防灾与环境

不同倾角岩层分界面竖井掘进机地震波场数值研究

  • 郭志东 ,
  • 李光 ,
  • 祝贺超 ,
  • 胡世超 ,
  • 刘翔宇
展开
  • 1.鞍钢基石矿业有限公司,辽宁 鞍山 114047;
    2.北京科技大学 土木与资源工程学院,北京 100083
郭志东(1971—),男,辽宁辽阳人,硕士,教授级高级工程师,从事采矿工程、竖井掘进等方面的研究。E-mail:guozhidong2023@163.com

收稿日期: 2024-12-20

  网络出版日期: 2025-10-17

基金资助

国家重点研发计划专项(2021YFB3401501)

Numerical Study on Seismic Wave Field of Shaft Boring Machine in Rock Layer Interface with Different Dip Angles

  • Guo Zhidong ,
  • Li Guang ,
  • Zhu Hechao ,
  • Hu Shichao ,
  • Liu Xiangyu
Expand
  • 1. Ansteel Cornerstone Mining Corporation, Co., Ltd., Anshan, Liaoning 114047, P.R. China;
    2. School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, P.R. China

Received date: 2024-12-20

  Online published: 2025-10-17

摘要

竖井掘进机是综合机械化凿井的发展方向和趋势,基于掘进机破岩震源地震波场进行超前地质探测是保障竖井掘进机施工安全的有效方法。为研究掘进机破岩震源的地震波场特性,以常见地质情况岩层分界面为例,通过全波场数值模拟软件Tesseral建立不同倾角岩层分界面的地质模型,采用连续随机信号作为破岩震源进行正演计算,得到掘进机破岩震源地震波场。以无岩层分界面为参照组,去除地震波场中的直达波,获取地震波场中的反射波、绕射波等,分析反射波的时域特征,通过小波包对比各岩层分界面反射波的频域特征。结果表明:不同倾角岩层分界面地震波场中的反射波主频在50~200 Hz范围内,多种波的组分和主频较为复杂,在600 Hz以内均有分布;岩层分界面倾角越大,波的传播距离越小,反射波到达时间越早,幅值也有所增加,各个倾角的能量均集中在70~125 Hz之间;随着岩层分界面倾角增大,各倾角反射波的能量值越大,而低频成分的能量占比降低;震源主频对各岩层分界面的反射波时域及频域特征影响较小;地质条件对岩层分界面的反射波时域及频域特征影响较大,上软下硬地质条件的反射波最大幅值和能量远大于上硬下软地质条件,上软下硬反射波低频段的能量占比较小。研究结果可为掘进机破岩震源的地震波场理论分析提供参考。

本文引用格式

郭志东 , 李光 , 祝贺超 , 胡世超 , 刘翔宇 . 不同倾角岩层分界面竖井掘进机地震波场数值研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2025 , 21(5) : 1793 -1801 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.05.35

Abstract

Shaft boring machine is the development direction and trend of comprehensive mechanized shaft sinking. Advanced geological exploration based on the seismic wave field of the rock-breaking source of the shaft boring machine is an effective method to ensure the construction safety of the shaft boring machine. In order to study the seismic wave field characteristics of rock-breaking source of shaft boring machine, taking the rock stratum interface of common geological conditions as an example, the geological model of rock stratum interface with different dip angles is established by using the full wave field numerical simulation software Tesseral. The continuous random signal is used as the rock-breaking source for forward calculation, and the seismic wave field of the rock-breaking source of the shaft boring machine is obtained. Taking the strata without interface as the reference group, the direct wave in the seismic wave field is removed, and the reflected wave, diffraction wave, etc., are obtained in the seismic wave field. The time domain characteristics of the reflected wave are analyzed, and the frequency domain characteristics of the reflected wave at the interface of each rock layer are compared through wavelet packets. The results show that: The dominant frequency of the reflected wave in the seismic wave field at the interface of different dip strata is in the range of 50~200 Hz, and the component and dominant frequency of multiple waves are relatively complex, which are distributed within 600 Hz. With the increase of the dip angle of the rock stratum interface, the smaller the propagation distance of the wave, the earlier the arrival time of the reflected wave, and the greater the amplitude. The energy of each dip angle is concentrated between 70~125 Hz. As the dip angle of the rock stratum interface increases, the energy value of the reflected wave at each dip angle increases, while the energy proportion of the low-frequency component decreases. The main frequency of the seismic source has a relatively small impact on the time-domain and frequency-domain characteristics of the reflected waves at the interfaces of various rock layers. The geological conditions have a significant impact on the time-domain and frequency-domain characteristics of the reflected waves at the rock layer interface. The maximum amplitude and energy of the reflected waves in the upper soft and lower hard geological conditions are much greater than those in the upper hard and lower soft geological conditions. The energy proportion of the low frequency band of the reflected waves in the upper soft and lower hard geological conditions is relatively small. The research results provide a reference for the theoretical understanding of the seismic wave field of the rock-breaking source of the shaft boring machine.

