理论与试验研究

考虑主应力旋转的倾斜挡墙地震主动土压力研究

  • 张晋伟 ,
  • 周亦涛
展开
  • 1.四川文理学院 建筑工程学院,四川 达州 635000;
    2.重庆交通大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400074
张晋伟(1979—),男,四川达州人,博士,教授,主要从事城市及地下空间设计、岩土工程等领域的教学与科研工作。E-mail:28243722@qq.com

收稿日期: 2024-10-12

  网络出版日期: 2025-09-03

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(51378520)

Research on Seismic Active Earth Pressure of Inclined Rigid Retaining Wall Considering Principal Stress Rotation

  • Zhang Jinwei ,
  • Zhou Yitao
Expand
  • 1. School of Architecture and Engineering, Sichuan University of Arts and Science, Dazhou, Sichuan 635000,P.R. China;
    2. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, P.R. China

Received date: 2024-10-12

  Online published: 2025-09-03

摘要

考虑到主应力旋转、时间效应和墙背倾角的影响,根据滑动土体的总力平衡,采用拟动力方法推导出了地震主动破裂角的新解。通过水平微分层方法,得到了倾斜刚性挡土墙在平移下的法向地震主动土压力及其系数的新微分方程。然后,利用常微分方程的龙格-库塔法获得数值解,讨论了参数(即振动周期时间、墙背倾角、回填土内摩擦角、墙土摩擦角、墙体高度、水平和垂直地震加速度系数的振幅)对地震主动破裂角、地震主动土压力及其系数的影响。此外,采用本文方法的计算值与现有的拟静力和拟动力法,将地震主动土压力及其系数进行了比较,结果表明:地震主动破裂角、地震主动土压力及其系数均随时间呈周期性变化,地震主动土压力沿墙高呈非线性分布,本文方法得到的地震主动土压力及其系数大于现有拟静力方法得到的值。

本文引用格式

张晋伟 , 周亦涛 . 考虑主应力旋转的倾斜挡墙地震主动土压力研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2025 , 21(4) : 1146 -1154 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.04.05

Abstract

Considering the influence of principal stress rotation, time effect and wall back inclination, a new solution of seismic active failure angle is derived by using pseudo-dynamic method according to the total force balance of sliding soil. Through the horizontal differential layer method, a new differential equation of the normal seismic active earth pressure and its coefficient of the inclined rigid retaining wall under translation is obtained. Then, the Runge-Kutta method of ordinary differential equation is used to obtain the numerical solution, and the influence of parameters (i.e. vibration cycle time, wall back inclination, internal friction angle of backfill, wall soil friction angle, wall height, the amplitude of horizontal and vertical seismic acceleration coefficient) on the seismic active failure angle, as well as the seismic active earth pressure and its coefficient are discussed. In addition, the seismic active earth pressure and its coefficients calculated by the proposed method are compared with the existing pseudo-static and pseudo-dynamic methods. The results show that: The seismic active failure angle, the seismic active earth pressure and its coefficient change periodically with time, and the seismic active earth pressure distribution along the wall height is nonlinear. The seismic active earth pressure and its coefficient obtained by this method are larger than those obtained by the existing quasi-static method.

