设计、施工、监测

液化场地大直径变截面单桩群桩动力响应差异

  • 冯忠居 ,
  • 周世昊 ,
  • 张聪 ,
  • 宋健 ,
  • 林立华
展开
  • 1.长安大学 公路学院, 西安 710064;
    2.厦门路桥工程投资发展有限公司, 福建 厦门 361000
冯忠居(1965—),男,山西万荣人,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail:ysf@gl.chd.edu.cn
周世昊(1997—),男,河南焦作人,博士生,主要从事岩土工程深基础工程方向研究。E-mail:2022021003@chd.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2024-05-28

  网络出版日期: 2025-03-12

基金资助

福建省交通运输科技项目(202105);海南省交通科技项目(HNZXY2015-045R);国家自然科学基金青年科学(4190070568)

Difference in Dynamic Response of Large Diameter and Variable Cross Section Single and Group Piles in Liquefied Sites

  • Feng Zhongju ,
  • Zhou Shihao ,
  • Zhang Cong ,
  • Song Jian ,
  • Lin Lihua
Expand
  • 1. Highway School, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, P.R. China;
    2. Xiamen Road and Bridge Engineering Investment and Development Co., Ltd., Xiamen, Fujian 361000, P.R. China

Received date: 2024-05-28

  Online published: 2025-03-12

摘要

为研究地震作用下大直径变截面群桩基础在与单桩基础抗液化性能方面的差异,依托第二东通道工程,采用振动台模型试验开展大直径变截面单桩、群桩基础动力响应差异性研究,分析了饱和砂土层中大直径变截面单、群桩在地震荷载下,孔压比、桩身加速度、桩顶水平位移和桩身弯矩差异。结果表明:地震荷载为0.30 g,大直径变截面单桩与群桩工况下,基础均发生液化现象,大直径变截面群桩基础完全液化时刻比单桩基础延缓1.58~1.64 s;大直径变截面群桩桩身最大加速度较单桩减小,且出现时刻较单桩更为滞后;大直径变截面群桩桩顶最大水平位移较单桩减小0.68 mm,出现时刻滞后1.44 s;大直径变截面群桩基础最大弯矩值较单桩基础减小11.99%,大直径变截面群桩基础最大弯矩出现时刻较单桩基础滞后1.88 s;大直径变截面群桩基础的抗液化特性明显高于单桩基础,动力响应更为滞后,在地震区桩基础设计中,可考虑用大直径变截面群桩基础形式增加其抗液化特性。

本文引用格式

冯忠居 , 周世昊 , 张聪 , 宋健 , 林立华 . 液化场地大直径变截面单桩群桩动力响应差异[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2025 , 21(1) : 198 -206 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2025.01.22

Abstract

With the purpose of researching the distinctions between the anti liquefaction capability of large-diameter variable cross-section group piles foundation and single pile foundation under earthquake condition, relying on the Second East Passage Project, the dynamic response difference of large-diameter variable cross-section single pile and group piles foundation was studied by vibration table model testing, and the difference of pore pressure ratio, pile shaft acceleration, pile top horizontal displacement and pile shaft bending moment between large-diameter variable cross-section single pile and group of piles in saturated sandy soil under earthquake load was analyzed. The research results show that under the seismic load of 0.30 g, the foundation of large diameter and variable cross-section single pile and pile group are liquefied, and the complete liquefaction time of large diameter and variable cross-section group piles foundation is 1.58~1.61 s later than that of single pile foundation; The maximum acceleration of large diameter variable cross-section group piles is reduced compared to single piles, and the occurrence time is more delayed than single piles; The maximum horizontal displacement of the top of a large diameter variable cross-section pile group is reduced by 0.68 mm compared to a single pile, with a time lag of 1.44 seconds; The maximum bending moment of large diameter variable cross-section group piles foundation is 11.99% less than that of single pile foundation, and the maximum bending moment of great diameter variable cross-section group piles foundation lags 1.88 s behind that of single pile foundation; It reveals that the anti liquefaction features of large diameter and variable cross-section group piles foundation are significantly higher than that of single pile foundation, and the dynamic response is more delayed. In the design of pile foundation in earthquake area, the anti liquefaction features of large diameter and variable cross-section group piles foundation can be increased by using the form of large diameter and varying cross-section group piles foundation.

