TBM在通过地表有冲沟的断层破碎带时,易发生卡机事故,处理时间较长、成本较高。为保证TBM通过冲沟断层洞段时的掘进安全,避免出现掌子面塌方、卡机、设备“栽头”等情况,常采用地表预注浆加固技术对冲沟段断层破碎带进行处理。本文针对新疆某水利工程TBM施工穿越地表有冲沟段断层破碎带容易发生卡机的问题,通过数值模拟对比分析了管棚注浆与地表注浆对围岩稳定性的影响,并对两种注浆工法经济效益进行分析。结果表明:在TBM穿越地表有冲沟的断层破碎带洞段时,采用地表预注浆加固技术,浆液能更好填充进围岩裂隙,并提升围岩的完整性与胶结程度;通过钻孔取芯和超声波检测的手段验证了地表预注浆加固充填围岩裂隙效果较好;采用地表预注浆施工,工期上优势明显优于管棚注浆,而当TBM采用管棚注浆脱困存在有较高风险,造成围岩塌方,对施工人员和TBM机均产生较高危险。综合考虑经济性和技术难度,隧洞埋深在70 m的情况下应采用地表预注浆来防范TBM卡机事故的发生。研究可为相似工程提供参考。
When a TBM passes through fault fracture zones with surface gullies, machine jamming accidents are prone to occur, leading to longer processing times and higher costs. To ensure the safety of TBM excavation through the gully fault section and avoid situations such as the collapse of the tunnel face, machine jamming, and equipment "falling head", surface pre-grouting reinforcement technology is commonly used to address the fractured zones of gully-related fault sections. This article focuses on the problem of machine jamming during the TBM construction of a tunnel in Xinjiang, where is a fault fracture zone with gullies on the surface. The effects of pipe shed grouting and surface grouting on the stability of surrounding rock are compared and analyzed through numerical simulation. The economic benefits of the two grouting methods were examined. The results show that: When a TBM passes through fault fracture zones with surface gullies, surface pre-grouting reinforcement technology can be employed. The slurry can better fill the surrounding rock's cracks and improve the surrounding rock's integrity and bonding degree. The effectiveness of surface pre-grouting reinforcement and filling of rock fractures was verified through drilling and ultrasonic testing. Surface pre-grouting construction has a significant advantage over pipe shed grouting in terms of the construction period. However, when TBM uses pipe shed grouting for escape, there is a higher risk of rock collapse, which poses a higher danger to both construction personnel and TBM machines. Considering both economic feasibility and technical difficulty, surface pre-grouting should be used to prevent TBM jamming accidents when the tunnel is buried at a depth of 70 m. The research can provide reference for similar engineering.
[1] 于方正, 朱荣辉, 乔浩利, 等. 敞开式TBM穿越长大断裂带施工技术研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2023, 19(增2): 880-889.
[2] 荣晓洋, 王述红, 关永平, 等. 输水隧洞穿越断层破碎带施工力学效应分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2011, 7(增2): 1615-1618, 1637.
[3] 卢庆钊. 基于AHP-Fuzzy的隧道穿富水断层破碎带突水涌泥评估[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2021, 17(增1): 439-448, 462.
[4] 刘攀. 地表预注浆加固TBM施工隧洞浅埋冲沟段施工效果分析[J]. 陕西水利, 2020(2): 144-146.
[5] 张青林. 重庆地铁隧道TBM始发段的施工技术研究[D]. 北京:北京交通大学, 2011.
[6] 赵静波. 富水软弱围岩超浅埋隧洞快速注浆技术研究[J]. 铁道建筑技术, 2020(7): 131-134, 152.
[7] 王建亚. 地表预注浆在隧洞破碎围岩加固中的应用[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2007.
[8] 叶欣欣, 苗苗, 钟宇健, 等. 浅埋偏压富水隧洞地表预注浆加固效果分析[J]. 现代隧洞技术, 2021, 58(4): 229-236.
[9] 张建军, 黄诒宝, 沈增辉. 地表预注浆在隧洞破碎围岩加固中的应用[J]. 广东建材, 2011, 27(12): 62-64.
[10] 刘世杰, 刘泽, 吴建和, 等. 铁路隧洞全风化花岗岩地层地表预注浆技术[J]. 现代隧洞技术, 2019, 56(6):181-186.
[11] 梁奇. 大断面隧洞浅埋段地表预注浆加固技术研究[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2015, 27(7): 172-174.
[12] 赵继伟, 高杨. 长大隧洞穿越冲沟超浅埋段地表预注浆加固技术[J]. 工程建设与设计, 2021(3): 170-171, 174.
[13] 张新辉, 尹健民, 艾凯, 等. 复杂工程地质条件下深埋长隧洞应力场特征研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2021, 17(2): 421-429.
[14] 张向阳, 任尚磊, 许林峰. 断层错动作用下隧道衬砌围岩破坏机理研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2021, 17(1): 290-299.
[15] 刘银, 张志强, 赵梓彤, 等. 断层破碎带在渗流作用下应力特征及控制[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2019, 15(3): 820-826.
[16] 徐虎城. 断层破碎带敞开式TBM卡机处理与脱困技术探析[J]. 隧洞建设(中英文), 2018, 38(增1): 156-160.
[17] 周振梁, 谭忠盛, 李林峰, 等. TBM隧道围岩-支护动态相互作用机制研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2025,22(1):284-294.
[18] Carranza-torres C, Fairhurst C. The elastoplastic response of underground excavations in rock masses that satisfy the Hoek-Brown failure criterion[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 1999, 36(6): 777-809.
[19] 张霄, 王明年, 于丽, 等. 隧道开挖面预注浆加固稳定性理论计算模型[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2024, 61(5): 42-51.
[20] 许宏发, 耿汉生, 李朝甫, 等. 破碎岩体注浆加固体强度估计[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013,35(11): 2018-2022.