胶结土力学特性的状态相关性试验及模型预测

陆勇; 冯海华; 朱文轩; 周亚; 叶冠林

doi:10.20174/j.JUSE.2024.05.12

地下空间与工程学报 >

2024 , Vol. 20 >Issue 5: 1541 - 1554

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20174/j.JUSE.2024.05.12

理论与试验研究

胶结土力学特性的状态相关性试验及模型预测

陆勇 ,
冯海华 ,
朱文轩 ,
周亚 ,
叶冠林

展开

1.苏州科技大学土木工程学院,江苏苏州 215011;
2.上海交通大学船舶海洋与建筑工程学院,上海 200240;
3.中亿丰建设集团股份有限公司,江苏苏州 215131

陆勇(1987—),男,安徽天长人,博士,讲师、硕士生导师,主要从事复杂岩土体力学特性及工程数值计算方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: cumtluyong@163.com

收稿日期: 2024-03-10

网络出版日期: 2024-10-31

基金资助

国家自然科学基金(52331010, 42207220);江苏省高等学校基础科学(自然科学)研究项目(22KJB170020)

收起

Experiment and Model Prediction of State-Dependent Mechanical Characteristics of Cemented Soil

Lu Yong ,
Feng Haihua ,
Zhu Wenxuan ,
Zhou Ya ,
Ye Guanlin

Expand

1. School of Civil Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215011, P.R. China;
2. School of Naval Architecture, Ocean & Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, P.R. China;
3. ZYF Construction Group Co., Ltd, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215131, P.R. China

Received date: 2024-03-10

Online published: 2024-10-31

Fold

摘要

在土中掺入一定量的胶结物形成具有显著结构性的人工胶结土,被广泛应用于天然岩土体的改良。然而,结构性的存在往往会诱发胶结土相较重塑土呈现出更为复杂的力学特性,实现其力学行为的定量化分析及合理预测十分必要。此处针对胶结土力学行为的共性问题,开展了不同初始状态水泥胶结土的三轴压缩与剪切试验,系统分析了其力学特性的状态相关性,并采用状态相关模型开展其力学行为的计算预测。结果表明:(1)胶结土的峰值剪切应力比受初始状态量(孔隙比、围压、胶结性)的影响显著,而残余剪切应力比受初始状态量的影响较小,表明残余强度可作为一个状态无关的力学特性参数;(2)胶结土的等向压缩曲线受初始状态量(孔隙比、胶结性)的影响显著,但结构性损伤使得压缩曲线会逐渐向重塑胶结土压缩曲线趋近,表明重塑胶结土压缩曲线可作为固有压缩曲线;(3)通过计算能够较好地再现上述不同初始状态胶结土的等向压缩与三轴剪切试验结果,表明所采用的状态相关本构模型能够合理地描述胶结土的复杂力学行为。

关键词： 胶结土; 力学特性; 状态相关性; 本构模型

本文引用格式

陆勇 , 冯海华 , 朱文轩 , 周亚 , 叶冠林 . 胶结土力学特性的状态相关性试验及模型预测[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2024 , 20(5) : 1541 -1554 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2024.05.12

Abstract

Mixing soil with a certain amount of binding agent can form artificial cemented soil with remarkable structure, which is widely used in the improvement of natural geomaterials. However, the existence of structure often induces cemented soils to appear more complex mechanical characteristics than remolded soil, and it is necessary to achieve quantitative analysis and reasonable prediction of their mechanical behaviors. This paper focuses on the common mechanical characteristics of cemented soil, the triaxial compression and shear tests of cement-bonded soil with different initial states are carried out, and then the state dependence of its mechanical characteristics is systematically analyzed. Finally, the state-dependent model is used to calculate/predict its mechanical behavior. The research results show that: (1) The peak shear stress ratio of cemented soil is significantly affected by its initial state (void ratio, confining pressure, cementation), while the residual shear stress ratio is less affected by the initial state, indicating that the residual strength can be used as a state-independent mechanical parameter; (2) The isotropic consolidation curves of cemented soil is significantly affected by the initial state (void ratio, cementation), but the damage of structure makes these compression curves gradually converge to that of remolded cemented soil, indicating that the consolidation curve of the remolded cemented soil can be used as the inherent compression curve; (3) The isotropic compression and triaxial shear test results of the above-mentioned cemented soils with different initial states show an encouraging agreement with date by calculation, indicating that the state-dependent constitutive model here can reasonably describe the complex mechanical behavior of cemented soil.

