防灾与环境

运营隧道拱部衬砌厚度不足及脱空的危害与整治

  • 嵇诚 ,
  • 龚伦 ,
  • 樊永杰 ,
  • 张鹏
展开
  • 1.西南交通大学,交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室,成都 610031;
    2.中国铁路成都局集团有限公司,成都 610031
嵇诚(1999—),男,江苏扬州人,硕士生,主要从事运营隧道维修养护相关研究工作。E-mail:1127612567@qq.com
龚伦(1974—),男,重庆人,博士,副教授,主要从事主要从事隧道近接施工以及隧道维修加固研究。E-mail: gonglun33@ 126.com

收稿日期: 2023-12-22

  网络出版日期: 2024-10-31

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(51478392)

Research on Inadequate Lining Thickness and Dehollowing Hazards and Remediation in the Vault Area of Operational Tunnels

  • Ji Cheng ,
  • Gong Lun ,
  • Fan Yongjie ,
  • Zhang Peng
Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering, Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, P.R. China;
    2. China Railway Chengdu Bureau Group Ltd., Chengdu 610031, P.R. China

Received date: 2023-12-22

  Online published: 2024-10-31

摘要

运营隧道拱顶存在衬砌厚度不足及脱空的情况十分常见,不及时整治可能会造成衬砌局部开裂、掉块等问题,威胁隧道运营安全。通过资料调研、数值计算及现场应用等方法,开展该类缺陷的危害性及整治措施研究。研究表明:以纵、环向2.0 m和6.0 m为界对衬砌厚度不足及脱空的严重程度进行了分级;当衬砌缺陷范围较小时,衬砌厚度变化对衬砌应力影响较小,当衬砌缺陷范围大于4 m2、衬砌厚度小于设计厚度40% 时会引起衬砌应力突变;当缺陷纵、环向单一尺寸大于2 m时,环向尺寸比纵向尺寸更易引起衬砌应力的变化;结合衬砌缺陷程度分级和衬砌厚度,对应提出了充填注浆、开窗修补和套衬3种整治方案;经依托工程实际应用,验证了缺陷程度分级的正确性、整治方案的可行性和有效性,可为隧道衬砌厚度不足及脱空的整治提供借鉴。

本文引用格式

嵇诚 , 龚伦 , 樊永杰 , 张鹏 . 运营隧道拱部衬砌厚度不足及脱空的危害与整治[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2024 , 20(5) : 1706 -1716 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2024.05.27

Abstract

Inadequate lining thickness and debonding are very common in operating tunnel vaults, which may cause local cracking and falling blocks in the lining and threaten tunnel operation safety if not rectified in time. By means of data research, numerical calculation and field application, the hazards of such defects and their remediation measures were studied. The study shows that: the severity of insufficient lining thickness and debonding is graded by 2.0 m and 6.0 m in longitudinal and circular directions; When the lining defect range is small, the lining thickness change has less effect on the lining stress. When the lining defect range is larger than 4 m2 and the lining thickness is less than 40% of the design thickness, it will cause sudden change of lining stress; When the single size of defects in longitudinal and circular directions is larger than 2 m, the circular dimension is more likely than the longitudinal. When the longitudinal and circumferential single size of defects is larger than 2 m, the circumferential size is more likely to cause the change of lining stress than the longitudinal size; Combined with the grading of lining defects and lining thickness, three remediation schemes of filling and grouting, window repair and lining set are proposed; Based on the actual application of the project, the correctness of the grading of defects and the feasibility and effectiveness of the remediation scheme are verified, which can provide some guidance and reference for the remediation of insufficient tunnel lining thickness and dehollowing.

