块石回填土区复合式TBM适应性与施工技术研究

王森剑; 王继文; 钟祖良; 周继虎; 段望龙

doi:10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.04.27

地下空间与工程学报 >

2025 , Vol. 21 >Issue 4: 1352 - 1362

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.04.27

设计、施工、监测

块石回填土区复合式TBM适应性与施工技术研究

王森剑 ,
王继文 ,
钟祖良 ,
周继虎 ,
段望龙

展开

1.中铁一局集团第四工程有限公司,重庆 400045;
2.重庆大学土木工程学院,重庆 400045;
3.库区环境地质灾害防治国家地方联合工程研究中心,重庆 400045

王森剑(1982—),男,河南荥阳人,高级工程师。主要从事地下工程建设管理工作。E-mail:190047578@qq.com

王继文(1995—),男,贵州遵义人,博士生,主要从事隧道与地下工程领域的研究工作。E-mail:wang_jw@whu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2024-08-15

网络出版日期: 2025-09-03

收起

Study on Adaptability and Construction Technology of Compound TBM in Soil-Rock Mixture Backfill Area

Wang Senjian ,
Wang Jiwen ,
Zhong Zuliang ,
Zhou Jihu ,
Duan Wanglong

Expand

1. China Railway First Bureau Group Fourth Engineering Co., Ltd., Chongqing 400045, P.R. China;
2. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, P.R. China;
3. National Joint Engineering Research Center of Geohazards Prevention in the Reservoir Areas, Chongqing 400045, P.R. China

Received date: 2024-08-15

Online published: 2025-09-03

Fold

摘要

重庆4号线王家城站—生基堡站区间需穿越3段新近块石回填土地层,由于新近块石回填土地层结构松散、均匀性差、空隙大、欠固结以及抗剪强度低,隧道施工易引起较大地表沉降。本文对回填土区复合式TBM的适用性和施工技术进行了总结。结果表明:通过地表袖阀管注浆预加固(压力0.1~0.3 MPa),提升土体强度(无侧限抗压强度≥1.2 MPa)与密实度(剪切波速≥300 m/s);掘进中采用"小贯入度+高转速"模式(速度≤30 mm/min,转速0.8~1.0 r/min),严格控制出土量(72.46 m³/环)与同步注浆量(6.66~11.1 m³/环);对大粒径孤石实施液压分裂破碎(≤300 mm)。数值分析揭示填土深度与注浆范围为块石回填土区地表沉降主控因素,建议地表预注浆加固范围扩大至拱腰两侧1.0D。实测表明,该技术将地表沉降控制在24 mm(低于预警值30 mm),隧道拱顶沉降与净空收敛小于设计限值。

关键词： 隧道工程; 复合式TBM; 块石回填土; 施工技术

本文引用格式

王森剑 , 王继文 , 钟祖良 , 周继虎 , 段望龙 . 块石回填土区复合式TBM适应性与施工技术研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2025 , 21(4) : 1352 -1362 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.04.27

Abstract

The section between Wangjiacheng Station and Shengjipu Station of Chongqing Line 4 needs to pass through 3 sections of newly filled soil-rock mixture. Due to the loose structure, poor uniformity, large voids, insufficient consolidation and low shear strength of the newly filled soil-rock mixture, tunnel construction is prone to cause significant ground settlement. The applicability and construction technology of compound TBM in soil-rock mixture backfill area are summarized in this paper. The results show that: Pre-reinforcement via surface sleeve-valve grouting (pressure: 0.1~0.3 MPa) enhances soil strength (unconfined compressive strength ≥1.2 MPa) and density (shear wave velocity ≥300 m/s); “Low penetration + high rotation” mode (advance rate ≤30 mm/min, cutterhead rotation 0.8~1.0 r/min) with strict control of muck discharge (72.46 m³/ring) and synchronous grouting volume (6.66~11.1 m³/ring) is adopted; Large boulders (≤300 mm) are fragmented by hydraulic splitting. Numerical analysis identified backfill depth and grouting range as dominant settlement factors and the area for surface pre-grouting reinforcement is suggested to expand to the sides of the arch rib by 1.0D. The measurement results show that this technology has controlled the surface subsidence to 24 mm (below the warning value of 30 mm), and the subsidence of the tunnel arch top and the net clearance convergence are below the design limits.

