理论与试验研究

花岗岩风化土层长螺旋桩承载特性与机理研究

  • 隋耀华 ,
  • 张旭群 ,
  • 刘健美 ,
  • 李兆锋 ,
  • 李锦辉
展开
  • 1.广州地铁设计研究院股份有限公司,广州 510010;
    2.哈尔滨工业大学(深圳) 土木与环境工程学院,广东 深圳 518055
隋耀华(1977—),男,内蒙古赤峰人,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事岩土勘察、设计与研究工作。E-mail:suiyaohua@dtsjy.com
李兆锋(1991—),男,广东佛山人,博士,副教授,主要从事特殊土力学的研究工作。E-mail:lizhaofeng@hit.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2024-04-22

  网络出版日期: 2025-01-03

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(52209126);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(2023A1515012860);深圳市科技计划资助项目(GXWD20231129105817002)

Bearing Characteristics and Mechanism of Continuous Flight Auger Pile in Weathered Granitic Soil

  • Sui Yaohua ,
  • Zhang Xuqun ,
  • Liu Jianmei ,
  • Li Zhaofeng ,
  • Li Jinhui
Expand
  • 1. Guangzhou Metro Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510010, P. R. China;
    2. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, P. R. China

Received date: 2024-04-22

  Online published: 2025-01-03

摘要

华南地区广泛分布裂隙发育且遇水软化的花岗岩风化土,该特殊土内常用的泥浆护壁桩承载力大幅损失,作为建筑业新技术的长螺旋钻孔压灌桩则能够发挥更高的承载力,甚至超出规范中干作业成孔桩取值范围。为明确花岗岩风化土层内长螺旋桩的承载力优势及发挥机理,本文在广州黄埔开展该桩型的静载试验和光纤感知测量。结果表明:长螺旋桩承载力为相同尺寸泥浆护壁桩的2倍,与桩径和桩长正相关,600~800 mm桩径范围内无尺寸效应;采用超弱光纤光栅技术测得侧摩阻力服从单峰分布,随着荷载的增加峰值位置从残积土层下移至全风化层;两类风化土中极限侧摩阻力为128 kPa和154 kPa,超出广东省/行业规范经验取值范围,全风化层中极限端阻力为3 080 kPa,高出经验值1倍。通过现场土层开挖与原状土CT扫描发现,同步压灌混凝土和提升钻杆的成孔方法避免了裂隙水发展及对其桩—土界面的软化,该桩型承载力优于泥浆护壁桩和其他干作业成孔桩。

本文引用格式

隋耀华 , 张旭群 , 刘健美 , 李兆锋 , 李锦辉 . 花岗岩风化土层长螺旋桩承载特性与机理研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2024 , 20(6) : 1935 -1943 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2024.06.19

Abstract

Weathered granitic soil is widely distributed in south China, which is fissure-rich and water-weakened. In such a special soil, bearing capacity of the commonly used slurry displacement (SD) pile is significantly lessened, while as a new technology, the continuous flight auger (CFA) pile performs superiorly, and even exceed the empirical value range for dry-drilling pile in design code. To reveal the bearing characteristics and mechanism of CFA pile in weathered granitic soil, a series of static load tests and optic fiber-based measurement on the CFA piles were performed in Huangpu District, Guangzhou. The test results show that the ultimate bearing capacity of CFA pile was twice of that of SD pile with the same dimensions, and was positively correlated to pile diameter and pile length. Size effect was not observed in the diameter range of 600 mm to 800 mm. By incorporating the ultraweak Fiber Bragg Grating sensing technique, the shaft resistance was found to follow the unimodal distribution, with the peak driven deeper from GRS to CDG by the increasing load. Ultimate shaft resistances in GRS and CDG were estimated as 128 kPa and 154 kPa, respectively, both exceeding the empirical value ranges in Guangdong/industrial pile design code. The ultimate base resistance in CDG was estimated as 3 080 kPa, double of the empirical value. Based on the soil profile excavated in the field and the CT scan image of undisturbed GRS sample, is attributed to that the associated installation method, where the pumping out of concrete and the withdraw of drill stem are executed synchronously, prohibits the development of fissure water and the resultant deterioration of the soil-pile interface. The bearing capacity of the pile type is better than that of mud pile and other dry working pile.