参考文献

[1] 谢和平,张茹,邓建辉,等.基于“深地-地表”联动的深地科学与地灾防控技术体系初探[J].工程科学与技术,2021,53(4):1-12.(Xie Heping,Zhang Ru,Deng Jianhui,et al.A preliminary study on the technical system of deep earth science and geo disaster prevention-control based on the “deep earth-surface” linkage strategy[J].Advanced Engineering Sciences,2021,53(4):1-12.(in Chinese))
[2] 雷天衢,杨立云,康一强.地应力对双刃盘形滚刀破岩效率影响研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2023,19(增2):836-842.(Lei Tianqu,Yang Liyun,Kang Yiqiang.Study on the effect of geostress on rock-breaking efficiency of double disc cutters[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2023,19(Supp.2):836-842.(in Chinese))
[3] 张建国,孙海良,张国川,等.煤矿智能掘进关键技术探讨及工程实践研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2023,19(2):609-621.(Zhang Jianguo,Sun Hailiang,Zhang Guochuan,et al.Discussion on key technologies and engineering practice of intelligent tunneling in coal mine[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2023,19(2):609-621.(in Chinese))
[4] 刘志强,李术才,王杜娟,等.千米竖井硬岩全断面掘进机凿井关键技术与研究路径探析[J].煤炭学报,2022,47(8):3163-3174.(Liu Zhiqiang,Li Shucai,Wang Dujuan,et al.Analysis of key technology and research path of full section boring machine for 1000 km vertical shaft with hard rock strata[J].Journal of China Coal Society,2022,47(8):3163-3174.(in Chinese))
[5] 苏翠侠.大直径竖井掘进机锥面刀盘破岩仿真研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2023,19(6):2020-2027.(Su Cuixia.Rock breaking simulation study of conical cutterhead for large-diameter vertical shaft boring machine[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2023,19(6):2020-2027.(in Chinese))
[6] 荆国业,韩博,刘志强.全断面竖井掘进机凿井技术[J].煤炭工程,2020,52(10):29-33.(Jing Guoye,Han Bo,Liu Zhiqiang.Research on sinking technology of full-section shaft boring machine[J].Coal Engineering,2020,52(10):29-33.(in Chinese)).
[7] 李术才,刘斌,孙怀凤,等.隧道施工超前地质预报研究现状及发展趋势[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2014,33(6):1090-1113.(Li Shucai,Liu Bin,Sun Huaifeng,et al.State of art and trends of advanced geological prediction in tunnel construction[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2014,33(6):1090-1113.(in Chinese))
[8] 许新骥.TBM掘进破岩震源地震波超前地质探测方法及工程应用[D].济南:山东大学,2017.(Xu Xinji.TBM rock-breaking source seismic method and its applications for ahead geological prospecting in TBM construction tunnel[D].Jinan:Shandong University,2017.(in Chinese))
[9] 张凤凯.TBM破岩震源探测数据的全波形反演和逆时偏移成像方法[D].济南:山东大学,2020.(Zhang Fengkai.Full waveform inversion and inverse time migration imaging method of the seismic data while tunneling using TBM drilling noise in tunnel[D].Jinan:Shandong University,2020.(in Chinese))
