理论与试验研究

动态法向应力振幅对散体材料摩擦特性影响研究

  • 党文刚 ,
  • 郑俊滔 ,
  • 陈俊鹏
展开
  • 1.隧道工程灾变防控与智能建养全国重点实验室,广东 珠海 519000;
    2.中山大学 土木工程学院,广东 珠海 519000
党文刚(1987—),男,广东珠海人,博士,副教授,主要从事地下空间、地热开采岩石节理面动态剪切、剪切–渗流等方面研究。E-mail: dangwg@mail.sysu.edu.cn
郑俊滔(2000—),男,广东佛山人,硕士生,主要从事散体材料直剪、岩石剪切渗流研究。E-mail: zhengjt6@mail2.sysu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2024-08-26

  网络出版日期: 2025-05-06

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(52474122);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金海上风电联合基金(2022A1515240009)

Influence Study of Dynamic Normal Stress Amplitude on Frictional Characteristics of Granular Materials

  • Dang Wengang ,
  • Zheng Juntao ,
  • Chen Junpeng
Expand
  • 1. National Key Laboratory for Disaster Prevention and Intelligent Maintenance of Tunnel Engineering, Zhuhai, Guangdong 519000, P.R. China;
    2. School of Civil Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai, Guangdong 519000, P.R. China

Received date: 2024-08-26

  Online published: 2025-05-06

摘要

散体颗粒材料被广泛应用于基础设施工程建设中。为了深入研究动态法向应力振幅对散体材料剪切滑移特性的影响,本文以标准干砂为研究对象,采用大型动态直剪试验机对标准砂进行变法向应力剪切试验。结果表明:(1)剪切应力、摩擦系数以及法向位移均伴随着法向力的改变呈周期性变化;(2) 随动态法向应力振幅的增大,稳定滑移阶段剪切应力的峰值和谷值均先增大后减小,最大峰值剪切应力大于静态法向应力下峰值剪切应力;(3)剪切应力峰值与法向应力峰值间存在一个明显的相位差,该相位差随着剪切变形的增大而减小,随着动态法向应力振幅的增大而增大,然而剪切应力谷值与法向应力谷值间却不存在相位差;(4)动态法向应力下的法向位移随振幅的增大而增大,且远大于恒定法向应力下的法向位移。研究可为实际工程中动力荷载条件下下砂土强度参数的确定提供参考。

本文引用格式

党文刚 , 郑俊滔 , 陈俊鹏 . 动态法向应力振幅对散体材料摩擦特性影响研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2025 , 21(2) : 461 -471 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.02.12

Abstract

As a typical granular material, sand is widely used in infrastructure construction. In order to study the influence of dynamic normal stress amplitude on the frictional characteristic of granular material, a large dynamic shear box device is used to perform the dynamic shear test on standard sand. Experimental results show that: (1) The changing pattern of shear stress, friction coefficient and normal displacement under dynamic normal stresses show variation characteristics. (2) In the stable sliding stage, the peak and valley values of shear stress increase first and then decrease with increasing normal stress amplitude, and the maximum peak shear stress is larger than that under constant normal stress. (3) There is an obvious phase shift between the peak normal stress and peak shear stress, which decreases with increasing shear displacement and increases with increasing dynamic normal stress amplitude. However, there is no phase shift between the valley normal stress and shear stress. (4) The normal displacement under dynamic normal stress increases with increasing dynamic normal stress amplitude, and it is much larger than that under constant normal stress. The study can provide a reference for determining the strength parameters of sand under dynamic load conditions in practical engineering.