Key words： cemented soil; mechanical characteristic; state-dependency; constitutive model

参考文献

[1] 沈珠江. 土体结构性的数学模型─21世纪土力学的核心问题[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1996, 18(1): 95-97. (Shen Zhujiang. Mathematical model for soil structure－The core topic of soil mechanics in the 21st century[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1996, 18(1): 95-97. (in Chinese))
[2] 杨俊, 刘子豪, 张国栋, 等. 复合方法改良膨胀土无侧限抗压强度试验研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2016, 12(4): 1069-1076. (Yang Jun, Liu Zihao, Zhang Guodong, et al. Experimental research on unconfined compressive strength of expansive soil improved by composite method[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2016, 12(4): 1069-1076. (in Chinese))
[3] 钱春香, 王安辉, 王欣. 微生物灌浆加固土体研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(6): 1537-1548. (Qian Chunxiang, Wang Anhui, Wang Xin. Advances of soil improvement with bio-grouting[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(6): 1537-1548. (in Chinese))
[4] 朱文旺, 张文慧, 姜冲, 等. 石灰和水玻璃共同改良粉土试验研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2017, 34(10): 91-94. (Zhu Wenwang, Zhang Wenhui, Jiang Chong, et al. Experimental study on silt improved by lime and sodium silicate[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2017, 34(10): 91-94. (in Chinese))
[5] 刘恩龙, 沈珠江. 不同应力路径下结构性土的力学特性[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2006, 25(10): 2058-2064. (Liu Enlong, Shen Zhujiang. Mechanical behavior of structured soils under different stress paths[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006, 25(10): 2058-2064. (in Chinese))
[6] 蒋明镜, 沈珠江. 结构性粘土试样人工制备方法研究[J]. 水利学报, 1997, 18(1): 57-62. (Jiang Mingjing, Shen Zhujiang. A method of artificial preparation of structured clay samples[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 1997, 18(1): 57-62. (in Chinese))
[7] 刘恩龙, 沈珠江. 人工制备结构性土力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2007, 28(4): 679-683. (Liu Enlong, Shen Zhujiang. Experimental study on mechanical properties of artificially structured soils[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007, 28(4): 679-683. (in Chinese))
[8] 王常明, 匡少华, 王钢城, 等. 结构性土固结不排水剪特性的一种描述方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2010, 31(7): 2035-2039. (Wang Changming, Kuang Shaohua, Wang Gangcheng, et al. A method for describing consolidated-undrained shear behavior of structured soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2010, 31(7): 2035-2039. (in Chinese))
[9] 张耀, 胡再强, 陈昊, 等. 酸性溶液对黄土结构改良的试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(4): 681-688. (Zhang Yao, Hu Zaiqiang, Chen Hao, et al. Experimental study on evolution of loess structure using acid solutions[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(4): 681-688. (in Chinese))
[10] 刘汉龙, 肖鹏, 肖杨, 等. MICP胶结钙质砂动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(1): 38-45. (Liu Hanlong, Xiao Peng, Xiao Yang, et al. Dynamic behaviors of MICP-treated calcareous sand in cyclic tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2018, 40(1): 38-45. (in Chinese))
[11] 罗开泰, 聂青, 张树祎, 等. 人工制备初始应力各向异性结构性土方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(10): 2815-2820, 2834. (Luo Kaitai, Nie Qing, Zhang Shuyi, et al. Investigation on artificially structured soils with initial stress-induced anisotropy[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(10): 2815-2820, 2834. (in Chinese))
[12] 王绪民, 陈善雄, 程昌炳. 酸性溶液浸泡下原状黄土物理力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(9): 1619-1626. (Wang Xumin, Chen Shanxiong, Cheng Changbing. Experimental study on physic-mechanical characteristics of undisturbed loess soaked in acid solution[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(9): 1619-1626. (in Chinese))
