理论与试验研究

考虑细粒填土强度各向异性的主动土压力研究

  • 刘杰 ,
  • 刘忠玉
展开
  • 1.新郑市恒泰城建有限公司,郑州 451150;
    2.郑州大学 土木工程学院,郑州 450001
刘杰(1982—),男,河南新郑人,中级经济师,主要从事建筑施工与管理等领域的研究工作。E-mail:838143914@qq.com
刘忠玉(1968—),男,河南延津人,博士,教授,主要从事岩土力学等领域的研究工作。E-mail: zhyliu@zzu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2024-05-16

  网络出版日期: 2025-01-22

基金资助

河南省科技攻关项目(232102320352)

Active Earth Pressure Calculation Considering Strength Anisotropy of Fine-Grained Fill

  • Liu Jie ,
  • Liu Zhongyu
Expand
  • 1. Xinzheng Hengtai Urban Construction Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou 451150, P.R. China;
    2. School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, P.R. China

Received date: 2024-05-16

  Online published: 2025-01-22

摘要

为考虑细颗粒填土强度各向异性对土压力的影响,通过直剪试验测定了压实粉质填土多个剪切面上的抗剪强度,证明抗剪强度参数和剪切面倾角之间的关系可用椭圆形函数表示。在朗肯土压力基本假定基础上,假定墙后为横观各向同性填土且压实面水平,通过对处于主动极限状态下的滑动土楔进行受力分析,得到了滑裂面倾角和主动土压力合力的表达式。对墙后填土的极限应力状态的分析表明,作用于墙背上的主动土压力为线性分布。参数分析表明,不论考虑黏聚力各向异性还是考虑内摩擦角各向异性,都会得到比各向同性填土更大的主动土压力值。和各向同性填土相比,黏聚力各向异性会使滑裂面更陡。同时,考虑内摩擦角各向异性时,在内摩擦角较小的填土中会得到更陡的滑裂面,而在内摩擦角较大的填土中,则会得到较缓的滑裂面。

本文引用格式

刘杰 , 刘忠玉 . 考虑细粒填土强度各向异性的主动土压力研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2024 , 20(S2) : 560 -565 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2024.S2.06

Abstract

In order to consider the effect of strength anisotropy on earth pressure, the shear strengths on different shear planes of compacted silty fill are measured by direct shear tests. It is proved that the relationship between shear strength parameters and the dip angle of the shear plane can be expressed by the elliptic function. On the basis of Rankine's assumption of earth pressure, assuming that the transverse isotropic fill behind the wall has a horizontal compaction surface, the expressions of the dip angle of the slip surface and the resultant force of active earth pressure are obtained by analyzing the force balance of sliding wedge in the active limit state. The analysis of the ultimate stress state of the fill behind the wall shows that the active earth pressure acting on the back of the wall is linear. Parameter analysis shows that considering the anisotropy of cohesion and the anisotropy of internal friction angle, the active earth pressure value is greater than that of isotropic fill. Compared with isotropic fill, the anisotropy of cohesion makes the slip surface steeper. In addition, considering the anisotropy of the internal friction angle, the steeper sliding surface will be obtained in the fill with a smaller internal friction angle, while the slower sliding surface will be obtained in the fill with a larger internal friction angle.

参考文献

[1] 顾慧慈. 挡土墙土压力计算手册[M]. 北京:中国建材工业出版社,2005.
[2] 王元战, 李新国, 陈楠楠. 挡土墙主动土压力分布与侧压力系数[J]. 岩土力学, 2005, 26(7): 1019-1022.
[3] 刘忠玉,陈捷.平动模式下考虑剪应力作用的刚性 挡土墙主动土压力计算[J]. 岩土工程学报,2016,38(12): 2254-2261.
[4] 刘忠玉. 有限无黏性填土刚性挡土墙主动土压力计算[J]. 中国公路学报,2018,31(2):154-164.
[5] 林敬辉,田雨. 考虑土层各向异性的朗肯被动土压力公式[J]. 公路,2021(12):76-81.
[6] 宋飞,张建民. 考虑侧向变形的各向异性砂土土压力试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2009,28(9):1884-1895.
[7] 田雨,姚仰平,路德春,等.基于修正应力法的横观各向同性摩尔-库仑准则及被动土压力公式[J]. 岩土力学,2019,40(10):3945-3950.
[8] 姚仰平,唐科松.土的各向同性化变换应力方法[J]. 力学学报,2022,54(6):1651-1659.
[9] 刘洋,王怡萱,杨光昌.基于墙后填土各向异性强度的土压力计算方法[J]. 长江科学院院报,2023,40(1):116-122,131.
[10] Casagrande A, Carrillo N. Discussion on study of failure envelope of soils[J]. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, 1944, 89(4): 243.
[11] Lo K Y. Stability of slopes in anisotropic soils[J]. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, 1965, 91 (4): 77-82.
[12] Stockton E, Leshchinsky B A, Olsen M J, et al. Influence of both anisotropic friction and cohesion on the formation of tension cracks and stability of slopes[J]. Engineering Geology, 2019, 249: 31-44.
[13] 于鹏强,刘洋, 彭银刚,等. 考虑填土各向异性的主动土压力计算[J]. 土木工程学报,2019,52(增1):218-225.
[14] Tatsuoka F, Sakamoto M, Kawamura T, et al. Strength and deformation characteristics of sand in plane strain compression at extremely low pressures[J]. Soils & Foundations, 1986, 26(1): 65-84.
[15] 李庆铠. 黄泛区粉土的各向异性强度及挡土墙主动土压力研究[D]. 郑州:郑州大学,2021.
文章导航

/