Key words： tunnel engineering; compound TBM; soil-rock mixture backfill; construction technology

参考文献

[1] 《工程地质手册》编委会. 工程地质手册[M]. 北京: 中国建筑工业出版社, 2007. (Editorial Board of Engineering Geology Handbook. Engineering geology handbook[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2007. (in Chinese))
[2]何晓勇, 宋鉴学, 刘新荣, 等. 回填土隧道施工方案对比研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2016, 12(增1): 205-212. (He Xiaoyong, Song Jianxue, Liu Xinrong, et al. Contrast research of excavation scheme in backfill soil tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2016, 12(Supp.1): 205-212. (in Chinese))
[3]罗祺月. 山地城市土石混合体回填区隧道开挖稳定性及其影响因素研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2019. (Luo Qiyue. Study on tunnel excavation stability and its influencing factors in backfill area of soil-rock mixture in mountains city[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2019. (in Chinese))
[4]冯俭华, 徐坚, 张明书, 等. 暴雨对块石回填土隧道稳定性的影响研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2018, 14(增1): 109-116. (Feng Jianhua, Xu Jian, Zhang Mingshu, et al. Study on the influence of heavy rain on the stability of soil-rock mixtures backfill tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2018, 14(Supp.1): 109-116. (in Chinese))
[5]Jin X, Hou C, Li Y, et al. Cause identification of damage in tunnel constructed in soil-rock mixture site and effect of suggested reinforcement measures[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2021, 14(11): 1-13.
[6]《中国公路学报》编辑部. 中国交通隧道工程学术研究综述·2022[J]. 中国公路学报, 2022, 35(4): 1-40. (Editorial Department of China Journal of Highway and Transport. Review on China’s traffic tunnel engineering research: 2022[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(4): 1-40. (in Chinese))
[7]钱七虎, 胡小强, 李树忱, 等. 中国盾构隧道工程关键技术的新进展综述[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2024, 44(5): 897. (Qian Qihu, Hu Xiaoqiang, Li Shuchen, et al. Recent advances in key technologies of shield tunnel engineering in China[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2024, 44(5): 897. (in Chinese))
[8]彭辉, 邹光炯, 陈柏全, 等. 复合式TBM在重庆地铁工程中的应用[J]. 都市快轨交通, 2017, 30(1): 70-76. (Peng Hui, Zou Guangjiong, Chen Baiquan, et al. Application of compound tbm to chongqing metro projects[J]. Urban Rapid Rail Transit, 2017, 30(1): 70-76. (in Chinese))
[9]陈凡, 何川, 黄钟晖, 等. 地铁区间隧道多模式掘进设备选型适应性研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022, 59(3): 53-62. (Chen Fan, He Chuan, Huang Zhonghui, et al. Study on the adaptability and selection of multi-mode tunnelling equipment for subway tunnels[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2022, 59(3): 53-62. (in Chinese))
[10]谢文达, 梁红兵, 陈乔松, 等. 三模式掘进机全断面岩层段TBM模式施工技术研究[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2024, 44(3): 596-604. (Xie Wenda, Liang Hongbing, Chen Qiaosong, et al. Tunneling technology of three-mode tunnel boring machine under TBM mode in full-section hard rock[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2024, 44(3): 596-604. (in Chinese))
[11]宋天田, 刘川昆, 陈凡, 等. 地铁区间隧道盾构/TBM双模选型适应性研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2022, 39(1): 107-113. (Song Tiantian, Liu Chuankun, Chen Fan, et al. Research on the selection and tunneling adaptability of dual-mode shield/TBM in metro tunnel[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2022, 39(1): 107-113. (in Chinese))
[12]Wu F, Gong Q, Li Z, et al. Study on tunnelling performance of dual-mode shield TBM by cutterhead working performance and tunnelling difference comparison: a case in Shenzhen Metro Line 12[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2023, 56(7): 5315-5333.
[13]Yang T H, Wen T, Huang X, et al. Predicting model of dual-mode shield tunneling parameters in complex ground using recurrent neural networks and multiple optimization algorithms[J]. Applied Sciences, 2024, 14(2): 581.