参考文献

[1] 袁航, 谢曦, 浮明明, 等. 复杂地质条件下大直径长螺旋钻孔压灌桩施工效率提升技术[J]. 施工技术, 2021, 50(6): 106-109. (Yuan Hang, Xie Xi, Fu Mingming, et al. Technologies for improving construction efficiency of large diameter long spiral bored pressure grouting piles under complex geological conditions[J]. Construction Technology, 2021, 50(6): 106-109. (in Chinese))
[2] 周同和, 张浩, 郭院成, 等.扩体桩的作用机制与工程理论[J].地下空间与工程学报, 2021, 17(4): 1117-1123, 1136. (Zhou Tonghe, Zhang Hao, Guo Yuancheng, et al. Mechanism analysis and application theory of reamed composite piles[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2021, 17(4): 1117-1123, 1136. (in Chinese))
[3] 邵海兵, 林娜, 王剑春, 等. 钻孔灌注桩在富水砂性土层中的应用[J].水运工程, 2020, 565(1): 168-172. (Shao Haibing, Lin Na, Wang Jianchun, et al. Application of bored pile in water-rich sandy soil[J]. Port and Waterway Engineering, 2020, 565(1): 168-172. (in Chinese))
[4] 白晓宇, 张明义, 闫楠, 等. 风化岩地基大直径长螺旋钻孔灌注桩承载性状试验研究[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 49(12): 3087-3094. (Bai Xiaoyu, Zhang Mingyi, Yan Nan, et al. Experimental study on bearing capacity of large diameter long auger bored pile in weathered rock foundation[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2018, 49(12): 3087-3094. (in Chinese))
[5] Liu B, Zhang D, Xi P. Mechanical behaviors of SD and CFA piles using BOTDA-based fiber optic sensor system: A comparative field test study[J]. Measurement, 2017, 104: 253-262.
[6] 滑鹏林, 安一清. 长螺旋钻孔压灌混凝土抗压抗拔构件承载性状试验研究[J]. 建筑结构, 2018, 48(11): 109-113. (Hua Penglin, An Yiqing. Experimental study on bearing properties of compression and uplift components with long spiral drilled compression grouting concrete[J]. Building Structure, 2018, 48(11): 109-113. (in Chinese))
[7] 陈霄. 长螺旋钻孔压灌桩技术在厚砂层夹杂液化土层复杂地质条件下的应用[J]. 建筑技术开发, 2022, 49(14): 34-36. (Chen Xiao. Application of long auger drilling bored pile under combined condition of liquefied formation and thick sand layer[J]. Building Technology Development, 2022, 49(14): 34-36. (in Chinese))
[8] 周水, 郑俊杰. 长螺旋钻孔压灌混凝土桩在深厚淤泥质土中的应用[J]. 土工基础, 2002(3): 31-33. (Zhou Shui, Zheng Junjie. The use of long screw drilled grout-cast-in-place pile in deep mucky soil[J]. Soil Engineering and Foundation, 2002(3): 31-33. (in Chinese))
[9] Farrell E R, Lawler M L. CFA pilebehaviour in very stiff lodgement till[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 161(1): 49-57.
[10] 刘钟, 杨松, 卢璟春, 等. 螺旋挤土灌注桩与长螺旋灌注桩承载力足尺试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010 (增2): 127-131. (Liu Zhong, Yang Song, Lu Jingchun, et al. Full scale field load tests on bearing capacity of SDS pile and CFA pile[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010 (Supp.2): 127-131. (in Chinese))
[11] Gavin K G, Cadogan D, Casey P. Shaft capacity of continuous flight auger piles in sand[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2009, 135(6): 790-798.
[12] 满朝晖, 杨丽娜, 张小辉. 湿陷性黄土地区CFG桩施工工艺应用分析[J]. 土工基础, 2020, 34(3): 265-268. (Man Chaohui, Yang Lina, Zhang Xiaohui. Application of CFG Column Method in collapsible loess improvement[J]. Soil Engineering and Foundation, 2020, 34(3): 265-268. (in Chinese))
[13] 胡瑞丰, 周保良, 吴雄志, 等. 基于ABAQUS的软土地区长螺旋施工过程桩周土体孔压变化规律分析[J]. 勘察科学技术, 2022(5): 24-27. (Hu Ruifeng, Zhou Baoliang, Wu Zhixiong, et al. Analysis of pore water pressure variation rule of soil around pile during long spiral construction in soft soil area based on ABAQUS[J]. Site Investigation Science and Technology, 2022(5): 24-27. (in Chinese))
[14] Arab M G,Abdelmoghni M, Akl S A Y, et al. Numerical modeling of unfavorable CFA pile drilling conditions[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2020, 38: 6869-6889.
[15] Doan L V, Lehane B M. CPT-based design method for axial capacities of drilled shafts and auger cast-in-place piles[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2021, 147(8): 04021077.
[16] Coleman D M, Arcement B J. Evaluation of design methods for auger cast piles in mixed soil conditions[A]//Deep Foundations 2002: An International Perspective on Theory, Design, Construction, and Performance[C]. 2002: 1404-1420.
[17] 胡焕校, 夏凌云, 周立祥. 基于灰色系统预测长螺旋钻孔压灌混凝土桩的极限承载力[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2010, 30(7): 118-122. (Hu Huanxiao, Xia Lingyun, Zhou Lixiang. Predicting ultimate bearing capacity of auger bored cast-with-pressure concrete pile based on gray system[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 2010, 30(7): 118-122. (in Chinese))
[18] 梁志荣,李忠诚,刘江,等.三轴水泥土搅拌桩强度分析及试验研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2009,5(增2):1562-1567.(Liang Zhirong,Li Zhongcheng,Liu Jiang,et al.Strength analysis and experimental research on soil-cement mixed pile made by triaxial stirring machine[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2009,5(Supp.2):1562-1567.(in Chinese))
[19] 刘小斌, 李兆锋, 泰培, 等. 拉力型锚杆锚固体应力分布规律的现场试验研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2021, 17(增1): 63-70. (Liu Xiaobin, Li Zhaofeng, Tai Pei, et al. In-situ experimental investigation on stress distribution of grout body of tension-type ground anchor[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2021, 17(Supp.1): 63-70. (in Chinese))
[20] 林志豪, 陈宏湛, 陈仁伟, 等. 滨海软基后注浆灌注桩承载性状现场试验研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2022, 18(增2): 578-586. (Lin Zhihao, Chen Hongzhan, Chen Renwei, et al. Field test on bearing behavior of cast-in-situ pile with post grouting in coastal soft foundation[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2022, 18(Supp.2): 578-586. (in Chinese))
[21] 吕军, 聂如松, 魏丽敏. 桩身残余应力的机理分析与测试方法[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2019, 15(3): 885-890. (Lv Jun, Nie Rusong, Wei Limin. Mechanisms of residual sress on piles and its measurement methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2019, 15(3): 885-890. (in Chinese))
文章导航

/