[13] 肖时辉, 廖一蕾, 张子新, 等. 水泥加固砂性土微观特征试验研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2018, 14(1): 43-50. (Xiao Shihui, Liao Yilei, Zhang Zixin, et al. Experimental study on microscopic characteristics of cemented sandy[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2018, 14(1): 43-50. (in Chinese))
[14] 乾增珍, 盛明强, 田开平. 戈壁碎石土胶结作用机制及其微观力学模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(增2): 138-144. (Qian Zengzhen, Sheng Mingqiang, Tian Kaiping. Cementation mechanism and micromechanical model of Gobi gravel soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(Supp.2): 138-144. (in Chinese))
[15] 雷华阳, 卢海滨, 王学超, 等. 振动荷载作用下软土加速蠕变的微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(2): 309-316, 324. (Lei Huayang, Lu Haibin, Wang Xuechao, et al. Research on microscopic mechanism of accelerated creep of soft clay under vibration loads[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(2): 309-316, 324. (in Chinese))
[16] 沈珠江, 胡再强. 黄土的二元介质模型[J]. 水利学报, 2003, 24(7): 1-6. (Shen Zhujiang, Hu Zaiqiang. Binary medium model for loess[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2003, 24(7): 1-6. (in Chinese))
[17] 刘恩龙, 罗开泰, 张树祎. 初始应力各向异性结构性土的二元介质模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 34(11): 3103-3109. (Liu Enlong, Luo Kaitai, Zhang Shuyi. Binary medium model for structured soils with initial stress-induced anisotropy[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 34(11): 3103-3109. (in Chinese))
[18] Liu E L, Yu H S, Zhou C, et al. A binary-medium constitutive model for artificially structured soils based on the disturbed state concept and homogenization theory[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 17(7): 04016154.
[19] 蒋明镜, 周卫, 刘静德, 等. 基于微观力学机制的各向异性结构性砂土的本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(12): 3347-3355. (Jiang Mingjing, Zhou Wei, Liu Jingde, et al. A constitutive model for anisotropic structured sandy soil based on micromechanical mechanism[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(12): 3347-3355. (in Chinese))
[20] 刘汉龙, 肖杨, 崔允亮. 结构性软土三维弹塑性损伤本构模型研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(4): 637-642. (Liu Hanlong, Xiao Yang, Cui Yunliang. Elasto-plastic damage constitutive model in three-dimensional stress space for structured soft soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(4): 637-642. (in Chinese))
[21] 柳军修, 尹振宇, 杨杰, 等. 结构性粘土边界面模型在FLAC3D中的开发及隧道施工数值模拟[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2020, 39(6): 202-211. (Liu Junxiu, Yin Zhenyu, Yang Jie, et al. Implementation of a bounding surface model of structured clays in FLAC3D and numerical simulation of tunnel construction[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2020, 39(6): 202-211. (in Chinese))
[22] 祝恩阳, 姚仰平. 结构性土UH模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(11): 3101-3110. (Zhu Enyang, Yao Yangping. A UH constitutive model for structured soils[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(11): 3101-3110. (in Chinese))
[23] Yu H S, Tan S M, Schnaid F. A critical state framework for modelling bonded geomaterials[J]. Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 2007, 2(1): 61-74.
[24] Nguyen L, Fatahi B, Khabbaz H. Development of a constitutive model to predict the behavior of cement-treated clay during cementation degradation: C3 model[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 17(7): 04017010.
[25] Rahimi M, Chan D, Nouri A. Bounding surface constitutive model for cemented sand under monotonic loading[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2016, 16(2): 04015049.