参考文献

[1] Feng Z, Huo J, Hu H, et al. Research on corrosion damage and bearing characteristics of bridge pile foundation concrete under a dry-wet-freeze-thaw cycle[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 2021,2021:1-13.
[2] 谭婕,王奎华,涂园,等.大直径变截面桩速度波衰减特性研究与应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2021,40(2):419-431.(Tan Jie, Wang Kuihua, Tu Yuan, et al. Velocity wave attenuation characteristics of large-diameter variable section piles and the application, [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering 2021,40(2): 419-431.(in Chinese))
[3] 江杰,柴文成,欧孝夺,等.基于Timoshenko-Pasternak模型的多向受荷桩水平动力响应分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2022,41(1):172-185.(Jiang Jie, Chai Wencheng, Ou Xiaoduo, et al. Horizontal dynamic response analysis of multi-directional loaded piles based on Timoshenko-Pasternak model [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2022,41(1): 172-185.(in Chinese))
[4] 冯忠居,王溪清,李孝雄,等.地震作用下的砂土液化对桩基力学特性影响[J]. 交通运输工程学报,2019,19(1):71-84.(Feng Zhongju, Wang Xiqing, Li Xiaoxiong, et al. Effect of sand liquefaction on the mechanical properties of pile foundations under strong earthquakes [J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019,19(1): 71-84.(in Chinese))
[5] 冯忠居,孟莹莹,董芸秀,等.地震作用下液化场地桩-土非线性动力相互作用特性[J]. 科学技术与工程,2021,21(17):7299-7307.(Feng Zhongju, Meng Yingying, Dong Yunxiu, et al. Nonlinear dynamic interaction characteristics of pile-soil in liquefaction site under strong earthquake [J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2021,21 (17): 7299-7307.(in Chinese))
[6] Zhang C, Feng Z, Guan Y, et al. Study on liquefaction resistance of pile group by shaking table test[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2022, 2022(1):1-12.
[7] 冯忠居,李玉婷,蔡杰,等.地震作用软土震陷特性及变截面群桩动力响应[J]. 湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2023, 50(9):109-118.(Feng Zhongju, Li Yuting, Cai Jie, et al. Seismic subsidence characteristics of soft soil and dynamic response of pile group with variable cross section [J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences),2023, 50(9):109-118.(in Chinese))
[8] 张聪,冯忠居,孟莹莹,等.单桩与群桩基础动力时程响应差异振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学,2022,43(5):1326-1334.(Zhang Cong, Feng Zhongju, Meng Yingying, et al. Shaking table test on the difference of dynamic time-history response between single pile and pile group foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022,43 (5): 1326-1334.(in Chinese))
[9] 冯忠居,王伟,张聪,等.震陷土层变化下变截面单、群桩动力响应差异[J]. 上海交通大学学报,2024,58(7): 1086-1096.(Feng Zhongju, Wang Wei, Zhang Cong, et al. Dynamic rseponse dfference of single pile and pile group with variable section variation of seismic subsidence soil layer [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2024,58(7): 1086-1096.(in Chinese))
[10] 冯忠居,张聪,何静斌,等.地震作用下群桩基础抗液化性能的振动台试验[J]. 交通运输工程学报,2021,21(4):72-83.(Feng Zhongju, Zhang Cong, He Jingbin, et al. Shaking table test of liquefaction resistance of group pile under strong earthquake [J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021,21 (4): 72-83.(in Chinese))
[11] 何静斌,冯忠居,董芸秀,等.地震区桩-土-断层耦合作用下桩基动力响应[J]. 岩土力学,2020,41(7):2389-2400.(He Jingbin, Feng Zhongju, Dong Yunxiu, et al, Wang Zhen. Dynamic response of pile foundation under pile-soil-fault coupling effect in meizoseismal area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020,41 (7): 2389-2400.(in Chinese))
[12] 李雨润,闫志晓,张健.液化场地群桩基础地震反应离心机试验及损伤数值模型研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2023,42(1):212-223.(Li Yurun, Yan Zhixiao, Zhang Jian. Seismic response of pile group foundations in liquefied sites based on centrifuge test and numerical simulation [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2023,42 (1): 212-223.(in Chinese))
[13] Garala T K, Madabhushi G S P. Seismic behaviour of soft clay and its influence on the response of friction pile foundations[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2019, 17(4):1919-1939.
[14] Ding H R. Seismic responses study of pile-groups foundation[A]//Fourth International Conference on Digital Manufacturing & Automation[C]. IEEE, 2013.
[15] Naeini A J, Choobbasti A J, Saadati M. Seismic behaviour of pile in three-layered soil (case study: Babol City Center Project)[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2013, 6(11):4487-4497.
[16] Tamura S. Dynamic response and failure mechanisms of a pile foundation during soil liquefaction by shaking table test with a large-scale laminar shear box[A]//Proceeding of 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engrgineering Reference[C]. 2000.
