地下空间开发利用

地下空间开发地质适宜性评价指标选取与赋权

  • 阮明 ,
  • 符尤隆 ,
  • 杨永鹏 ,
  • 周进波
展开
  • 1.海南省海洋地质资源与环境重点实验室,海口 570206;
    2.海南省地质调查院,海口 570206
阮明(1983—),男,湖北荆州人,硕士,正高级工程师,主要从事城市地质、水工环地质等领域的调查研究工作。E-mail:ruanming2022@126.com
周进波(1977—),男,湖北宜城人,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事基础地质、城市地质等领域的调查研究工作。E-mail:68115114@qq.com

收稿日期: 2024-01-11

  网络出版日期: 2024-10-31

基金资助

海南省海洋地质资源与环境重点实验室开放基金(HNHYDZZYHJKF002);海南省自然科学基金(421MS0813);中央地勘基金(DD20190304)

Selection and Weighting of the Evaluation Indicators for Geologic Suitability on Underground Space Development

  • Ruan Ming ,
  • Fu Youlong ,
  • Yang Yongpeng ,
  • Zhou Jinbo
Expand
  • 1. Hainan Key Laboratory of Marine Geological Resourcesand Environment,Haikou 570206,P.R.China;
    2. Hainan Geological Survey Institute,Haikou 570206,P.R.China

Received date: 2024-01-11

  Online published: 2024-10-31

摘要

地下空间评价是服务地下空间开发的先导性工作,近二十年以来,国内多个城市开展了不同尺度的地下空间开发地质适宜性评价,由于评价语义不明确以及地质条件和技术人员认识差异等原因,各城市在评价指标选取和赋权方法选择上不尽相同,制约了评价成果的推广和应用。本文基于系统理论提出地下空间开发地质适宜性评价是以地下空间系统边界、组成要素为研究对象,对系统在外部扰动作用下保持相对平衡状态能力进行评判的一项工作,阐明了具体评价要素和内容;在此基础上,重点针对评价指标体系中的层级组织、粒度选择,指标赋权中的方法选择、优化及校验评估等关键问题,构建了一套方法流程体系。海口江东新区的实践表明,以“限制级、安全级、成本级”划分第一准则层,以“复合迭代熵权法”进行权值计算,以统计评估、专业评估和多方法对比进行权值评估的方法,既体现了专业知识的导向性,也体现了数据的客观性与区分性,可为我国滨海平原城市地下空间开发地质适宜性评价提供方法参考。

本文引用格式

阮明 , 符尤隆 , 杨永鹏 , 周进波 . 地下空间开发地质适宜性评价指标选取与赋权[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2024 , 20(5) : 1418 -1431 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2024.05.02

Abstract

Underground space evaluation is a crucial step in developing underground spaces. Over the past two decades, several Chinese cities have conducted underground space suitability evaluations on different scales. However, due to unclear evaluation semantics, disparities in geological conditions, and technical personnel, these cities have used different evaluation indicators and methods for the evaluation process, which has restricted the promotion and application of the evaluation results. This paper proposes a system theory-based approach to evaluate the geological suitability for underground space development. It suggests that the evaluation of the system's ability to maintain a relative balance under external disturbances is critical, and it identifies specific evaluation elements and contents to address this objective. The paper focuses on the key issues of hierarchy organization, grain selection in the evaluation index system, method selection, optimization, and verification of the evaluation index system, which ultimately leads to the construction of a set of evaluation method procedures. The practice of Jiangdong New District in Haikou validates the method of dividing the first criterion layer into "restriction level, security level, cost level" and calculating weight by "composite iterative entropy weight method". This approach, which reflects the guidance of professional knowledge and the objectivity and differentiation of data, can provide guidance for the geological suitability evaluation of underground space development in coastal plain cities in China.

