Li Z B, Wang S R, Wei G M, et al.The seepage driving mechanism and effect of CO2 displacing CH4 in coal seam under different pressures[J].Energy, 2024, 293: 130740.
[23] 杨宏民, 夏会辉, 王兆丰.注气驱替煤层瓦斯时效特性影响因素分析[J].采矿与安全工程学报, 2013, 30(2): 273-277,284.(Yang Hongmin, Xia Huihui, Wang Zhaofeng.Analysis of influencing factors on the timeliness characteristics of coal seam gas displacement by gas injection[J].Journal of Mining and Safety Engineering, 2013, 30 (2): 273-277,284.(in Chinese))
文章导航

/