参考文献

[1] 田四明, 王伟, 巩江峰.中国铁路隧道发展与展望(含截至2020年底中国铁路隧道统计数据)[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2021, 41(2): 308-325. (Tian Siming, Wang Wei, Gong Jiangfeng. China railway tunnels development and outlook(with China railway tunnels statistics up to the end of 2020) [J]. Tunnel Construction, 2021, 41(2): 308-325. (in Chinese))
[2] 田四明, 王伟, 杨昌宇, 等.中国铁路隧道40年发展与展望[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2021, 41(11): 1903-1930.(Tian Siming, Wang Wei, Yang Changyu, et al.40 years of development and prospects of Chinese railway tunnels[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2021, 41(11): 1903-1930. (in Chinese))
[3] 葛双双, 高玮, 汪义伟, 等.我国交通盾构隧道病害、评价及治理研究综述[J]. 土木工程学报, 2023, 56(1): 119-128. (Ge Shuangshuang, Gao Wei, Wang Yiwei, et al. A review of traffic shield tunnel disease, evaluation and management research in China[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering, 2023, 56(1): 119-128. (in Chinese))
[4] 陈湘生, 徐志豪, 包小华, 等.中国隧道建设面临的若干挑战与技术突破[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33(12): 1-14.(Chen Xiangsheng, Xu Zhihao, Bao Xiaohua, et al. Several challenges and technological breakthroughs in Chinese tunnel construction[J]. Chinese Journal of Highways, 2020, 33(12): 1-14. (in Chinese))
[5] 《中国公路学报》编辑部.中国交通隧道工程学术研究综述2022[J].中国公路学报, 2022, 35(4): 1-40. (Editorial Board of the Chinese Journal of Highways. A review of academic research on traffic tunnel engineering in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Highways, 2022, 35(4): 1-40. (in Chinese))
[6] 张学文.运营期地铁隧道常见结构病害成因及治理方法研究[D]. 南京:南京大学, 2014. (Zhang Xuewen. Research on the causes and management methods of common structural diseases in underpass tunnels during operation[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University, 2014. (in Chinese))
[7] 赵勇.铁路隧道拱部病害凿除模筑对衬砌影响研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2021, 38(6): 53-57, 86. (Zhao Yong. Research on the effect of chiseling and moulding on the lining of railroad tunnel arch lesions[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering, 2021, 38(6): 53-57, 86. (in Chinese))
[8] 张旭, 黄诗闵, 许有俊, 等.衬砌背后空洞对连拱隧道结构受力和破坏的影响研究[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2022, 42(1): 90-102. (Zhang Xu, Huang Shimin, Xu Youjun, et al. Study of the effect of cavity behind the lining on structural forces and damage in continuous arch tunnels[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2022, 42(1): 90-102. (in Chinese))
[9] 安业成.静、动荷载作用下空洞缺陷对高铁隧道安全性的影响研究[D]. 北京:北京交通大学, 2021. (An Yecheng. Study on the effect of cavity defects on the safety of high-speed railway tunnels under static and dynamic loads[D]. Beijing:Peking University, 2021. (in Chinese))
[10] 王海丽. 衬砌背后空洞影响下隧道结构开裂特征及安全性分析[D]. 北京:北京交通大学, 2021. (Wang Haili. Analysis of cracking characteristics and safety of tunnel structure under the influence of cavity behind the lining[D].Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2021. (in Chinese))
[11] 彭跃, 王桂林, 张永兴, 等.衬砌背后空洞对在役隧道结构安全性影响研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2008, 4(6): 1101-1104, 1137. (Peng Yue, Wang Guilin, Zhang Yongxing, et al. Study of the impact of cavities behind the lining on the structural safety of tunnels in service[J]. Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2008, 4(6): 1101-1104, 1137. (in Chinese))
[12] 刘德军, 仲飞, 黄宏伟, 等.运营隧道衬砌病害诊治的现状与发展[J]. 中国公路学报, 2021, 34(11): 178-199. (Liu Dejun, Zhong Fei, Huang Hongwei, et al. Status and development of operational tunnel lining disease diagnosis and treatment[J]. Chinese Journal of Highways, 2021, 34(11): 178-199. (in Chinese))
[13] 杨剑, 龚伦.运营隧道拱顶脱空型衬砌厚度不足整治技术研究[J]. 公路, 2022(2): 321-329. (Yang Jian, Gong Lun. Operation of tunnel vault dehollowing type lining thickness deficiency remediation technology research[J]. Highway, 2022(2): 321-329. (in Chinese))
[14] 李福海, 李瑞, 姜怡林, 等.隧道二次衬砌脱空带模注浆对衬砌结构受力影响的试验研究[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2021, 58(5): 147-158. (Li Fuhai, Li Rui, Jiang Yilin, et al. Experimental study on the effect of tunnel secondary lining dehollowing with mold grouting on the force of lining structure[J]. Modern tunneling technology, 2021, 58(5): 147-158. (in Chinese))
[15] 范国宇.隧道预制装配式套拱结构力学性能研究[D]. 重庆:重庆交通大学, 2021. (Fan Guoyu. Research on mechanical properties of tunnel prefabricated assembled set arch structure[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Jiaotong University, 2021. (in Chinese))
[16] 宋远, 李兆平, 黄明利, 等.隧道波纹钢板套衬接头抗弯性能有限元分析[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2020, 40(增1): 216-224. (Song Yuan, Li Zhaoping, Huang Mingli, et al. Finite element analysis of flexural performance of tunnel corrugated steel sleeve liner joints[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2020, 40(Supp.1): 216-224. (in Chinese))
[17] 伍毅敏, 邵帅, 傅鹤林, 等.隧道衬砌拱顶脱空分析及主动监测预防方法[J].中国安全科学学报,2019,29(增1):186-191. (Wu Yimin, Shao Shuai, Fu Helin, et al. Analysis of tunnel lining vault dehollowing and active monitoring prevention method[J]. Chinese Journal of Safety Science,2019,29(Supp.1):186-191. (in Chinese))
[18] 叶艺超, 彭立敏, 雷明锋, 等.不同脱空模式下隧道结构安全状态分析[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2018, 15(11): 2875-2883. (Ye Yichao, Peng Limin, Lei Mingfeng, et al. Analysis of the safety state of the tunnel structure under different decommissioning modes[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2018, 15(11): 2875-2883. (in Chinese))
[19] 张旭, 张成平, 冯岗, 等.衬砌背后空洞影响下隧道结构裂损规律试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2017, 39(6): 1137-1144. (Zhang Xu, Zhang Chengping, Feng Gang, et al. Experimental study on the cracking pattern of tunnel structure under the influence of cavity behind the lining[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2017, 39(6): 1137-1144. (in Chinese))
[20] 张成平, 冯岗, 张旭, 等.衬砌背后双空洞影响下隧道结构的安全状态分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37 (3): 487-493. (Zhang Chengping, Feng Gang, Zhang Xu, et al. Analysis of the safety state of the tunnel structure under the influence of a double cavity behind the lining[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37 (3): 487-493. (in Chinese))
[21] 卢松, 裴向峰, 杨玲洁, 等.基于隧道衬砌脱空模型的叩击信号特征分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2021, 17(5): 1606-1612. (Lu Song, Pei Xiangfeng, Yang Lingjie, et al. Characterization of percussion signal based on tunnel lining dehollowing model [J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2021, 17(5): 1606-1612. (in Chinese))
[22] 傅鹤林, 陈琛, 张加兵, 等.衬砌脱空对现役隧道结构安全性影响研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2016, 13(3): 517-522. (Fu Helin, Chen Chen, Zhang Jiabing, et al. Study on the impact of liner dehollowing on the structural safety of in-service tunnels[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2016, 13(3): 517-522. (in Chinese))
文章导航

/