为研究黄泛区粉土地层内开挖双线地铁隧道对地上及其周边地面沉降的影响,以某双线地铁隧道开挖工程为例,考虑地下水、隧道间距对地面沉降的影响,采用流固耦合数值方法和理论分析方法对隧道施工引起的地面沉降规律进行分析。将数值模拟数据与Peck公式进行反演计算,并考虑隧道间隔和埋深的影响提出修正Peck公式,再结合叠加原理建立适用于双线隧道开挖引起地面沉降的修正叠加公式。结果表明:隧道开挖扰动地层将引起超静孔隙水压力现象;数值模拟与理论计算得到隧道间隔为4 m时,地面沉降曲线呈现“V”型,隧道间隔为8 m、12 m时,则沉降曲线呈现“U”形;粉土内开挖双线地铁隧道,地面容易受到扰动且沉降量大,随着隧道间距的增加,隧道上方土体沉降量逐渐减小;基于修正Peck公式计算结果与数值模拟结果基本一致,相对误差在3%左右,表明该公式具有很好的实用性。研究可为粉土地区隧道及地下工程建设提供理论依据和技术支撑。
In order to study the influence of a twin-line underground tunnel excavation in the Yellow River flood area silt on the land subsidence above and around it, a twin-line underground tunnel excavation project is taken as an example, considering the influence of groundwater and tunnel spacing on the land subsidence, the fluid-structure coupling analysis and theoretical analysis methods in numerical simulation are used to analyze the land subsidence law caused by tunnel construction. The numerical simulation data and Peck formula were inverted, and the Peck formula was proposed considering the influence of tunnel spacing and buried depth. Combined with the superposition principle, the corrected superposition formula suitable for land subsidence caused by double-line tunnel excavation was established. The results show that tunneling disturbs the stratum and causes the phenomenon of excess pore water pressure. According to numerical simulation and theoretical calculation, when the tunnel interval is 4 m, the land subsidence curve presents a "V" shape, while when the tunnel interval is 8 m or 12 m, the land subsidence curve presents a "U" shape. When the twin-line tunnel is excavated in silt, the land is prone to disturbance and subsidence is large. With the increase of tunnel spacing, the subsidence of soil above the tunnel decreases gradually. The calculation results based on the modified Peck formula are in good agreement with the numerical simulation results, and the relative error is about 3%, indicating that the formula has good practicability. This study can provide theoretical basis and technical support for tunnel and underground engineering construction in silt area.
[1] 卢健, 姚爱军, 郑轩, 等. 地铁双线隧道开挖地表沉降规律及计算方法研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(增2): 3735-3747.
[2] 顾展飞,赵学文,张明飞.纤维加筋红黏土强度特性试验及微观机理分析[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 45(1):83-89.
[3] 宋文杰, 项彦勇, 刘毅, 等. 盾构隧道变位复变函数解的验证与参数分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2021,17(6):1751-1761.
[4] 王敏, 甘晓露, 杜巍, 等. 考虑土体刚度衰减的地面堆载对既有隧道影响[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2021, 17(6):1965-1971,1979.
[5] 兰庆男, 彭鹏, 李长俊, 等. 穿越软硬突变地层隧道纵向不均匀沉降分析[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2022, 18(3):1044-1050.
[6] 张继超, 曾垂刚, 崔乐健, 等. 基于Loganathan & Poulos、Clough修正公式的浅埋超大直径盾构隧道地面沉降预测[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2022, 42(增1): 274-280.
[7] 王剑晨, 刘运亮, 张顶立, 等. 下穿施工影响下既有隧道和地层的位移解析解[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2016, 12(增2): 678-683.
[8] 管浩, 刘维, 王峰, 等. 基于数据增强和机器学习算法的盾构隧道引发地面沉降预测及应用[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2022, 42(增1): 331-341.
[9] 尹光明, 傅鹤林, 侯伟治,等. Peck公式参数的几种取值方法研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2022, 19(7): 2015-2022.
