防灾与环境

隧道近距离下穿采空区稳定性分析及支护优化

  • 申慧涛
展开
  • 中铁十二局集团有限公司,太原 030024
申慧涛(1984—),男,陕西榆林人,主要从事桥梁与隧道施工及技术管理工作。E-mail:278982867@qq.com

收稿日期: 2024-08-30

  网络出版日期: 2025-06-13

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(52174106)

Stability Analysis and Support Optimization of A Tunnel Penetrating Through Mining Area in Close Proximity

  • Shen Huitao
Expand
  • China Railway 12th Bureau Group Co., Ltd., Taiyuan 030024, P.R. China

Received date: 2024-08-30

  Online published: 2025-06-13

摘要

隧道近距离下穿采空区是地下工程施工过程中要面对的重大技术难题。以成自高铁白云山隧道为工程背景,通过FLAC3D分析无水与含水两种采空区状况下隧道稳定性,优化原有的加固方案。结果表明:不同工况未注浆的隧道开挖施工后,采空区左端均呈现应力集中,隧道上方塑性区范围较大,破坏较严重,拱底竖直位移超出相关规范控制值,隧道施工存在安全隐患;采空区无水工况下,当采空区与隧道距离小于4.5 m时进行140°半包围注浆,采空区距离隧道4.5~9 m时进行全包围注浆,采空区与隧道相距超过9 m时不注浆,加固方案可以满足安全要求;采空区含水工况下,围岩遇水软化,破损程度加剧,隧道拱顶孔隙水压较大,存在涌水风险,全包围注浆范围需扩大为采空区与隧道相距4.5~10 m处,其他隧道段支护形式与采空区无水工况下相同即可;现场监测结果显示隧道稳定性得到了保障。

本文引用格式

申慧涛 . 隧道近距离下穿采空区稳定性分析及支护优化[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2025 , 21(3) : 1094 -1104 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.03.39

Abstract

Excavating tunnels within the influence range of goaf area poses significant technical challenges commonly encountered in underground construction projects. Considering the Baiyunshan Tunnel as the project backdrop, FLAC3D was utilized to analyze the stability of the tunnel under conditions that if the goaf area was filled with water or not. Then optimize the original support plan to suit different conditions. The results show that: Excavating the tunnel without grouting in diverse engineering conditions presented significant safety hazards. Stress concentration occurred at the left end of the goaf, resulting in a wide range of plastic zone above the tunnel and extensive damage to the tunnel. The vertical displacement of the tunnel floor was expected to surpass the prescribed control value that outlined in the pertinent guidelines. The presence of water in the goaf exacerbated the rock softening and damage. High pore water pressure posed a significant risk of water inflow into the tunnel's crown. For the tunnel that underpassed dry goaf area, grouting was carried out within a range of 140° when the distance between the goaf and the tunnel was less than 4.5 meters. Grouting was applied to the entire surrounding area when the distance between the goaf and the tunnel was within the range of 4.5~9 meters. If the distance exceeded 9 meters, grouting was not required to meet safety regulations. During the construction of the tunnel underpassing water-bearing goaf area, it was necessary to extend the grouting range to cover a distance of 4.5~10 meters from the goaf to the tunnel. Other parts of the tunnel could be supported in the same way as the tunnel that underpassed dry goaf area. The field monitoring results indicated that the stability of the tunnel had been ensured.

