理论与试验研究

RT模式黏性有限土体非极限状态土压力数值解

  • 陕耀 ,
  • 董雅丞 ,
  • 吴遥杰 ,
  • 陈志宁 ,
  • 姚西平
展开
  • 1.同济大学 道路与交通工程教育部重点实验室,上海 201804;
    2.上海市轨道交通结构耐久与系统安全重点实验室,上海 201804;
    3.南京地铁建设有限责任公司,南京 210017;
    4.江苏省铁路集团有限公司,南京 210012;
    5.江苏省智能与绿色铁路工程研究中心,南京 210012
陕耀(1984—),男,山东济宁人,博士,研究员,主要从事轨道交通线路系统动力学、路基沉降控制、基坑工程等领域的研究和教学工作。E-mail: shanyao@tongji.edu.cn
董雅丞(2000—),男,山西大同人,博士生,主要从事岩土工程、地下工程等领域的研究工作。E-mail:2310809@tongji.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2025-04-30

  网络出版日期: 2025-12-31

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(52378458)

Numerical Solutions of Non-limit State Earth Pressure for Limited Cohesive Soils under RT Mode

  • Shan Yao ,
  • Dong Yacheng ,
  • Wu Yaojie ,
  • Chen Zhining ,
  • Yao Xiping
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of the Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, P. R. China;
    2. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Rail Infrastructure Durability and System Safety, Shanghai 201804, P. R. China;
    3. Nanjing Metro Construction Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210017, P. R. China;
    4. Jiangsu Railway Group Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210012, P. R. China;
    5. Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Intelligent and Green Railway, Nanjing 210012, P. R. China

Received date: 2025-04-30

  Online published: 2025-12-31

摘要

为探明刚性挡墙绕顶部转动 ( RT ) 模式下有限土体非极限状态土压力的变化规律,解决既有土压力计算方法中墙体位移、水平剪切应力等影响因素考虑不全的难题,基于微分单元法框架,建立了一种能综合考虑墙体位移、土体强度参数( cm -φm )、土拱效应和水平剪切应力影响的有限土体被动土压力数值计算方法。结合三轴卸荷试验与应力Mohr圆获取非极限状态下土体强度参数(cm-φm )与墙体位移的关系,依据土拱效应原理对有限土体进行应力分析,依据水平与竖直方向的静力平衡方程构建沿深度方向的被动土压力数值迭代算法。通过与已有研究对比验证了所提方法的合理性与准确性。结果表明:RT模式下有限土体受到的侧向约束作用有助于进一步发挥土体的抗剪强度;有限土体被动土压力沿深度方向呈非线性分布,土压力大小会随着土体强度参数(cm-φm )、初始滑裂面倾角、墙底位移比的减小以及宽深比的增大而降低。本文方法可为实际工程中挡土结构经济性设计提供理论指导。

本文引用格式

陕耀 , 董雅丞 , 吴遥杰 , 陈志宁 , 姚西平 . RT模式黏性有限土体非极限状态土压力数值解[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2025 , 21(6) : 1888 -1898 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.06.05

Abstract

To elucidate the variations in non-limit state earth pressure for limited soils mass under the rotation at the top of a rigid retaining wall (RT) mode, and to address the incomplete consideration of wall displacement, horizontal shear stress, and other influencing factors in existing earth pressure calculation methods, a numerical calculation method for passive earth pressure of a finite soil mass was developed within the framework of the differential element method. This method integrates considerations of wall displacement, soil strength parameters (cm-φm), soil arching effects, and the impact of horizontal shear stress. By combining triaxial unloading tests and stress Mohr circles, the relationship between soil strength parameters (cm-φm) under non-limit states and wall displacement was derived. Based on the principles of soil arching effect, stress analysis of the finite soil body was conducted, and static equilibrium equations for differential soil elements were established, further creating a numerical iterative format for passive earth pressure within a depth range. The proposed method was validated for its rationality and accuracy through comparisons with existing research. The results show that the lateral constraints under the RT mode help enhance the soil's shear resistance; Non-linear distribution of passive earth pressures along depth in finite soils; the magnitude of earth pressure decreases with a reduction in soil strength parameters (cm-φm), a decrease in the initial slip surface angle, a reduction in the bottom of wall displacement ratio, and an increase in the width-to-depth ratio. The method of this paper can provide theoretical guidance for the economic design of retaining structures in practical engineering.

