为提升地下商场安全文化建设水平,预防安全事故发生,保障运营安全,从安全文化4个层次全面分析了地下商场安全文化建设因素,首次系统地构建了由安全观念文化等4个一级指标和安全战略意识等28个二级指标构成的地下商场安全文化建设水平评价指标体系;首次将优化层次分析法(OAHP)和信息熵权法的组合权重计算法与物元可拓模型有机融合构建了地下商场安全文化建设水平评价模型;应用该评价体系对西安某大型地下商场进行了实证研究,得出其安全文化建设水平较高,等级为II级,属于自主管理阶段,评价结果与实际情况相符,通过关联分析发现了其安全文化建设的不足,提出了针对性提升措施。研究表明:该评价体系适用于地下商场安全文化建设水平评价。本文成果为地下商场安全文化建设水平评价提供了一种方法。
In order to improve the level of safety culture construction in underground shopping malls, prevent safety accidents and ensure operation safety, the article comprehensively analyzes the factors of safety culture construction in underground shopping malls from four levels of safety culture, it is the first time to construct the evaluation index system of safety culture construction level in underground market, which consists of 4 first-level indexes such as safety concept culture and 28 second-level indexes such as safety strategic consciousness. For the first time, the combination weight calculation model of OAHP, entropy method and matter-element extension theory are combined to construct the evaluation model of safety culture construction level of underground shopping malls. The evaluation model is applied to an empirical study of a large underground shopping mall in Xi 'an, and concludes that the construction of safety culture is at a high level, with a grade of II, which belongs to the stage of self-management, the evaluation results are in accordance with the actual situation, and through the correlation analysis to find out the deficiencies in the construction of safety culture, put forward targeted measures to improve. The study shows that the evaluation system is suitable for the evaluation of the level of safety culture construction in underground shopping malls. It provides a method for evaluating the level of safety culture construction in underground shopping malls.
[1]曾国华,汤志立.城市地下空间一体化发展的内涵、路径及建议[J].地下空间与工程学报,2022,18(3):701-713, 778.(Zeng Guohua,Tang Zhili.Connotation, path and suggestion of integrated development of urban underground space[J].Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2022,18(3):701-713, 778. (in Chinese))
[2]Dov Z. Safety climate and beyond: a multi-level multi-climate framework[J]. Safety Science, 2008,46 : 376-387.
[3]曹志金.水电企业安全文化建设的探索与实践[J].中国安全科学学报,2021,31(增1):92-95.(Cao Zhijin. Exploration and practice of safety culture building in hydropower enterprises[J]. China Safety Science Journal,2021,31(Supp.1):92-95.(in Chinese))
[4]张扬,刘升台,唐安业,等.地勘单位“Four Full”安全文化建设体系研究[J].安全与环境工程,2018,25(1):124-129.(Zhang Yang, Liu Shengtai, Tang Anye, et al. “Four Full” safety culture construction system of geological exploration units[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering,2018,25(1):124-129.(in Chinese))
[5]田水承,李磊,王莉,等.基于ANP法的企业安全文化模糊综合评价[J].中国安全科学学报,2011,21(7):15-20.(Tian Shuicheng,Li Lei,Wang Li, et al. Fuzzy. Comprehensive evaluation of enterprises safety culture based on ANP[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2011,21(7):15-20. (in Chinese))
[6]马跃,傅贵,臧亚丽.企业安全文化建设水平评价指标体系研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2014,24(4):124-129. (Ma Yue,Fu Gui,Zang Yali. Study on evaluation index system of enterprise safety culture construction level[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2014,24(4):124-129.(in Chinese))
[7]Goncalves Filho A P, Waterson P. Maturity models and safety culture: a critical review[J]. Safety Science,2018,105:192-211.
[8]付净,傅贵,张江石,等.基于24Model的煤矿企业安全文化缺欠表征研究[J].安全与环境学报,2019,19(6):2033-2040. (Fu Jing, Fu Gui, Zhang Jiangshi. Approach to the production safety culture deficiencies in the coal mine enterprises based on the 24Model [J]. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management,2019,19(6):2033-2040.(in Chinese))
[9]焦宇,陈曦,李新,等.基于24Model-5Why的航运企业安全文化薄弱环节研究[J].安全与环境学报,2023, 23(4): 1185-1193. (Jiao Yu, Chen Xi,Li Xin. Research on the weaknesses of safety culture in shipping companies based on 24Model-5Why[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 2023, 23(4): 1185-1193.(in Chinese))
[10]李文龙,李慧民,王孙梦,等. 再生利用项目建筑结构安全性评定研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2020,30(7):85-92. (Li Wenlong,Li Huimin,Wang Sunmeng,et al.Research on safety assessment of building structure for regeneration project[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2020,30(7):85-92.(in Chinese))
[11]谢尊贤,徐宝,骆信慧,等.基于优化AHP与物元可拓模型的高层建筑施工安全风险评价[J].土木工程与管理学报,2021,38(2):98-104, 118.(Xie Zunxian,Xu Bao,Luo Xinhui, et al. Evaluation of construction safety risk of high-rise building based on optimized AHP and object-element extension model[J]. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management,2021,38(2):98-104, 118. (in Chinese))
[12]梁田录.美国杜邦公司安全文化的借鉴[J].建筑安全,2010,25(2):10-11.(The reference of American Du Pont safety culture [J].Liang Tianlu. Safety Production and Supervision,2010, 25(2) : 10-11.(in Chinese))
[13]谢尊贤,徐宝,骆信慧,等.高原隧道施工安全风险控制方法研究与应用[J].地下空间与工程学报,2023,19(2):622-631. (Xie Zunxian,Xu Bao,Luo Xinhui, et al. Research and application of safety risk control method in plateau tunnel construction [J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2023,19(2):622-631. (in Chinese))
[14]谢尊贤,宁爽,陈丹,等.基于熵权物元可拓模型的智慧档案馆安全评估[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2021, 21(1): 86-93. (Xie Zunxian,Ning Shuang, Chen Dan et al. On the safety and security assessment of the smart archives based on extension model of the entropy weight matter element[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2021, 21(1): 86-93. (in Chinese))