参考文献

[1] 李建旺. 上伏采空区高速公路隧道开挖灾变演化机制及安全控制关键技术研究[D]. 北京:北京科技大学, 2021.(Li Jianwang. Research on the catastrophic evolution mechanism and safety control key technology of highway tunnel excavation with upper goaf[D]. Beijing: University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2021. (in Chinese))
[2] 童立元, 刘松玉, 邱钰, 等. 高速公路下伏采空区问题国内外研究现状及进展[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004(7): 1198-1202. (Tong Liyuan, Liu Songyu, Qiu Yu, et al. Current research state of problems associated with mined-out regions under expressway and future development[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004(7): 1198-1202. (in Chinese))
[3] 郭晓亮, 高乐. FLAC 3D在越岭隧道涌水分析中的应用[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2015, 32(8): 76-80. (Guo Xiaoliang, Gao Le. Application of Flac 3D in water gushing analysis of watershed tunnel[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2015, 32(8): 76-80. (in Chinese))
[4] Vazaios I, Vlachopoulos N, Diederichs M S. Mechanical analysis and interpretation of excavation damage zone formation around deep tunnels within massive rock masses using hybrid finite-discrete element approach: case of Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) Underground Research Laboratory (URL) test tunnel[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2019, 56(1): 35-59.
[5] 余小辉, 傅鹤林, 黄戈等. 破碎围岩中隧道注浆层厚度确定[J]. 矿业研究与开发, 2022, 42(2): 119-123. (Yu Xiaohui, Fu Helin, Huang Ge, et al. The determination of grouting thickness of tunnel in broken surrounding rock[J]. Mining Research and Development, 2022, 42(2): 119-123. (in Chinese))
[6] 马春景, 姜谙男, 江宗斌, 等. 基于单元状态指标的盾构隧道水-力耦合模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(6): 1762-1770. (Ma Chunjing, Jiang Annan, Jiang Zongbin, et al. Hydro-mechanical coupled simulation and analysis of shield tunnel construction based on the zone state index[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(6): 1762-1770. (in Chinese))
[7] Fang Y, Yao Z, Walton G, et al. Liner behavior of a tunnel constructed below a caved zone[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2018, 22: 4163-4172.
[8] Huang F, Shi X, Wu C, et al. Stability analysis of tunnel under coal seam goaf: Numerical and physical modeling[J]. Underground Space, 2023, 11: 246-261.
[9] 李杨杨, 朱慧聪, 张士川, 等. 隧道开挖卸荷效应诱发断层活化突水数值模拟研究[J]. 矿业研究与开发, 2023, 43(3): 154-159. (Li Yangyang, Zhu Huicong, Zhang Shichuan, et al. Numerical simulation of fault activation water inrush induced by tunnel excavation unloading effect[J]. Mining Research and Development, 2023, 43(3): 154-159. (in Chinese))
[10] 饶永进. 中梁山新建隧道对近接既有隧道渗流场影响研究[D]. 重庆:重庆交通大学, 2016. (Rao Yongjin. Study on the seepage field of Zhong Liangshan Tunnel with the nearby of new tunnel[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2016. (in Chinese))
[11] 师雯琦, 杨双锁, 牛少卿, 等. 渗透压力和孔隙度对隧道围岩变形的影响研究[J]. 矿业研究与开发, 2021, 41(3): 91-97. (Shi Wenqi, Yang Shuangsuo, Niu Shaoqing, et al. Research on the influence of seepage pressure and porosity on tunnel surrounding rock deformation[J]. Mining Research and Development, 2021, 41(3): 91-97. (in Chinese))
[12] Chen H X, Qi C Z, Wang S, et al. A simple gradient model for zonal disintegration of the surrounding rock around a deep circular tunnel[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 91: 103006.
[13] Tao M, Hong Z X, Peng K, et al. Evaluation of excavation-damaged zone around underground tunnels by theoretical calculation and field test methods[J]. Energies, 2019, 12(9): 1682.
[14] 樊帆, 刘臣毅, 徐建生. 煤矿地下水库人工坝体稳定性分析[J]. 煤炭工程, 2020, 52(11): 120-125. (Fan Fan, Liu Chenyi, Xu Jiansheng. Stability analysis of artificial dam body in coal mine groundwater reservoir[J]. Coal Engineering, 2020, 52(11): 120-125. (in Chinese))
[15] 樊祥君, 方传海, 王星星, 等. 公路隧道拱顶沉降数据采集及监测精度确定方法探讨[J]. 公路交通技术, 2022, 38(6): 108-115. (Fan Xiangjun, Fang Chuanhai, Wang Xingxing, et al. Discussion on the vault settlement data acquisition method and determination method of monitoring accuracy of highway tunnel[J]. Technology of Highway and Transport, 2022, 38(6): 2022, 38(6): 108-115. (in Chinese))
[16] 白阳阳. 盾构下穿高铁路基沉降控制标准及控制措施分析[J]. 都市快轨交通, 2022, 35(3): 109-116. (Bai Yangyang. Settlement control standard and control measures for shield tunneling under a high-speed railway subgrade[J]. Urban Rapid Rail Transit, 2022, 35(3): 109-116. (in Chinese))
[17] 张鹏. 地铁隧道下穿高速铁路地表沉降控制标准研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2014, 10(增1): 1700-1703. (Zhang Peng. Study on the surface settlement control standard of metro tunnel under the high-speed railway[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2014, 10(Supp.1): 1700-1703. (in Chinese))
[18] 任文峰. 高水压隧道应力场—位移场—渗流场耦合理论及注浆防水研究[D]. 长沙:中南大学, 2013. (Ren Wenfeng. Theory research of stress field displacement field and seepage field and study on grouting waterproofing of high water pressure tunnel[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2013. (in Chinese))
[19] 刘琦, 卢耀如, 李晓昭. 孔隙水压力对岩石力学参数的影响[J]. 地球学报, 2008(5): 660-664. (Liu Qi, Lu Yaoru, Li Xiaozhao. The effect of the pore water pressure on the rock mechanics parameters[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2008(5): 660-664. (in Chinese))
[20] 段宏飞, 姜振泉, 朱术云, 等. 深部矿井岩石水稳性微观机理及强度软化特性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(9): 1636-1645. (Duan Hongfei, Jiang Zhenquan, Zhu Shuyun, et al. Micro-mechanism of water stability and characteristics of strength softening of rock in deep mines[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(9): 1636-1645. (in Chinese))
[21] 赵立财.饱水砂岩力学性质软化试验研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2022,18(1): 154-162.(Zhao Licai.Experimental study on mechanical property softening of water saturated sandstone[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2022,18(1): 154-162.(in Chinese))
[22] 幸新涪,周火明,卢阳,等.泥岩力学参数遇水软化特性试验研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报,2016,12(增2): 498-503.(Xing Xinfu,Zhou Huoming,Lu Yang,et al.Experimental study of mechanical properties of mudstone considering effect of water[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2016,12(Supp.2): 498-503.(in Chinese))
[23] 冯文昌, 王共元, 杨斯杰, 等. 长期水作用下岩石软化系数的测定[J]. 煤炭技术, 2020, 39(1): 23-25. (Feng Wenchang, Wang Gongyuan, Yang Sijie, et al. Mensuration of rocks' softening coefficients under long-term water influence[J]. Coal Technology, 2020, 39(1): 23-25. (in Chinese))
[24] 陈伟乐, 徐国平, 宋神友, 等. 风化岩遇水软化的强度试验及力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(增1): 67-76. (Chen Weile, Xu Guoping, Song Shenyou, et al. Strength test and mechanical characteristics of weathered rock softened by water[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022, 43(Supp.1): 67-76. (in Chinese))
文章导航

/