参考文献

[1] Lai F, Yang D, Liu S, et al.Towards an improved analytical framework to estimate active earth pressure in narrow c-Φ soils behind rotating walls about the base[J].Computers and Geotechnics, 2022, 141: 104544.
[2] Sun Y Y, Zhou S H, Luo Z.Basal-heave analysis of pit-in-pit braced excavations in soft clays.Computers and Geotechnics, 2017, 81: 294-306.
[3] 冷伍明, 姚康, 门小雄, 等.考虑工程桩效应的滨海深基坑变形特性分析[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2023,20(4):1347-1358.(Leng Wuming, Yao Kang, Men Xiaoxiong, et al.Analyses on deformation characteristics of coastal deep excavation considering the effect of engineering piles[J].Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2023, 20(4): 1347-1358.(in Chinese))
[4] 赖丰文,陈福全,万梁龙.考虑不完全土拱效应的浅层地基竖向应力计算[J].岩石力学, 2018, 39(7): 2546-2554.(Lai Fengwen, Chen Fuquan, Wan Lianglong.Vertical stress calculation of shallow foundations based on partially developed soil arching effect[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(7): 2546-2554.(in Chinese))
[5] Lou M, Wang H, Chen X, et al.Structure-soil-structure interaction: Literature review[J].Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering, 2011, 31(12): 1724-1731.
[6] Bang S.Active earth pressure behind retaining walls[J].Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1985, 111(3): 407-412.
[7] 盛兴旺, 林超, 郑纬奇, 等.软黏土地区深大基坑工程桩—连续墙体系空间变形效应[J].铁道科学与工程学报, 2024, 21(2): 591-601.(Sheng Xingwang, Lin Chao, Zheng Weiqi, et al.Spatial deformation effect of pile-diaphragm wall system in deep and large foundation pit in soft clay area[J].Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2024, 21(2): 591-601.(in Chinese))
[8] 龚慈.不同位移模式下刚性挡土墙土压力计算方法研究[D].杭州: 浙江大学, 2005.(Gong Ci.Research on the calculation method of soil pressure of rigid retaining wall under different displacement modes[D].Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2005.(in Chinese))
[9] 杨庆光, 刘杰, 何杰, 等.平移模式下挡墙非极限土压力计算方法[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(增1): 3399-3406.(Yang Qingguang, Liu Jie, He Jie, et al.Calculation method of non-limiting earth pressure of retaining wall in translation mode[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(Supp.1): 3399-3406.(in Chinese))
[10] 徐日庆, 徐叶斌, 程康, 等.有限土体下考虑土拱效应的非极限主动土压力解[J].岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(2): 362-371.(Xü Riqing, Xu Yebin, Cheng Kang, et al.A method to calculate the active earth pressure with considering soil arching effect under the nonlimit state of clay[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(2): 362-371.(in Chinese))
[11] 周健, 高冰, 彭述权.不同位移模式下挡土墙的模型试验及数值模拟[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(增2): 3721-3727.(Zhou Jian, Gao Bing, Peng Shuquan.Model test and numerical simulation of retaining wall under different displacement modes[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(Supp.2): 3721-3727.(in Chinese))
[12] 谢涛, 罗强, 张良, 等.Coulomb 模型下考虑墙体侧向位移的土压力计算[J].岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(1): 194-200.(Xie Tao, Luo Qiang, Zhang Liang, et al.Relationship between earth pressure and wall displacement based on Coulomb earth pressure model[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(1): 194-200.(in Chinese))
[13] Lai F, Chen S, Xue J, et al.New analytical solutions for shallow cohesive soils overlying trench voids under various slip surfaces[J].Transportation Geotechnics, 2020, 25:100411.
[14] 王崇宇, 刘晓平, 张家强, 等.刚性墙后有限宽度土体被动滑裂面特征试验研究[J].岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1839-1849.(Wang Chongyu, Liu Xiaoping, Zhang Jiaqiang, et al.Experimental study on passive slip surface of limited width soil behind a rigid wall[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(7): 1839-1849.(in Chinese))
[15] 赖丰文, 刘松玉, 杨大禹, 等.有限宽度填土挡墙主动土压力的普适解法[J].岩土工程学报, 2022, 44(3): 483-491.(Lai Fengwen, Liu Songyu, Yang Dayü, et al.Generalized solution to active earth pressure exerted onto retaining wall with narrow backfills[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44(3): 483-491.(in Chinese))