[10] 刘俊杰, 刘俊伟, 任晓敏, 等. 土岩复合地层隧道盾构开挖地表沉降Peck公式修正[J]. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 41(2): 171-177.
[11] Zhou Z, Ding H H, Miao L W, et al. Predictive model for the surface settlement caused by the excavation of twin tunnels[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2021,114: 104014.
[12] Gao Y X, Liu Y W, Tang P J, et al. Modification of peck formula to predict surface settlement of tunnel construction in water-rich sandy cobble strata and its program implementation[J]. Sustainability, 2022,14(21): 14545-14545.
[13] 袁侨蔚, 刘远明, 欧洵, 等. 上软下硬地层隧道盾构施工地表沉降影响因素及规律研究[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2024(2):167-175.
[14] 李涛, 杨玉坤, 常雅儒, 等. 地铁双线盾构下穿对紧邻既有隧道沉降预测方法[J]. 昆明理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2023(3):156-164.
[15] Jin D L, Yuan D J, Li X G, et al. Analysis of the settlement of an existing tunnel induced by shield tunneling underneath[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 81(11): 209-220.
[16] 师刚, 袁浩旭, 张澄玄, 等. 基于Peck公式的双线隧道地面沉降模型及参数研究[J]. 城市轨道交通研究, 2022, 25(1): 161-165.
[17] 杨龙, 徐海清, 李长冬, 等.武汉软土地区盾构施工地面沉降与注浆加固研究[J]. 人民长江, 2021, 52(3): 131-136.
[18] Neurly J A, Chen J, Tang A P, et al. Numerical investigation of ground settlements induced by the construction of Nanjing Weisanlu tunnel and parametric analysis[J]. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2021,46:11223-11239.
[19] 赵秀绍,魏度强,于万友,等.小曲线半径盾构隧道上穿既有隧道影响分析[J].地下空间与工程学报, 2021, 17(4):1216-1224.
[20] 刘石, 姜巍, 宫亚峰, 等. 一次扣拱暗挖法隧道开挖步序优化与地表沉降预测[J]. 现代隧道技术, 2022, 59(增2): 44-53.
[21] 徐旭, 薛彦雨, 张振雨, 等. 双线盾构隧道施工沉降影响规律研究[J]. 工程勘察, 2022, 50(4): 1-7,15.
[22] Zhang C W, Hou W, Sun Z J, et al. Research on ground settlement regularity of soft rock tunnel under ultrasmall distance[J]. Advances in Civil Engineering, 2021, 2021(1):9952638.
[23] Liu C L, Yang S Y, Liu W J, et al. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of soil deformation during shield tunnel construction[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 2022(3):1-11.
[24] Gu Z F, Wei H L, Liu Z K, et al. Dynamic response mechanism of silt ground under vibration load[J]. Sustainability, 2022, 14(16): 10335.
[25] 潘涛. 软土地区双线区间盾构隧道施工对周边地表以及建筑物沉降的影响[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2022, 49(1): 101-108.
[26] Peck R B. Deep excavations and tunneling in soft ground[A] ∥Sociedad Mexicana de Mecánica de Suelos. Proceedings of the 7th International Confer- ence on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering[C]. Mexico City: Sociedad Mexicana de Macánica de Suelos,1969: 225.
[27] Wang J G, Kong S L, Leung C F. Twin tunnels-induced ground settlement in soft soils [A] // Geotechnical Engineering in Urban Construction[C]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2003: 241-244.
[28] 刘波, 陶龙光, 丁城刚, 等. 地铁双隧道施工诱发地表沉降预测研究与应用[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2006, 35 (3): 356-361.
[29] 朱才辉, 李宁. 地铁施工诱发地表最大沉降量估算及规律分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2017, 36(增1): 3543-3560.
[30] 马昭, 张明礼, 段旭晗, 等. 大断面浅埋隧道地表沉降Peck修正公式及其应用[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2024(3):118-125.