[17] Li Y R, Liang Y, Wei X, et al. Study on lateral dynamic response of pile foundation in liquefiable soil by using FBG method[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2012, 238: 337-340.
[18] Goh S H, Zhang L. Estimation of peak acceleration and bending moment for pile-raft systems embedded in soft clay subjected to far-field seismic excitation[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2017, 143(11):04017082.1-04017082.17.
[19] Rovithis E, Mylonakis G, Pitilakis K. Dynamic stiffness and kinematic response of single piles in inhomogeneous soil[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering,2013,11(6): 1949-1972.
[20] 张健,李雨润,闫志晓,等.基于频谱分析的饱和砂土场地直斜群桩承台—土体耦合作用下桩身弯矩分布规律研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2020,39(4):829-844.(Zhang Jian, Li Yurun, Yan Zhixiao, et al. Study on the distribution law of the bending moment of vertical and batter piles in saturated sand under cap and soil coupling based on frequency analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2020,39(4): 829-844.(in Chinese))
[21] 许成顺,贾科敏,杜修力,等.液化侧向扩展场地-桩基础抗震研究综述[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报,2021,41(4):768-791.(Xu Chengshun, Jia Kemin, Du Xiuli, et al. Review on seismic behavior of pile foundation subjected to liquefac-tion induced lateral spreading [J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2021,41 (4): 768-791.(in Chinese))
[22] 赫中营,叶爱君.群桩效应对砂土地基中高桩承台群桩基础抗震性能的影响[J]. 土木工程学报,2014,47(1):117-126.(He Zhongying, Ye Aijun. Influence of group effect on the seismic performance of elevated pile-cap foundation in sand [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2014,47(1): 117-126.(in Chinese))
[23] 王晓伟,Guillermo Blanco,叶爱君,等.砂土中桥梁高桩承台基础的抗震延性能力参数分析[J]. 土木工程学报,2018,51(5):112-121.(Wang Xiaowei, Guillermo Blanco, Ye Aijun, et al. Parameter study on seismic ductility capacity of bridge elevated pile-cap foundation in sandy [J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2018,51(5): 112-121.(in Chinese))
[24] 袁林娟,刘小生,汪小刚,等.振动台土-箱结构模型动力特性及反应的解析分析[J]. 岩土工程学报,2012,34(6):1038-1042.(Yuan Linjuan, Liu Xiaosheng, Wang Xiaogang, et al. Analytic solution of dynamic characteristics and responses of soil-box model for shaking table tests [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012,34(6): 1038-1042.(in Chinese))
[25] 李延涛,田野,宗金辉.多维地震下考虑地表建筑的土和隧道的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2022,41(7):1453-1465.(Li Yantao, Ye Ye, Zong Jinhui. Shaking table test of a tunnel-soil system considering the influence of surface buildings under multi-dimensional seismic waves [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2022,41 (7): 1453-1465.(in Chinese))
[26] 凌贤长,王臣,王成.液化场地桩-土-桥梁结构动力相互作用振动台试验模型相似设计方法[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2004, 23(3):450-456.(Ling Xianchang, Wang Chen, Wang Cheng. Scale modeling method of shaking table test of dynamic interaction of pile-soil-bridge structure in ground of soil liquefaction [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004,23(3): 450-456.(in Chinese))
[27] 冯忠居,张聪,何静斌,等.地震作用下群桩基础抗液化性能的振动台试验[J]. 交通运输工程学报,2021,21(4):72-83.(Feng Zhongju, Zhang Cong, He Jingbin, et al. Shaking table test of liquefaction resistance of group pile under strong earthquake [J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2021,21 (4): 72-83.(in Chinese))
[28] 冯忠居,孟莹莹,董芸秀,等.地震作用下液化场地桩-土非线性动力相互作用特性[J]. 科学技术与工程,2021,21(17):7299-7307.(Feng Zhongju, Meng Yingying, Dong Yunxiu, et al. Nonlinear dynamic interaction characteristics of pile-soil in liquefaction site under strong earthquake [J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2021,21 (17): 7299-7307.(in Chinese))
[29] 冯忠居,关云辉,赖德金,等.地震作用下桩-土-断层非线性动力相互作用特性[J]. 世界地震工程,2021,37(4):167-176.(Feng Zhongju, Guan Yunhui, Lai Dejin, et al. Nonlinear dynamic interaction characteristics of pile-soil-fault under strong earthquake [J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2021,37(4): 167-176(in Chinese))
[30] 柳春光,孙国帅,韩亮,等.桥梁水下桩墩结构振动台模型试验相似律验证[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2012,32(4):13-18.(Liu Chunguang, Sun Guoshuai, Han Liang, et al. Validation of similitude laws for shaking table model test of dynamic interaction of water-pile-pier superstructure [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2012,32(4): 13-18.(in Chinese))
文章导航

/