以福建标准砂(粒径0.5~1.0 mm)为试验对象进行动三轴试验,研究了围压、相对密度、振次对砂土滞回曲线的影响。分别采用滞回曲线长轴斜率K、滞回曲线的面积S、滞回曲线压拉半轴面积差S′、不闭合程度σP以及短长轴比α对福建标准砂滞回曲线形态特征进行定量描述。结果表明:K随着应变增大而减小;当应变较小(＜0.1%)时,随振次的增大K值逐渐增大,但当应变较大(>0.1%)时,K值随振次的增大而减小;围压对K值的影响比较明显,K值随着围压的增大而增大,而相对密度影响则较小;在应变(＜0.1%)发展前期,围压和相对密度等对砂土的滞回曲线S、S′、σP基本无影响,而随应变的增大,S、S′、σP逐渐增大,但它们都随振次的增大在逐渐减小;α随着应变的增加先减小后呈指数增大,其应变转折点随围压的增大在逐渐后移,α随着围压的增大而减小,但随着振次的增大而增大,相对密度对α的影响规律不明。
[1]王家全, 祝梦柯, 唐毅, 等. 单幅值循环动载下饱和砾砂动力特性试验研究[J].地下空间与工程学报, 2021, 17(6): 1821-1828, 1874. (Wang Jiaquan, Zhu Mengke, Tang Yi, et al. Experimental study on dynamic characteristics of saturated gravel under cyclic dynamic load with single amplitude[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2021, 17(6): 1821-1828, 1874. (in Chinese))
[2]魏新江, 庄家煌, 丁智, 等. 地铁循环荷载作用下冻融土滞回曲线及阻尼比特性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019,38(10): 2092-2102.( Wei Xinjiang, Zhuang Jiahuang, Ding Zhi,et al. Research on the characteristics of hysteretic curves and damping ratio of frozen-thawed soil under cyclic subway loading[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019,38(10): 2092-2102. (in Chinese))
[3]Mckavanagh B, Stacey F D. Mechanical hysteresis in rocks at low strain amplitudes and seismic frequencies[J]. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors, 1974, 8(3): 246-250.
[4]邓华锋,胡玉,李建林,等.循环荷载的频率和幅值对砂岩动力特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2017, 8(12): 3402-3409. (Deng Huafeng, Hu Yu, Li Jianlin,et al. Effects of frequency and amplitude of cyclic loading on the dynamic characteristics of sandstone[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(12):3402-3409. (in Chinese))
[5]于升才, 曲树盛, 杨立功, 等. 应变控制下的饱和黏性土动三轴试验研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2019,36(8): 24-28. (Yu Shengcai, Qu Shusheng, Yang Ligong, et al. Research on the saturated cohesive soil with strain controlled dynamic triaxial test[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2019,36(8): 24-28. (in Chinese))
[6]郭林, 蔡袁强, 王军, 等. 长期循环荷载作用下温州结构性软黏土的应变特性研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(12): 2249-2254. (Guo Lin, Cai Yuanqiang, Wang Jun, et al. Long-term cyclic strain behavior of Wenzhou structural soft clay[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(12): 2249-2254. (in Chinese))
[7]刘超, 屈俊童, 段自侠, 等. 洱海泥炭质土滞回曲线形态特征的定量研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2021, 21( 2): 688-693. (Liu Chao, Qu Juntong, Duan Zixia, et al. Quantitative research on morphological characteristics of hysteretic curves of peaty soil in Erhai[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2021, 21(2): 688-693. (in Chinese))
[8]黄娟, 丁祖德, 袁铁映, 等. 循环荷载作用下泥炭质土的动变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(9): 2551-2558. (Huang Juan, Ding Zude, Yuan Tieying, et al. Experimental study of dynamic deformation properties of peaty soil under cyclic loading[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(9): 2551-2558. (in Chinese))
[9]焦贵德, 赵淑萍, 马巍, 等. 循环荷载下冻土的滞回圈演化规律[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2013, 35(7): 1343-1349. (Jiao Guide,Zhao Shuping, Ma Wei, et al. Evolution laws of hysteresis loops of frozen soil under cyclic loading[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(7): 1343-1349. (in Chinese))
[10]庄心善,王俊翔,李凯,等. 风化砂改良膨胀土的滞回曲线特征对比研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2019, 38(增2): 3709-3716. (Zhuang Xinshan, Wang Junxiang, Li Kai, et al. Comparison of hysteretic curve characteristics of expansive soil improved by weathered sand [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 38(Supp.2): 3709-3716. (in Chinese))
[11]庄心善,赵汉文,王俊翔,等.循环荷载下重塑弱膨胀土滞回曲线形态特征定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854.(Zhuang Xinshan, Zhao Hanwen, Wang Junxiang, et al. Quantitative study on morphological characteristics of hysteretic curves of remolded weakly expansive soil under cyclic loading [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854. (in Chinese))
[12]刘新宇,张先伟,孔令伟,等.冲击荷载下花岗岩残积土的滞回曲线特征与损伤定量评价[J]. 振动与冲击, 2021, 40(1): 58-67.(Liu Xinyu, Zhang Xianwei, Kong Lingwei, et al. Characteristics of hysteretic curve and damage quantitative evaluation of granite residual soil under impact load [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2021, 40(1): 58-67. (in Chinese))
[13]Kumar S S, Krishna A M, Dey A. Evaluation of dynamic properties of sandy soil at high cyclic strains[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2017, 99: 157-167.
[14]Liu F R, Zhou Z R, Ma W, et al. Dynamic parameters and hysteresis loop characteristics of frozen silt clay under different cyclic stress paths [J]. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2021 (Supp.2), 1-22.
[15]Zhang D, Li Q M, Liu E L, et al. Dynamic properties of frozensilty soils with different coarse-grained contents subjected to cyclic triaxial loading[J]. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 2019,157: 64-85.
[16]Doygun O, Brandes H G. High strain damping for sands from load-controlled cyclic tests: correlation between stored strain energy and pore water pressure [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 134: 1-20.
[17]宋东松, 冯震, 金红山, 等. 确定砂土动剪切模量和阻尼比的方法对比[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2021, 51(5): 1366-1380.(Song Dongsong, Feng Zhen, Jin Hongshan, et al. Comparison of methods for determining sand dynamic shear modulus and damping ratio[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2021,51(5) :1366-1380. (in Chinese))
[18]American Society for Testing Materials. Standard test methods for the determination of the modulus and damping properties of soils using the cyclic triaxial apparatus(D3999M-2011)[S]. Washington: ASTM International, 2011.
[19]Green R A, Mitchell J K,Polito C P. An energy-based excess pore pressure generation model for cohesionless soils[A]// Proceedings of the John Booker Memorial Symposium Sydney[C]. New South Wales, Australia. Rotterdam, Netherlands: A.A. Balkema Publishers, 2000: 383-390.
