理论与试验研究

基于刀盘振动特征的双模盾构掘进地层识别模型

  • 吴忧 ,
  • 周小雄 ,
  • 曹玉新 ,
  • 龚秋明 ,
  • 吴帆
展开
  • 1.北京工业大学 城市防灾与减灾教育部重点实验室,北京 100124;
    2.清华大学 水沙科学与水利水电工程国家重点实验室,北京 100084;
    3.中电建铁路建设投资集团有限公司,北京 100044
吴忧(1998—),男,安徽安庆人,硕士,主要从事隧道施工等领域的科研工作。E-mail:wyou1998@163.com
龚秋明(1969—),男,北京人,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程、地下工程等领域的研究工作。E-mail:gongqiuming@bjut.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2024-05-12

  网络出版日期: 2025-01-22

Ground Recognition Model of Dual-Mode Shield Tunneling Based on Cutterhead Vibration Features

  • Wu You ,
  • Zhou Xiaoxiong ,
  • Cao Yuxin ,
  • Gong Qiuming ,
  • Wu Fan
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, P.R. China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P.R. China;
    3. Power China Railway Construction Investment Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100044, P.R. China

Received date: 2024-05-12

  Online published: 2025-01-22

摘要

准确的掌子面地层信息对于土压平衡与TBM双模式盾构掘进控制以及模式转换至关重要,刀盘振动是双模盾构在掘进中与地层相互作用的直接响应,在不同地层条件下呈现出显著特征差异。本研究依托深圳地铁12号线怀福区间双模盾构施工段,通过在盾构上搭载振动监测系统对该区间掘进过程中的刀盘振动数据进行采集,创建振动与地层类型数据库。采用信号处理技术,对振动信号的关键特征进行提取与分析,并作为输入建立双模盾构掘进掌子面地层类型识别模型。该模型使用了Stacking集成技术,取决策树、K近邻、支持向量分类和AdaBoost作为基学习器,逻辑回归为元学习器。通过对怀福区间数据集进行测试,模型取得95.7%的准确率,显著优于DT、KNN、SVC、AdaBoost等传统机器学习模型,并得到了对地层类型最敏感的刀盘振动关键特征,包括均方根值、方根幅值和平均频域等。研究可为盾构施工地层实时识别提供新途径。

本文引用格式

吴忧 , 周小雄 , 曹玉新 , 龚秋明 , 吴帆 . 基于刀盘振动特征的双模盾构掘进地层识别模型[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2024 , 20(S2) : 629 -637 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2024.S2.14

Abstract

Accurate ground information of tunnel face is essential for earth pressure balance and TBM dual-mode shield tunneling control and mode changeover, and the cutterhead vibration is a direct response to the interaction between the dual-mode shield and the ground during tunneling, which presents significant characteristic differences under different ground conditions. The study relies on the construction section of the double-mode shield of Shenzhen Metro Line 12, Huai Fu, and the vibration data of the cutterhead during the tunneling process is collected by carrying a vibration monitoring system on the shield to create a database of vibration and ground types. The key features of the vibration signals were extracted and analyzed using signal processing techniques, and used as input to establish a model for recognition the ground types at the tunnel surface of the double-mode shield tunneling. The model uses Stacking integration technique, taking decision tree, K-nearest neighbor, support vector classification and AdaBoost as base learners and logistic regression as meta-learners. By testing the Huai Fu section dataset, the model achieved an accuracy of 95.7%, which was significantly better than traditional machine learning models such as DT, KNN, SVC, and AdaBoost, and obtained the key cutterhead vibration features that were most sensitive to ground types, including root mean square value, root mean square amplitude, and mean frequency domain. This study provides a new approach for real-time identification of geological types in shield tunnel construction in the future.

参考文献

[1] 龚秋明. 掘进机隧道掘进概论[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2014.
[2] Huang X, Liu Q, Liu H, et al. Development and in-situ application of a real-time monitoring system for the interaction between TBM and surrounding rock[J].Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 81:187-208.
[3] Liu M, Liao S, Yang Y, et al. Tunnel boring machine vibration-based deep learning for the ground identification of working faces[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2021, 13(6): 1340-1357.
[4] Huo J, Sun X, Li G, et al. Multi-degree-of-freedom coupling dynamic characteristic of TBM disc cutter under shock excitation[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2015, 22(9): 3326-3337.
[5] Wu F, Gong Q, Li Z, et al. Development and application of cutterhead vibration monitoring system for TBM tunnelling[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2021, 146: 104887.
[6] Henriquez P, Alonso J B, Ferrer M A, et al. Review of automatic fault diagnosis systems using audio and vibration signals[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2013, 44(5): 642-652.
[7] Amirat Y,Benbouzid M E H, Al-Ahmar E, et al. A brief status on condition monitoring and fault diagnosis in wind energy conversion systems[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13(9): 2629-2636.
[8] Zhang C, Mousavi A A, Masri S F, et al. Vibration feature extraction using signal processing techniques for structural health monitoring: A review[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2022, 177: 109175.
[9] Lei Y, He Z, Zi Y, et al. Fault diagnosis of rotating machinery based on multiple ANFIS combination with GAs[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2007, 21(5): 2280-2294.
[10] Buckley T, Ghosh B,Pakrashi V. A feature extraction & selection benchmark for structural health monitoring[J]. Structural Health Monitoring, 2022, 22(85): 14759217221111141.
[11] 张娜, 李建斌, 荆留杰, 等. TBM 掘进参数智能控制系统的研究与应用[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2018, 38 (10): 1734-1740.
[12] Liu Z, Li L, Fang X, et al. Hard-rock tunnel lithology prediction with TBM construction big data using a global-attention-mechanism-based LSTM network[J]. Automation in Construction, 2021, 125: 103647.
[13] Guan Z, Deng T, Du S, et al. Markovian geology prediction approach and its application in mountain tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2012, 31(5):61-67.
[14] 丁小彬, 谢宇轩, 薛皓文, 等. 基于神经网络的盾构滚刀磨损量预测方法探讨[J].地下空间与工程学报, 2023, 19(2): 560-570.
[15] 周小雄, 龚秋明, 殷丽君,等. 基于BLSTM-AM模型的TBM稳定段掘进参数预测[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2020, 39(增2): 3505-3515.
[16] 刘诗洋, 陈祖煜, 张云旆, 等.基于卷积神经网络对 TBM 塌方段的反演分析[J]. 固体力学学报, 2021, 42(3): 287-301.
[17] Breiman L. Bagging predictors[J]. Machine Learning, 1996, 24(2): 123-140.
[18] Friedman J H. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine[J]. Annals of Statistics, 2001, 29(5): 1189-1232.
[19] Polikar R. Ensemble Machine Learning[J]. Scholarpedia, 2009, 4(1):2776.
文章导航

/