[26] 赵春雷, 蔡国庆, 赵成刚, 等. 饱和砂土的循环边界面本构模型[J]. 固体力学学报, 2017, 38(3): 244-252. (Zhao Chunlei, Cai Guoqing, Zhao Chenggang, et al. Cyclic constitutive model of saturated sand based on the bounding surface theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Solid Mechanics, 2017, 38(3): 244-252. (in Chinese))
[27] 邓永锋, 吴子龙, 刘松玉, 等. 地聚合物对水泥固化土强度的影响及其机理分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(3): 446-453. (Deng Yongfeng, Wu Zilong, Liu Songyu, et al. Influence of geopolymer on strength of cement-stabilized soils and its mechanism[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(3): 446-453. (in Chinese))
[28] 桂跃, 吴承坤, 刘颖伸, 等. 利用微生物技术改良泥炭土工程性质试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(2): 269-278. (Gui Yue, Wu Chengkun, Liu Yingshen, et al. Improving engineering properties of peaty soil by biogeotechnology[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 42(2): 269-278. (in Chinese))
[29] 刘松玉, 曹菁菁, 蔡光华. 活性氧化镁碳化固化粉质粘土微观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(5): 1543-1552, 1563. (Liu Songyu, Cao Jingjing, Cai Guanghua. Microstructural mechanism of reactive magnesia carbonated and stabilized silty clays[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(5): 1543-1552, 1563. (in Chinese))
[30] Roscoe K H, Thurairajah A, Schofield A N. Yielding of clays in states wetter than critical[J]. Geotechnique, 1963, 13(3): 211-240.
[31] 钱建固, 黄茂松. 土体应变局部化现象的理论解析[J]. 岩土力学, 2005, 26(3): 432-436. (Qian Jiangu, Huang Maosong. An analytical solution for criterion of onset of strain localization of soils[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2005, 26(3): 432-436. (in Chinese))
[32] 黄茂松, 李学丰, 钱建固. 各向异性砂土的应变局部化分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(10): 1885-1892. (Huang Maosong, Li Xuefeng, Qian Jiangu. Strain localization of anisotropic sands[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(10): 1885-1892. (in Chinese))
[33] 黄茂松, 钱建固, 吴世明. 饱和土体应变局部化的复合体理论[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2002, 24(1): 21-25. (Huang Maosong, Qian Jiangu, Wu Shiming. A homogenization approach to localized deformation in saturated soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2002, 24(1): 21-25. (in Chinese))
[34] Lu Y, Zhu W X, Xiong Y L, et al. Unified description of thermos-elastoplastic behavior of geomaterials considering interparticle bonding[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2022, 22(6): 04022073.
[35] Asaoka A, Nakano M, Noda T. Superloading yield surface concept for highly structured soil behavior[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2000, 40(2): 99-110.
[36] Hashiguchi K. Subloading surface model in unconventional plasticity[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1989, 25(8): 917-945.
[37] 蒋明镜, 肖俞, 孙渝刚, 等. 水泥胶结颗粒的微观力学模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2012, 33(5): 1293-1299. (Jiang Mingjing, Xiao Yu, Sun Yugang, et al. Experimental investigation on a micromechanical model of cement-bonded particles[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(5): 1293-1299. (in Chinese))
[38] 祝恩阳, 李晓强. 胶结结构性土统一硬化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(1): 112-122. (Zhu Enyang, Li Xiaoqiang. A unified hardening model considering bonding in structured soils[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(1): 112-122. (in Chinese))
[39] Nishimura T. Experimental research and modeling of thermo-creep behavior of sedimentary soft rock and its application to BVP[D]. Nagoya: Nagoya Institute of Technology, 2013.
[40] Sekine Y, Zhang F, Tasaka Y, et. al. Model tests and numerical analysis on the evaluation of long-term stability of existing tunnel[A]// 17th ICSMGE[C]. The Netherlands: IOS Press, 2009.

Options

文章导航

模态框（Modal）标题

摘要

本文引用格式

Abstract

参考文献