参考文献

[1] 黄静莉.长春市中心区地下空间岩土体可利用性分析与评价[D].长春:吉林大学,2013.(Huang Jingli.analysis and evaluation of the utilizability of rock and soil mass in chang chun city downtown underground space[D].Changchun:Jilin University,2013.(in Chinese))
[2] Sterling R L, Nelson S R. Planning for underground space: A case study for Minneapolis[R]. Minnesota, 1982.
[3] Boivin D J, Underground space use and planning in the Québec City area[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1990, 5(1-2): 69-83.
[4] Ronka K, Ritola J, Rarhala K. Underground space in land use planning[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1998, 13(1): 39-49.
[5] 潘丽珍,李传斌,祝文君.青岛市城市地下空间开发利用规划研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2006,2(增1):1093-1099.(Pan Lizhen, Li Chuanbin, Zhu Wenjun. Underground space exploitation planning of qingdao city[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2006,2(Supp.1): 1093-1099.(in Chinese))
[6] 柳昆,彭建,彭芳乐.地下空间资源开发利用适宜性评价模型[J].地下空间与工程学报,2011, 7(2):219-231.(Liu Kun, Peng Jian, Peng Fangle. Evaluation model for the suitability of underground space resources exploitation and utilization[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2011, 7(2): 219-231.(in Chinese))
[7] 胡学祥,刘干斌,陶海冰.基于ArcGIS宁波市地下空间开发适宜性评价研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2016,12(6):1439-1444.(Hu Xuexiang, Liu Ganbin, Tao Haibing. Research on evaluation suitability for the development of underground space in Ningbo city based on arcgis[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2016,12(6): 1439-1444.(in Chinese))
[8] 刘运来,吴江鹏,彭培宇,等.基于地质环境要素的地下空间利用适宜性评价[J].长江科学院院报,2017(5):58-62, 67.(Liu Yunlai, Wu Jiangpeng, Peng Peiyu, et al.suitability evaluation for the utilization of underground space in consideration of geo-environmental factors [J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2017(5): 58-62, 67.(in Chinese))
[9] 夏友,马传明.郑州市地下空间资源开发利用地质适宜性评价[J].地下空间与工程学报,2014, 10(3):493-497.(Xia You, Ma Chuanming. Geoenvironmental suitability assessment of underground space resources exploitation and utilization in Zhengzhou city[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2014, 10(3): 493-497.(in Chinese))
[10] 蒋杰,葛伟亚,马青山,等.南昌市中心城区地下空间开发地质适宜性评价[J].地质通报,2021(5):734-744.(Jiang Jie, Ge Weiya, Ma Qingshan, et al. Geological environment suitability assessment of underground space development in Nanchang City[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2021(5): 734-744.(in Chinese))
[11] 李鹏岳,王东辉,李胜伟,等.山前冲积平原型城市地下空间开发利用地质适宜性评价——以成都市为例[J].地质通报,2021,40(10):1644-1655.(Li Pengyue, Wang Donghui, Li Shengwei, et al.Geological suitability evaluation of underground space development and utilization in piedmont alluvial plain cities—An example of Chengdu[J]. Geological Bulletin of China 2021, 40(10) :1644-1655. (in Chinese))
[12] 邢怀学,窦帆帆,葛伟亚,等.城市地下空间开发利用地质适宜性三维评价指标体系研究——以杭州市为例[J].地质论评,2022(2):607-614.(Xing Huaixue, Dou Fanfan, Ge Weiya, et al. The research on 3D evaluation index system of geological suitability for urban undergound space development and utilization[J]. Geological Review, 2022(2): 607-614. (in Chinese))
[13] 吴炳华,张水军,徐鹏雷,等.宁波市地下空间开发地质环境适宜性评价[J].地下空间与工程学报,2017,13(增1):16-21.(Wu Binghua, Zhang Shuijun, Xu Penglei, et al. Geological environment suitability assessment of underground space development in Ningbo city[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2017,13(Supp.1): 16-21. (in Chinese))
[14] 段怡青,解智强,林美娜,等.基于指数标度AHP的地下空间开发适宜性评价[J].地下空间与工程学报,2021,17(增1):8-15.(Duan Yiqing, XieZhiqiang, Lin Meina, et al. Suitability evaluation of underground space development based on index scale-AHP[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2021,17(Supp.1): 8-15.(in Chinese))
[15] 何静,周圆心,郑桂森,等.北京市地下空间资源利用地质适宜性评价研究[J].地下空间与工程学报,2020,16(4):955-966.(He Jing, Zhou Yuanxin, Zheng Guisen, et al. Research on the geological suitability evaluation system of underground space resource utilization in Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2020,16(4): 955-966. (in Chinese))
[16] 廖建三,彭卫平,林本海.影响广州市浅层地下空间开发利用的地质因素分析及分区评价[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006(增2):3357-3362.(Liao Jiansan, Peng Weiping, Lin Benhai. Analysis and partition evaluation of geological factors affecting space development and utilization of shallow underground in Guangzhou city[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006(Supp.2): 3357-3362. (in Chinese))
[17] 张晓波,刘凯,蒋鹏,等.基于约束条件的深圳市南山区地下空间开发地质适宜性评价[J].水文地质工程地质,2023,50(4):213-224.(Zhang Xiaobo, Liu Kai, Jiang Peng, et al. Geological suitability evaluation of underground space development in Nanshan district of Shenzhen based on constraint conditions [J]. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, 2023,50(4):213-224. (in Chinese))
[18] 刘森,董志良.雄安新区城市地下空间资源开发适宜性评价[J].河北地质大学学报,2019(6):57-62.(Liu Sen, Dong Zhiliang. Suitability evaluation of urban underground space resources development in Xiongan new area[J]. Journal of Hebei GEO University, 2019(6): 57-62. (in Chinese))
[19] 彭柏兴,王星华,王会云,等.长沙市地下空间开发利用现状、适宜性评价与工程措施[J].城市勘测,2021(3):190-194, 199.(Peng Baixing, Wang Xinghua, Wang Huiyun, et al. Current situation,measures and suitability evaluation for development and utilization of underground space in Changsha city[J]. Urban Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, 2021(3): 190-194, 199. (in Chinese))
[20] 刘婷,王寒梅,史玉金,等.特大型城市地下空间资源承载能力评价方法探索——以上海市为例[J].地质通报,2021(10):1609-1616.(Liu Ting, Wang Hanmei, Shi Yujin, et al. Exploration on evaluation method of underground space resources carrying capacity of megacity-A case study of Shanghai[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2021(10): 1609-1616. (in Chinese))
[21] 刘家男,刘艳芳,王祥,等.武汉市地下空间开发利用潜力评价[J].测绘科学,2021(10):202-211.(Liu Jianan, Liu Yanfang, Wang Xiang, et al. Evaluation of development and utilization potential of undergroundspace in Wuhan city[J]. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2021(10): 202-211.(in Chinese))
[22] 俞立平,郑昆.期刊评价中不同客观赋权法权重比较及其思考[J].现代情报,2021(12):121-130.(Yu Liping, Zheng Kun. Comparison and consideration of different objective weighting methods in journal evaluation[J]. Journal of Modern Information, 2021(12): 121-130. (in Chinese))
文章导航

/