[10] 李圣林.基于随机震源的巷道地震超前探测信号识别研究[D].淮南:安徽理工大学,2019.(Li Shenglin.Research on recognition of seismic advance detection signal in Roadway Based on random source[D].Huainan:Anhui University of Science and Technology,2019.(in Chinese))
[11] 李亚豪,程久龙,姜旭,等.基于互相关的随掘地震超前探测有效信号提取方法研究[J].中国矿业,2020,29(5):82-85.(Li Yahao,Cheng Jiulong,Jiang Xu,et al.Research on effective signals extraction method of seismic while drilling ahead detection based on cross-correlation[J].China Mining Magazine,2020,29(5):82-85.(in Chinese))
[12] 石少帅,曹天宇,许新骥,等.隧道凿岩台车破岩震源三臂混合先导信号盲源分离方法与工程应用[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2021,29(5):1124-1139.(Shi Shaoshuai,Cao Tianyu,Xu Xinji,et al.Three-arm mixed pilot signal blind source separation method and engineering application of rock breaking seismic source of tunnel rock drilling rig[J].Journal of Basic Science and Engineering,2021,29(5):1124-1139.(in Chinese))
[13] 石少帅,孙昊政,李术才,等.凿岩台车钻头破岩震源地震记录重构方法[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2021,52(12):4405-4414.(Shi Shaoshuai,Sun Haozheng,Li Shucai,et al.Reconstruction method of seismic record of drilling jumbo rock-breaking seismic source[J].Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2021,52(12):4405-4414.(in Chinese))
[14] 王锡文,秦广胜,赵卫锋,等.正演模拟技术在地震采集设计中的应用[J].地球物理学进展,2012,27(2):642-650.(Wang Xiwen,Qin Guangsheng,Zhao Weifeng,et al.The application of forward modeling technique in seismic acquisition design[J].Progress in Geophys,2012,27(2):642-650.(in Chinese))
[15] 张亚红,陈国金.基于Tesseral的盲源地震响应恢复影响因素研究[J].地球物理学进展,2020,35(3):1092-1098.(Zhang Yahong,Chen Guojin.Influencing factors of blind source seismic response recovery based on Tesseral[J].Progress in Geophysics,2020,35(3):1092-1098.(in Chinese))
[16] 谢磊磊,蒋甫玉,常文凯.基于Tesseral2D的水下砂体地震正演计算[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(4):351-355.(Xie Leilei,Jiang Fuyu,Chang Wenkai.Tesseral2D-based earthquake forward simulation of underwater sand strata[J].Journal of Hohai University(Natural Sciences),2015,43(4):351-355.(in Chinese))
[17] Zhong G S,Li J,Zhao K.Structural safety criteria for blasting vibration based on wavelet packet energy spectra[J].Mining Science and Technology,2011,21:35-40.
[18] 费鸿禄,曾翔宇,杨智广.隧道掘进爆破振动对地表影响的小波包分析[J].爆炸与冲击,2017,37(1):77-83.(Fei Honglu,Zeng Xiangyu,Yang Zhiguang.Influence of tunnel excavation blasting vibrationon earth's surface based on wavelet packet analysis[J].Explosion and Shock Waves,2017,37(1):77-83.(in Chinese))
[19] 陈吉辉,仇文革,赵旭伟,等.基于小波包技术地铁隧道分区爆破振动特性研究[J].振动与冲击,2022,41(6):222-228.(Chen Jihui,Qiu Wenge,Zhao Xuwei,et al.Vibration characteristics analysis of the metro tunnel subarea blasting based on wavelet packet technique[J].Journal of Vibration and Shock,2022,41(6):222-228.(in Chinese))
文章导航

/