[16] Chen F, Miao G, Lai F.Base instability triggered by hydraulic uplift of pit-in-pit braced excavations in soft clay overlying a confined aquifer[J].KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2020, 24(6): 1717-1730.
[17] 陈奕柏, 柯才桐, 高洪波, 等.考虑变位影响的刚性挡墙非极限土压力研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2015(5): 1060-1070.(Chen Yibai, Ke Caitong, Gao Hongbo, et al.Study on non-limit earth pressure of rigid retaining wall considering displacement[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(5): 1060-1070.(in Chinese))
[18] Anagnostou G, K Kovári.Face stability conditions with earth-pressure-balanced shields[J].Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1996, 11(2): 165-173.
[19] 卢坤林,杨扬.非极限主动土压力计算方法初探[J].岩土力学, 2010, 31(2): 615-619.(Lu Kunlin, Yang Yang.Preliminary study of active earth pressure under nonlimit state[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(2): 615-619.(in Chinese))
[20] 马明, 李明东, 郎钞棚, 等.刚性挡墙绕底转动时的非极限主动土压力数值解[J].应用数学和力学,2022,43(3):312-321.(Ma Ming, Li Mingdong, Lang Chaopeng, et al.Numerical Solutions of the Nonlimit-State Active Earth Pressure Under Backfill Wall Rotation Around the Bottom[J].Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2022, 43(3): 312-321.(in Chinese))
[21] 张恒志, 徐长节, 何寨兵, 等.基于离散元方法的不同挡墙变位模式下有限土体主动土压力研究[J].岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 257-267.(Zhang Hengzhi, Xü Changjie, He Zhaibing, et al.Study of active earth pressure of finite soils under different retaining wall movement modes based on discrete element method[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(1): 257-267.(in Chinese))
[22] Fang Y S, Ishibashi I.Static earth pressures with various wall movements[J].Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1986, 112(3): 317-333.
[23] Matsuzawa H, Hazarika H.Analyses of active earth pressure against rigid retaining wall subjected to different modes of movement[J].Soils and Foundations, 1996, 36(3): 51-65.
[24] 赵梦怡, 谢强, 康景文, 等.柔性支护黏性土基坑非极限被动土压力研究.工程地质学报, 2018, 26(4): 898-904.(Zhao Mengyi, Xie Qiang, Kang Jingwen, et al.Passive earth pressure of cohesive soil under nonlimit state against flexible retaining structure[J].Journal of Engineering Geology, 2018, 26(4): 898-904.(in Chinese))
[25] 陈桥枫, 雷升祥,赵伟,等.基于渐近法的城市近接地下空间有限土体土压力计算方法研究[J].铁道科学与工程学报, 2022, 19(10): 3025-3034.(Chen Qiaofeng, Lei Shengxiang, Zhao Wei, et al.Study of the earth pressure for the limited soil adjacent to underground space in urban areas based on the asymptotic method[J].Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022, 19(10): 3025-3034.(in Chinese))
[26] 刘杰锋, 曹海莹, 王优群, 等.考虑土拱效应的黏性土主动土压力解析解[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2023,20(12):4604-4612.(Liu Jiefeng, Cao Haiying, Wang Youqun, et al.Analytical solution of active earth pressure considering soil arching for cohesive soil[J].Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2023, 20(12): 4604-4612.(in Chinese))
[27] Wu Y J, Zhao Y, Gong Q M, et al.Alternant active and passive trapdoor problem: From experimental investigation to mathematical modeling[J].Acta Geotechnica, 2022, 17: 2971-2994.
[28] Zhao Y, Gong Q, Wu Y, et al.Progressive failure mechanism in granular materials subjected to an alternant active and passive trapdoor[J].Transportation Geotechnics, 2021, 28: 100529.
[29] 应宏伟, 张金红, 王小刚, 等.有限土体刚性挡墙平动模式被动土压力试验研究[J].岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(6): 978-986.(Ying Hongwei, Zhang Jinhong, Wang Xiaogang, et al.Experimental analysis of passive earth pressure against rigid retaining wall under translation mode for finite soils[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(6): 978-986.(in Chinese))
[30] Chen F, Lin Y, Yang J.Passive earth pressure of narrow cohesionless backfill against inclined rigid retaining walls under translation mode[J].Soils and Foundations, 2020, 60(5): 1226-1240.
文章导航

/