参考文献

[1] Mononobe N, Matsuo H. On the determination of earthquake pressure during earthquakes[A]//World Engineering Congress[C]. 1929: 177-185.
[2]Okabe S. General theory on earth pressure and seismic stability of retaining wall and dam[J]. Journal of the Japanese Society of Civil Engineers, 1924, 10(5): 1277-1323.
[3]Richards R, Huang C. Seismic earth pressure on retaining structures[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,1999, 125 (9):771-778.
[4]Mylonakis G, Kloukinas P, Papantonopoulos C.An alternative to the Mononobe-Okabe equations for seismic earth pressures[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2007, 27(10):957-969.
[5]Choudhury D, Singh S. New approach for estimation of static and seismic active earth pressure[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2006, 24(1):117-127.
[6]Caltabiano S,Cascone E,Maugeri M. Static and seismic limit equilibrium analysis of sliding retaining walls under different surcharge conditions[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2012, 37(2):38-55.
[7]Iskander M, Chen Z, Omidvar M, et al. Rankine pseudo-static earth pressure for c-φ soils[J]. Mechanics Research Communications, 2013, 51(3): 51-55.
[8]Iskander M, Omidvar M, Elsherif O. Conjugate stress approach for Rankine seismic active earth pressure in cohesionless soils[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2013, 139(7):1205-1210.
[9]宋征,张书华,严学清.挡墙地震主动土压力计算及其影响因素分析[J].水电能源科学, 2018, 36(10):113-116.(Song Zheng,Zhang Shuhua,Yan Xueqing. Calculation of seimic active earth pressure of retaining wall and its infuluencing factors analysis [J]. Water Resource and Power, 2018, 36(10): 113-116.(in Chinese))
[10]Biondi G,Cascone E, Maugeri M.Displacement versus pseudo-static evaluation of the seismic performance of sliding retainingwalls[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering,2014, 12(3): 1239-1267.
[11]周勇,都浩男,王正振.考虑墙背倾角的挡土墙地震主动土压力研究[J].兰州理工大学学报, 2023, 49(2):110-116.(Zhou Yong, Du Hannan, Wang Zhengzhen. Research on earthquake active earth pressure of inclined retaining wall [J]. Journal of Lanzhou University of Technology, 2023, 49 (2):110-116.(in Chinese))
[12]侯键, 夏唐代, 陈炜昀, 等.考虑土拱效应的挡土墙地震主动土压力静力研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2013, 32(增1): 2825-2832. (Hou Jian,Xia Tangdai,Chen Weijun. Static study of seismic active earth pressure on retaining walls considering soil arching effect [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32 (Supp.1):2825-2832.(in Chinese))
[13]周亦涛,陈福全. 考虑土拱效应的非垂直挡墙地震主动土压力[J].岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34 (7):1452-1461.(Zhou Yitao,Chen Fuquan. Seismic active earth pressure for nonvertical rigid retaining wall considering soil arching effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34 (7):1452-1461.(in Chinese))
[14]江文放,周亦涛,俞缙,等. 基于土拱效应的墙背非极限主动土压力[J].地下空间与工程学报, 2016, 12 (6): 1676-1681.(Jiang Wenfang, Zhou Yitao,Yu Jin, et al. Non-limit active earth pressure for rigid retaining wall based on soil arching effect[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2016, 12 (6): 1676-1681(in Chinese))
[15]黄睿,任城,汤金焕.考虑土拱效应的黏性土地震主动土压力[J].绍兴文理学院学报, 2018, 38(8):15-21.(Huang Rui,Ren Cheng,Tang Jinhuan. Seismic active earth pressure of claywith soil arching effects considered [J]. Journal of Shanxing University, 2018, 38 (8):15-21.(in Chinese))
[16]Paik K H, Salgado R, Rocchi G,et al. Estimation of active earth pressure against rigid retaining walls considering arching effects[J].Géotechnique,2003, 53(7): 643-653.
[17]Zeng Z Q, Wu S Z, Lyu C. Upper bound solution to seismic active earth pressure of submerged backfill subjected to partial drainage[J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2021, 15(6): 1480-1493.
[18]Choudhury D, Katdare A D, Pain A.New method to compute seismic active earth pressure on retaining wall considering seismic waves[J]. Geotechnical And Geological Engineering, 2014, 32(2): 391-402.
[19]Choudhury D, Nimbalkar S S. Pseudo-dynamic approach of seismic active earth pressure behind retaining wall[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2006, 24(1):1103-1113.
[20]Ghosh P. Seismic active earth pressure behind a non-vertical retaining wall using pseudo-dynamic analysis[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2008, 45(1): 117-123.
[21]Ghosh S. Pseudo-dynamic active force and pressure behind battered retaining wall supporting inclined backfill[J].Soil Dynamics & Earthquake Engineering, 2010,30(11): 1226-1232.
[22]Ghosh P. Seismicpassive earth pressure behind non-vertical retaining wall using pseudo-dynamic analysis[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering,2007,25(6):693-703.
[23]张晓曦,彭涛,柯灵,等.考虑第二破裂面的折线墙背挡土墙的地震主动土压力[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版), 2023,59(4):562-568.(Zhang Xiaoxi,Peng Tao,Ke Ling,et al. Seismic active earth pressure on retaining walls with a broken-line back surface by considering the second failure surface of backfill [J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 2023, 59 (4):562-568.(in Chinese))
文章导航

/