[14]熊卫士, 张康健, 王曙光, 等. 山城岩质地层条件下复合式TBM刀盘边缘滚刀安装倾角研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2022, 19(6): 1774-1785. (Xiong Weishi, Zhang Kangjian, Wang Shuguang,et al. Research on installation inclination of gage cutter of the compound TBM cutterhead based on Chongqing rock formation[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2022, 19(6): 1774-1785. (in Chinese))
[15]何川, 黄兴, 陈凡, 等. EPB/TBM双模盾构复合地层掘进参数及适应性研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2023, 40(3): 96-103. (He Chuan, Huang Xing, Chen Fan,et al. Research on the tunneling parameters and adaptability of EPB/TBM dual mode shield in composite strata[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2023, 40(3): 96-103. (in Chinese))
[16]罗文帮, 黄锋, 张正雨, 等. 块石回填土地铁隧道TBM掘进速度的GA-BPNN预测模型[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021, 58(增1): 426-431. (Luo Wenbang, Huang Feng, Zhang Zhengyu, et al. GA-BPNN prediction model for TBM advance speed in metro tunnelling in backfills with rock blocks[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology, 2021, 58(Supp.1): 426-431. (in Chinese))
[17]汪来, 王树英, 潘秋景, 等. 基于AM-BiLSTM模型的块石回填土区盾构姿态预测研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2023, 20(8): 2948-2960. (Wang Lai, Wang Shuying, Pan Qiujing, et al. Research of prediction of shield attitude passing the soil-rock mixture backfill area based on the AM-BiLSTM[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2023, 20(8): 2948-2960. (in Chinese))
[18]邹鸿. 土石混合体回填土注浆扩散加固机理及效果评价研究[D]. 重庆: 重庆大学, 2022. (Zou Hong. Study on grouting diffusion reinforcement mechanism and effect evaluation of soil-rock mixture backfill[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2022. (in Chinese))
[19]Xu W J, Hu R L, Tan R J .Some geomechanical properties of soil-rock mixtures in the Hutiao Gorge area, China[J]. Géotechnique, 2007, 57(7): 255-264.
[20]Meng Q X, Wang H L, Xu W Y,et al. A numerical homogenization study of the elastic property ofa soil-rock mixture using random mesostructure generation[J].Computers and Geotechnics, 2018, 98: 48-57.
[21]Zheng Z, Li S, Liu R. Analysis on Structural Characteristics of Grout and Rock Distribution in Complex Geological Mixtures after Grouting Reinforcement and Its Mechanical Strength[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2021, 54: 3757-3782.
[22]张莎莎, 戴志仁, 白云. 盾构隧道同步注浆浆液压力消散规律研究[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2012, 33(3): 40-48. (Zhang Shasha, Dai Zhiren, Bai Yun. Research on the dissipation law of grout pressure during the simulation grouting of shield tunnel[J]. China Railway Science, 2012, 33(3): 40-48. (in Chinese))
[23]余良滨. 某大直径盾构盾尾同步注浆引起的渗流场变化及地层变形研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2018. (Yu Liangbin. Study on the seepage field variation and soil deformation caused by synchronous grouting of large diameter shield machine during the construction of a tunnel[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2018. (in Chinese))
[24]梁禹, 阳军生, 王树英, 等. 考虑时变性影响的盾构壁后注浆浆液固结及消散机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(12): 3373-3380. (Liang Yu, Yang Junsheng, Wang Shuying, et al. A study on grout consolidation and dissipation mechanism during shield backfilled grouting with considering time effect[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(12): 3373-3380. (in Chinese))
[25]曹洋, 林向荣, 李子路. 软土地层浅埋盾构施工的精细化数值模拟[J]. 工程科学与技术, 2022, 54(3): 149-158. (Cao Yang, Lin Xiangrong, Li Zilu. Refined numerical simulation of shallow shield construction in soft soil stratum[J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences, 2022, 54(3): 149-158. (in Chinese))

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献