理论与试验研究

地下盐岩溶腔储库单井水平溶解建造流体运移研究

  • 李超 ,
  • 梁卫国 ,
  • 张胜利 ,
  • 肖宁 ,
  • 李静
展开
  • 1.太原理工大学 矿业工程学院,太原 030024;
    2.太原理工大学 原位改性采矿教育部重点实验室,太原 030024
李超(1996—),男,山西长治人,硕士生,主要从事盐岩溶腔建库方面研究工作。E-mail:lc1245048940@163.com
梁卫国(1972—),男,山西盂县人,博士,教授,主要从事原位改性采矿理论与技术方面研究工作。E-mail:liangweiguo@tyut.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2023-09-18

  网络出版日期: 2024-09-04

基金资助

国家自然科学基金杰出青年科学基金(51225404)

Study on Fluid Migration of SWRH Leaching Method of Salt Cavern Underground Storage

  • Li Chao ,
  • Liang Weiguo ,
  • Zhang Shengli ,
  • Xiao Ning ,
  • Li Jing
Expand
  • 1. College of Mining Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, P.R. China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Insitu Property-improving Mining of Ministry of Education, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, P.R. China

Received date: 2023-09-18

  Online published: 2024-09-04

摘要

为提高水平盐穴储库单井后退式溶腔建腔速率,通过相似模型试验与数值计算开展建腔期注水方向对腔内流体运移规律影响研究。数值模拟结果表明:注入淡水接触腔内卤水后浓度会迅速升高,当浓度达到23%左右变为缓慢升高;上下同时入射有利于快速溶腔,垂直向下入射有利于建造更大腔体。相似模型试验流体运移规律与数值模拟基本一致,证明了数值模型的正确性。试验发现:腔内流体主要分为羽流区、边界溶解区、对流扩散区和底部饱和区4个区域;改变注水方向使羽流区流体浓度和流速改变,进而影响边界溶解区高度,与水平入射相比,垂直向上入射、上下型入射、四周型入射和垂直向下入射高度增加了22.2%、26.9%、51.1%、135.6%;改变注水方向使淡水初始向下流速改变,进而改变底部饱和区高度,与水平入射相比,垂上、四周、上下、垂下入射高度降低0%、12.9%、29.9%、70.1%。

本文引用格式

李超 , 梁卫国 , 张胜利 , 肖宁 , 李静 . 地下盐岩溶腔储库单井水平溶解建造流体运移研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2024 , 20(4) : 1257 -1265 . DOI: 10.20174/j.JUSE.2024.04.19

Abstract

In order to improve the cavity construction rate of SWRH(single-well retreating horizontal) leaching method on Salt Cavern Underground Storage, the influence of water injection direction on fluid migration in the cavity was studied during cavern constructional period through similar model test and numerical calculation. Simulation results show: The concentration of the injected fresh water increases rapidly after contacting the brine in the cavity, when the concentration increases to about 23%, it becomes a slow increase; the upward and downward incidence is beneficial to the construction of rapid cavity, and the vertical downward incidence is beneficial to the construction of larger cavity. The fluid migration law of similar model test is basically consistent with that of numerical simulation, which proves the correctness of the numerical model. Tests found: the fluid in the cavity can be divided into four regions : the plume region, the boundary solution region, the convective diffusion region and the bottom saturation region; Replacing the water injection direction changes the fluid concentration and velocity in the plume region, which in turn affects the height of the boundary solution region. Compared with the horizontal incidence, the vertical upward incidence, the upward and downward incidence, the four directions incidence and the vertical downward incidence boundary dissolution zones increase by 22.2%, 26.9%, 51.1%, 135.6%. Replacing the water injection direction changes the initial downward flow rate of fresh water, which in turn changes the height of the bottom saturation region Compared with the horizontal incidence, the vertical upward incidence, the upward and downward incidence, the four directions incidence and the vertical downward incidence heights are reduced by 0%, 12.9%, 29.9%, 70.1%.