参考文献

[1] Idriss I M, Boulanger R W. Soil liquefaction during earthquakes[J]. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 2008, 136(6), 755.
[2] Andersen K H. Cyclic soil parameters for offshore foundation design[A]// 3th International Symposium on Frontiers in Offshore Geoterhrics[C]. 2015: 5-82.
[3] Kou B, Cao Y, Li J, et al. Granular materials flow like complex fluids[J]. Nature, 2017, 551(7680): 360-363.
[4] 陈国兴, 吴琪, 孙苏豫, 等. 土壤地震液化评价方法研究进展[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2020, 41(4): 1-32. (Chen Guoxing, Wu Qi, Sun Suyu, et al. Research progress on soil seismic liquefaction evaluation methods [J] Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2020, 41(4): 1-32. (In Chinese))
[5] Taslagyan K A, Chan D H, Morgenstern N R. Effect of vibration on the critical state of dry granular soils[J]. Granular Matter, 2015, 17: 687-702.
[6] Barkan D D. Dynamics of basis and foundations[M]. McGraw-Hill, 1962.
[7] Makkar F M,Chandrakaran S, Sankar N. Experimental investigation of response of different granular soil-3D geogrid interfaces using large-scale direct shear tests[J]. Journal of materials in civil engineering, 2019, 31(4): 04019012.
[8] 周杰, 周国庆, 赵光思, 等. 高应力下剪切速率对砂土抗剪强度影响研究[J].岩土力学,2010,31(9): 2805-2810. (Zhou Jie, Zhou Guoqing, Zhao Guangsi, et al. Analysis of influence of shear rate on shear strength of sand under high stress[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics 2010, 31 (9): 2805-2810. (In Chinese))
[9] Denies N, Holeyman A. Shear strength degradation of vibrated dry sand[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 2017, 95: 106-117.
[10] Kolmayer R. Contribution àl'étude du compactage par vibration des matériaux pulvérulents[D]. Université de Grenoble, 1970.
[11] Dieterich J H. Nucleation and triggering of earthquake slip: effect of periodic stresses[J]. Tectonophysics, 1987, 144(1-3): 127-139.
[12] Boettcher M S, Marone C. Effects of normal stress variation on the strength and stability of creeping faults[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2004, 109(B3): B03406.
[13] Dang W,Konietzky H, Frühwirt T. Direct shear behavior of planar joints under cyclic normal load conditions: effect of different cyclic normal force amplitudes[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2017, 50(11): 3101-3107.
[14] Dang W,Konietzky H, Frühwirt T, et al. Cyclic frictional responses of planar joints under cyclic normal load conditions: Laboratory tests and numerical simulations[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2020, 53(1): 337-364.
[15] Dang W,Konietzky H, Chang L, et al. Velocity-frequency-amplitude-dependent frictional resistance of planar joints under dynamic normal load (DNL) conditions[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 79: 27-34.
[16] 姜耀东, 王涛, 赵毅鑫, 等. 采动影响下断层活化规律的数值模拟研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,2013, 42(1): 1-5. (Jiang Yaodong, Wang Tao, Zhao Yixin, et al. Numerical simulation of fault activation pattern induced by coal extraction[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2013, 42 (1): 1-5. (In Chinese))
[17] Labuz J F, Theroux B. Laboratory calibration of earth pressure cells[J]. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2005, 28(2): 188-196.
[18] 庄丽, 周顺华. 砂的静力加卸载试验和应力释放模型研究[J].岩土力学,2009,30(9):2667-2673. (Zhuang Li, Zhou Shunhua. Static loading-unloading test of sand and stress release model[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2009, 30(9):2667-2673. (In Chinese))
[19] Linker M F, Dieterich J H. Effects of variable normal stress on rock friction: observations and constitutive equations[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1992, 97(B4): 4923-4940.
[20] Perfettini H, Schmittbuhl J, Rice J R, et al. Frictional response induced by time-dependent fluctuations of the normal loading[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2001, 106(B7): 13455-13472.
[21] Cochard A, Rice J R. Fault rupture between dissimilar materials: ill-posedness, regularization, and slip-pulse response[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 2000, 105(B11): 25891-25907.
[22] Hong T, Marone C. Effects of normal stress perturbations on thefrictional properties of simulated faults[J]. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 2005, 6(3): Q03012.
[23] Dieterich J H. Modeling of rock friction:1. Experimental results and constitutive equations[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1979, 84: 2161-2168.
[24] Ruina A. Slip instability and state variable friction laws[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1983, 88(B12): 10359-10370.
[25] Marone C. Laboratory-derived friction laws and their application to seismic faulting[J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 1998, 26: 643-696.
[26] Press W H, Flannery B P,Teukolsky S A, et al. Integration of ordinary differential equations, in Numerical Recipes in C[J]. The Art of Scientific Computing, 1992, 2: 701-744.
文章导航

/