获得未受扰动的土样是岩土工程勘察中的一项挑战,而钻探取土过程中会不可避免地对土样产生一定程度的扰动。为了研究取土工艺在饱和软黏土地层中取样时对土样质量的影响,本文以浙江温州典型淤泥为研究对象,首先通过静力触探试验了解场地地层的分布情况,然后分别使用隐形轴阀式取土器、常规厚壁取土器和敞口式薄壁取土器的取土工艺进行取土对比试验。通过对土样的外观形态、无侧限抗压强度和灵敏度指标、扰动性指标进行比较分析研究,最终得到不同取土工艺对饱和软黏土取土质量影响的定量分析评价。结果表明:采用隐形轴阀式取土器的取土工艺采取土样的扰动性相对最小,取土质量相对最高,敞口式薄壁取土器次之,常规厚壁取土器采取土样的扰动性相对最大,取土质量相对最差;隐形轴阀式取土器所取土样的无侧限抗压强度平均值比常规厚壁取土器高20.2%,比敞口式薄壁取土器高10.3%;利用自重应力下的孔隙比变化率作为土样扰动性大小的定量指标,取土质量相对最差的常规厚壁取土器所取土样的孔隙比变化率平均值比最好的隐形轴阀式取土器增大11.0%;隐形轴阀式取土器在饱和软黏土中采取的土样质量相对最高,试验后得出的岩土参数相对最接近于真实地层的物理力学特性。
Obtaining undisturbed high-quality samples is a challenge in geotechnical investigation, and soil samples will be disturbed to some extent in the process of drilling and sampling. In order to study the influence of sampling technology on the quality of soil samples when sampling in saturated soft clay strata, this paper takes a typical silt in Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, as the research object. Firstly, the stratigraphic distribution of the site was understood by cone penetration test (CPT). Then, comparative tests on the quality of soil samples were conducted by using cryptomorphic shaft-valve type soil sampler, conventional thick wall sampler and open end thin wall sampler, respectively. Through a comparative analysis and research on the appearance morphology, unconfined compressive strength and sensitivity index, disturbance index of soil samples, a quantitative analysis and evaluation of the influence of different sampling technology on the quality of soil sample of the saturated soft clay was finally obtained. The results of the study showed that using the cryptomorphic shaft-valve type soil sampler has the least disturbance and the highest quality on sampling, the open end thin wall sampler is the second, and the conventional thick wall sampler has the highest disturbance and the worst quality. The cryptomorphic shaft-valve type soil sampler has 20.2% higher unconfined compressive strength average value than the conventional thick wall sampler and 10.3% higher than the open end thin wall sampler. Using the rate of change of pore ratio under self-weight stress as a quantitative indicator of the magnitude of soil sample disturbance, the conventional thick wall sampler with the worst soil quality has 11.0% greater than the average value of the best cryptomorphic shaft-valve type soil sampler. The sampling technology of the cryptomorphic shaft-valve type soil sampler takes soil samples of relatively highest quality in saturated soft clay, and the geotechnical parameters obtained after the test are relatively close to the physical and mechanical characteristics of the real stratum.
[1] 《工程地质手册》编委会. 工程地质手册[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2018.
[2] Molina-Gómez F, Ferreira C, Ramos C, et al. Performance of Gel-Push sampling in liquefiable soils[J]. Géotechnique Letters, 2020, 10: 1-6.
[3] Antónió V D F, Jubert P. Getting high-quality samples in ‘sensitive' soils for advanced laboratory tests[J]. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut, 2017, 2: 34.
[4] Mori K, Sakai K. The GP sampler: a new innovation in core sampling[M]. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Australian Geomechanics Society, 2016.
[5] Antónió V D F, Cristiana F, Cristiana R, et al. The geotechnical test site in the greater Lisbon area for liquefaction characterisation and sample quality control of cohesionless soils[J]. AIMS Geosci., 2019, 5(2): 325-343.
[6] 李龙起, 罗书学, 姜红, 等. 非饱和红黏土土水特性及强度特征研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2014, 49(3): 393-398, 431.
[7] 李高山, 潘永坚, 孟叙华. 不同取样方法下饱和软土物理力学性状对比试验分析[J]. 工程地质学报, 2019, 27(3): 550-558.
[8] 张荣堂, Tom L. 土样扰动对低塑性软粘土影响的试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2002, 21(增2): 2350-2355.
[9] 高大钊, 张少钦, 姜安龙, 等. 取样扰动对土的工程性质指标影响的试验研究[J]. 工程勘察, 2006, 34(3): 6-10.
[10] 王年香, 魏汝龙. 沿海软粘土取土质量的对比分析[J]. 工程地质学报, 1994, 2(2): 66-75.
[11] 黄国淼, 陈志波, 陈少峰, 等. 植物胶工艺取样技术在花岗岩风化土中的应用[J]. 实验室研究与探索, 2020, 39(9): 51-55.
[12] 陈明星. 海南某港口勘察取样中取土扰动若干影响因素分析研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2010.
[13] 吴跃东, Martin T S. 高质量连续取土技术研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2005, 26(增1): 275-278.
[14] 王浩杰. 钻探和试坑取样对黄土试验结果的影响[J]. 铁道勘察, 2018, 44(2): 44-48.
[15] 何平, 王卫东, 徐中华. 上海黏土压缩指数和回弹指数经验关系[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(10): 3773-3782.
[16] 马郧, 李松, 徐光黎, 等. 武汉某超深基坑软土抗剪强度指标选取及应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2014, 35(增2): 306-312, 318.
[17] 贾敏才, 赵舜, 张震. 侧向卸荷条件下结构性软黏土蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2020, 55(6): 1257-1263.
[18] 罗如平, 吴跃东, 刘坚, 等. 取土器贯入扰动变形规律透明土试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(增1): 64-68.
[19] 李静荣, 赵占仑, 曾令浓, 等. 花岗岩残积土抗剪强度指标取值影响的研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2020, 16(2): 484-492.
[20] 沈日庚, 项培林, 徐敏生. “隐形轴阀式”常规厚壁取土器的开发与应用[J]. 工程勘察, 2006, 34(增1): 48-52.
[21] 王子平, 王静艳. 隐形轴阀式取土器[P]. 中国专利: CN1206413C, 2005-06-15.
[22] 王子平, 王子英. 弓形单缝互压扣合式土样筒[P]. 中国专利: CN213632754U, 2021-07-06.