参考文献

[1]马新华, 窦立荣, 王红岩, 等. 天然气驱动可持续发展的未来——第28届世界天然气大会综述[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(7): 1-6. (Ma Xinhua, Dou Lirong, Wang Hongyan, et al. A sustainable future—powered by gas: a brief summary from the 28th World Gas Conference (WGC)[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(7): 1-6. (in Chinese))
[2]杨春和, 王同涛. 深地储能研究进展[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2022, 41(9): 1729-1759. (Yang Chunhe, Wang Tongtao. Advance in deep underground energy storage[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2022, 41(9): 1729-1759. (in Chinese))
[3]梁卫国. 一种水平盐岩溶腔储库的建造方法[P]. 中国专利: 201510040182.X, 2015-06-03. (Liang Weiguo. Construction method of horizontal salt karst cavity storage[P]. China Patent: 201510040182.X, 2015-06-03. (in Chinese))
[4]梁卫国, 肖宁, 李宁, 等.盐岩矿床水平储库单井后退式建造技术与多场耦合理论[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2021, 40(11): 2229-2237. ( Liang Weiguo, Xiao Ning, Li Ning, et al. Study on single-well retreating leaching technology and multi-field coupling theory of horizontal storages in salt deposits[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2021, 40(11): 2229-2237. (in Chinese))
[5]Ban F S,Yuan G J, Wan J F, et al. The optimum interwell distance analysis of two-well-horizontal salt cavern construction[J]. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 2021,43(23):3082-310.
[6]王文权, 苗胜东, 邢红艳, 等. 注水排量对水平井造腔腔体形态影响实验研究[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2020, 42(4):476-480. (Wang Wenquan, Miao Shengdong, Xing Hongyan, et al. Experimental study on the influence of water injection displacement on the shape of the cavity built by horizontal well[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 42(4): 476-480. (in Chinese))
[7]Li J L, Yang C H, Shi X L, et al. Construction modeling and shape prediction of horizontal salt caverns for gas/oil storage in bedded salt[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 190:107058.
[8]Li J L, Shi X L, Zhang S. Construction modeling and parameter optimization of multi-step horizontal energy storage salt caverns[J]. Energy, 2020, 203:117840.1-117840.13.
[9]Li J L, Shi X L, Yang C H, et al. Mathematical model of salt cavern leaching for gas storage in high-insoluble salt formations[J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1):372.1-372.12.
[10]Yang J, Li H, Yang C H, et al. Physical simulation of flow field and construction process of horizontal salt cavern for natural gas storage[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2020, 82:103527.
[11]Yang X, Liu X R, Wang J B, et al. Analytical solution of a mathematical model for rock salt dissolution in still water[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2018, 11(23):732.1-732.10.
[12]Yang X, Liu X R. Numerical simulation of rock salt dissolution in dynamic water[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2017, 76(12):427.1-427.10.
[13]邱华富, 姜德义, 陈结. 盐穴储气库建腔期浓度场分布规律研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2018, 14(5): 1400-1409. (Qiu Huafu, Jiang Deyi, Chen Jie. Study on the concentration field distribution in construction period of salt cavity[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2018, 14(5): 1400-1409. (in Chinese))
[14]姜德义, 李晓康, 陈结, 等. 层状盐岩双井流场浓度场试验及数值计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 165-172,182. (Jiang Deyi, Li Xiaokang, Chen Jie, et al. Study on field test and numerical calculation of double-well flow field in layered salt rock[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(1): 165-172,182. (in Chinese))
[15]任松, 唐康, 易亮, 等. 小井间距双井水溶造腔腔体扩展规律研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2018, 14(3): 805-812,858. (Ren Song, Tang Kang, Yi Liang, et al. Research on two-well solution mining cavity expansion with small well space[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2018, 14(3): 805-812,858. (in Chinese))
[16]康延鹏, 焦雨佳, 王建夫, 等. 盐穴储气库水平腔溶蚀特征实验[J]. 油气储运, 2022, 41(9): 1061-1068. (Kang Yanpeng, Jiao Yujia, Wang Jianfu, et al. Experiment on horizontal leaching characteristics of salt cavern gas storage[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2022, 41(9): 1061-1068. (in Chinese))
[17]易亮, 姜德义, 陈结, 等. 小井间距双井水溶造腔模型试验研究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2017, 13(增1): 155-161,169. (Yi Liang, Jiang Deyi, Chen Jie, et al. Research on two-well solution mining model test with small well space[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2017, 13(Supp. 1): 155-161,169. (in Chinese))
[18]刘欢, 王述红, 徐素国, 等. 盐岩储气库造腔期流体运移最大影响范围实验研究[J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 39(2): 266-271. (Liu Huan, Wang Shuhong, Xu Suguo, et al. Experimental research on maximum effect range of fluid migration in cavity construction period of salt rock gas storage[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science), 2018, 39(2): 266-271. (in Chinese))
[19]唐海军, 李晓康, 刘伟, 等. 盐穴储气库水平井造腔扩展规律试验探究[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2019, 15(3): 762-768. (Tang Haijun, Li Xiaokang, Liu Wei, et al. Experimental study on cavity expansion of horizontal well in salt caverns gas storage[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2019, 15(3): 762-768. (in Chinese))
[20]李宁. 传热—对流—传质耦合作用下盐岩水平溶腔的流体运移[D]. 太原:太原理工大学, 2017. (Li Ning. The fluid flow in horizontalsalt cavern under thermal-hydraulic-chemical coupling[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2017. (in Chinese))
[21]北京石油化工工程公司. 氯碱工业理化常数手册[M]. 北京:化学工业出版社, 1988. (Beijing Petrochemical Engineering Company. Handbook of physical and chemical constants of chlor-alkali industry[M]. Beijing:Chemical Industry Publishing House, 1988. (in Chinese))
[22]刘继芹, 刘玉刚, 陈加松, 等. 盐穴储气库天然气阻溶造腔数值模拟[J]. 油气储运, 2017, 36(7): 825-831.(Liu Jiqin, Liu Yugang, Chen Jiasong, et al. A numerical simulation for the solution mining under natural gas of salt-cavern gas storage[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2017, 36(7): 825-831. (in Chinese))
文章导航

/